site banner
ZorbaTHut  2yr ago (text post)   Edited 2yr ago   38725 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of September 12, 2022

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

40
Top Bottom New Old Controversial
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

My dude, I listed three services that provide what I believe to be good quality AI pornography.

I am not aware of a single high-quality AI image of two people having sex. Hell, I haven’t even seen a convincing example of masturbation. To say nothing of the more obscure fetishes you find on /d/. Do such pictures already exist?

It seems to be a special case of the more general problem with existing models that, as you increase the number of objects in the scene and have the people engage in more complex actions, you increase your chances of getting incoherence and body horror.

obscure fetishes you find on /d

I mean if you've got a super-obscure fetish it's not like you're commissioning Rembrandt to do the already-available art. In my meandering experience most niche stuff trends towards being low quality anyways, and the inherent... super-specialization of fetish probably goes a long way.

If I'm into pale girls wearing red high heels and a police uniform, the current situation probably means I can get police uniform or red high heels but AI art is gonna let me layer in all the levels of fetish.

Honestly it's kind of concerning seeing how much internet communities have already done for sexual dysfunction and getting overly fetish-focused.

In my meandering experience most niche stuff trends towards being low quality anyway

I’ve seen this response multiple times now in discussions of AI art, and it’s pretty baffling. “It doesn’t matter if the AI can’t do X because X type of art doesn’t have to be that good in the first place.” That’s not exactly a reassuring marketing pitch for the product you’re trying to sell.

Obviously determinations of quality should be left to people who appreciate the type of art in question in the first place, which you clearly do not.

Honestly it’s kind of concerning seeing how much internet communities have already done for sexual dysfunction

The discussion is over whether the AI can satisfy the requirements in question, not the moral status of the requirements themselves.

I mean my point is that the 'competition' for obscure fetish art really isn't anything great, so the AI's got a lower barrier to entry into the marketplace.

I am not aware of a single high-quality AI image of two people having sex.

This does exist, but you are right to point out it is exceedingly difficult to make.

Given the volume of responses affirming the failures of generated porn, I'm realising my tastes must've bubbled me from dissent. I mostly consume images with only 1 figure involved && this has evidently biased my thinking.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats