site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of September 18, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

11
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

there are hundreds of people being charged or having been charged. there are bound to be some cases which deviate from the norm in terms of sentencing, duration of trial, etc.

In this case, people were highlighting him over nine months ago, and I think there was one or two predicting this particular prat would get either no charges or a cushy deal back before the move from reddit.

There are some plausible innocent explanations -- this story is about a judge complaining that the DoJ was being too lenient with sentencing requests of other people, albeit none who'd been as high-profile, and Epps genuinely has been extremely cooperative with progressive efforts since -- but random chance isn't really one. And those kinder explanations are hard to isolate from less good ones with the available information.

Sure - but there's reasons why. Someone makes a choice about who gets charged with what. They don't just pick a crime out of a barrel.

Jan 6th was a major incident, and the DoJ has come down on the perpetrators like a pile of bricks. They've been especially harsh on the people who helped orchestrate it, like Tarrio. And that's good! They deserved it! But in the midst of that, you have this guy on camera telling people "Tomorrow, we go into the Capitol" and he gets a slap on the wrist? What?

Please, if you can think of an alternative explanation, share it.