naraburns nihil supernum
2yr ago
(text post)
32427 thread views
Israel-Gaza Megathread #2
This is a refreshed megathread for any posts on the conflict between (so far, and so far as I know) Hamas and the Israeli government, as well as related geopolitics. Culture War thread rules apply.
TL;DR: at the moment, "free Palestine" is to me way more objectionable than any plushy short of Hitler.
In politics, timing is everything. If Greta had posted that picture before the Hamas attacks, I would have thought it much more acceptable. (Discuss: which is more of a lost cause: limiting global warming to 1.5K or creating a Palestinian state.) To post a "free Palestine" picture so soon after the Hamas attack strongly indicates a causal chain between the attacks and the picture. I strongly oppose rewarding terrorists with attention for their cause.
Hamas, the government of Gaza, has just proven what they prefer to do with what little independence they have. This is literally the worst time to demand more freedom of Palestine in decades.
I think if people on the same side of an issue as yourself commit atrocities on such a scale, that is a great time to shut the fuck up about that issue for a while. "Free Palestine" with or without the "river to the sea" bit (the latter explicitly calling for the destruction of Israel, the former just implicitly demanding it because an independent Palestine would very likely try to conquer Israel) is the explicit goal of Hamas. If you ride on the wave of attention brought by terrorists, don't be surprised if people claim your are doing PR for the terrorists.
Of course, political protests strictly against the Israel response are acceptable.
I wasn't asking about the acceptability of Greta Thunberg's political views regarding Gaza, I was just asking if a blue octopus plushie is some secret anti-Semitic symbol or something invented to accuse her of being a Nazi.
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
TL;DR: at the moment, "free Palestine" is to me way more objectionable than any plushy short of Hitler.
In politics, timing is everything. If Greta had posted that picture before the Hamas attacks, I would have thought it much more acceptable. (Discuss: which is more of a lost cause: limiting global warming to 1.5K or creating a Palestinian state.) To post a "free Palestine" picture so soon after the Hamas attack strongly indicates a causal chain between the attacks and the picture. I strongly oppose rewarding terrorists with attention for their cause.
Hamas, the government of Gaza, has just proven what they prefer to do with what little independence they have. This is literally the worst time to demand more freedom of Palestine in decades.
I think if people on the same side of an issue as yourself commit atrocities on such a scale, that is a great time to shut the fuck up about that issue for a while. "Free Palestine" with or without the "river to the sea" bit (the latter explicitly calling for the destruction of Israel, the former just implicitly demanding it because an independent Palestine would very likely try to conquer Israel) is the explicit goal of Hamas. If you ride on the wave of attention brought by terrorists, don't be surprised if people claim your are doing PR for the terrorists.
Of course, political protests strictly against the Israel response are acceptable.
all do not push (much) beyond the status quo.
I wasn't asking about the acceptability of Greta Thunberg's political views regarding Gaza, I was just asking if a blue octopus plushie is some secret anti-Semitic symbol or something invented to accuse her of being a Nazi.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link