Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?
This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.
Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I recently read this article, which seems to have awoken some latent bleeding heart in me. As a result, it’s got me thinking about wealth redistribution, whence the following questions:
I understand that this post betrays a real naïveté in both economic knowledge and worldly experience— so I’ll admit that I’m a decent bit embarrassed about making it, but I figure that a Small-Scale Question Sunday thread is the best place to ask this.
I am generally pro-redistribution, but a couple of posts by Bret Deveraux about premodern agriculture made my thoughts about the purpose of inequality coalesce into a much clearer picture:
Everything here is not circumstantial and explains why the system works:
If some landowner deviates from the current optimum, they lose against their neighbors: either they don't have enough land to extract the surplus from, or they don't have enough hands to extract the surplus with. And even if we imagine a peaceful future where no one will threaten anyone with violence, the more equal community will lose against less equal communities because they will "waste" their surplus on a more comfortable life or a more numerous community instead of science, technology or even art.
If you squint really hard, this looks like it applies to modern societies as well. I once wrote a post about the direct economic effect of "eating the 1%" and the overall boost is just not worth it.
If we are made in Lord's image, why can't we say the same?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link