This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Another problem for him is that about 1,000 emails (where he used aliases) reference Rosemont Seneca. So much for “I don’t discuss business with my son.” Also 200 of them evidently are subject to executive privilege which begs a lot of questions.
Also, some of the emails copy Hunter and set up calls with say Burisma.
None of those are individually smoking guns but when you look at the mosaic and pattern Biden doesn’t really have a good defense.
We have three witnesses alleging he was involved in the scheme. We have a fourth say so in an email.
We have these emails you reference.
We have the twenty shell companies.
We have the meetings at Cafe Milano followed by cash payments.
We have the boast about getting the Ukrainian prosecutor fired while have contemporary state department documents praising the efforts of the prosecutor.
We know from Devon Archer the prosecutor actually had harmed Burisma persons.
We know the money for Hunter’s work was spread to the entire Biden family.
We know banks published numerous suspicious activity reports.
We have Hunter saying his dad takes half of his money and other records where they clearly co mingle funds.
We have the Biden estates yet they never came from money and didn’t make that kind of money as a Senator.
We have the years of shady business from Jim Biden.
We have the DOJ stopping appropriate inquiries/ evidence gathering that might further prove the story.
The source documents in things like the Hunter laptop have been cross checked with unrelated sources and check out.
There doesn’t seem to be a hole in the story. At the absolute best, Joe Biden was aware what his son was doing and participated in it without changing American policy. That is he “sold” his office but didn’t give anything of value. That still cannot stand and be much be removed from office.
More options
Context Copy link