This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
This is happening but there are also a significant number of people in the former Donetsk and Luhansk Republics fighting for Russia, plus there's Crimea. All of these places are recognized by the US to be part of Ukraine and those are the territories that Western weapons are formally being supplied to retake.
They had grave doubts about NATO expansion eastwards for decades and were pulled along by the US from 2008 onwards.
The current flow of weapons is a direct result of Russia's invasion of the non-DPR/LPR portions of Ukraine. During the preceding eight years there was a smaller level of support proportional to how much the US cared about the Ukrainians retaking the rebel territories in and of themselves i.e. not nearly as much. Recognizing Crimea and the entire Donbass as Ukrainian is just a diplomatic formality, as they are unlikely to ever retake those regions.
They didn't seem to have had any problems with the Visegrád countries joining, with the US actually blocking France's proposal for immediate accession of Romania and Slovenia in 1997. In 2008 there was a split on further expansion, with the US and Visegrád countries on one side, Germany and France on the other, and the UK in the middle. Now, you can say that Poland and Romania's opinions shouldn't count as much as France or Germany's, but the latter wanted to let the former into the club. At best then opinion among European NATO members was divided, rather than unanimously opposed to further expansion.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link