site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of September 12, 2022

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

40
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm pro-AI and anti-trans ideology. Can you elaborate on why you think these should be somehow related in my mind? I don't understand why you're confused.

How can the same group of people be so reactionary on so many issues while also supporting the prospect of AI-induced complete social disruption

Charles III's old speech where he mentions Guénon has been making the rounds for obvious reasons, and it explains this. Traditionalists aren't the simple minded people that the progressives like to paint them as, who would be allergic to any form of change. What they have is an aversion to the modern that stems from a connection to the sacred that they have and that moderns lack.

The short of it is that they recognize that some things have a natural essence that can not be changed or gone against without dire consequence, not that all things are such.

Consider the world of Dune, one where technology has "disrupted" mankind to such extreme degrees that it is hard to parse as mankind at times. Yet who would argue that such a world is further from what traditionalists want than the globalist planner dreams they so often rail against?

Perhaps I'm parsing this incorrectly, and if so, my bad, but that didn't clarify anything for me. It's still unclear to me why the two would or should have any relation whatsoever.

A longing for simpler times, when men were real men, women were real women who followed the feminine principle, when people knew their place in society, when a firm handshake got you a job, when people had jobs like shoemaker or blacksmith, not marketing manager, when you got your tomatoes and eggs from the local farmer, not a multinational supermarket, and he didn't use GMO or antibiotics. When churches were beautiful not brutalist, the music was beautiful and not loud and noisy, musicians played instruments, not laptops like Skrillex, artists knew their craft and didn't just didn't paint digitally, when people hand wrote their letters and had to pay close attention as there was no backspace on a sheet of paper. When we said hi to the cashier and didn't just use a self checkout etc.

This is the coherent aesthetic of longing for the old stable social order, the "natural" ways of doing things. Both gender bending and AI disrupt that type of good old way of things.

Oh, I see. I don't much understand longing for times past; they led to where we are now, which I'm thoroughly displeased with, so I really have no desire whatsoever to rewind and repeat. My beliefs are all oriented around the construction of something new. I dislike trans ideology not because it is disruptive with any old social systems but because it is viscerally unpleasant to the new ones I'd like to see flourish.