site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of November 6, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

5
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

KMac is unusual even for far right academics in that he thinks the enlightenment was a good thing and (in the case of the Scottish Enlightenment obviously) Scotland’s great contribution to the world (this was the subject of some of his early work before he started writing only of Jews). He is to some extent the epitome of the ‘racist liberal’ epithet sometimes levied at the erstwhile alt right by neoreactionaries, although in recent years he’s become somewhat more trad, perhaps under the influence of writers he’s hired for TOO.

Since the enlightenment was a primarily gentile project (Spinoza, whose role is often overstated, aside), this puts him in a bind because the traditional tradcath argument (repurposed by Strauss and then later by Moldbug, along with Deneen and others) essentially says that there’s a pretty linear trajectory from the enlightenment to the present, and that while Jews embraced modernity for obvious reasons, they didn’t invent it as part of a ‘group evolutionary strategy’. So MacDonald really has to stick with this argument that It Was A Good Thing Actually, but the juice corrupted/twisted/manipulated/etc society in a way that results in all the things he doesn’t like about modernity.

In a way, MacDonald’s ideology has led him down this dead-end route to extreme antisemitism, it can’t accommodate any alternative explanations.

I’ve met Jewish reactionaries at NYU in the early 2010s, sure. Maybe not exactly with this guy’s ideas, idk.