This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Three possibilities, not mutually exclusively. I'd imagine at least two apply to most straight white cis male supporters of this candidate:
Genuine belief in social justice ethics and analysis. Social justice offers an energizing moral narrative, which conservatism often struggles to provide. Voting for a good cause causes good feels. Even if, much like donating to charity or helping a neighbor, it goes against your superficial self-interest.
Seeing slogans as tribal signals. They may consider conservatives their outgroup. All the formulaic nods to BIPOC and LGBTQIA2S+ rights may not be seen as policy forecasts as such, but ritual ablutions to esoterically say "I am NOT a member of the conservative tribe. Conservatives are no good people. If elected, I will fight that tribe and help your tribe." They do not expect Democrats to pursue policies that would seriously transfer resources from democrat-voting white guys to minorities to an extent that would harm them, but instead harass conservative cake shops and crack down on right wing radicalization, etc.
Broadcasting luxury beliefs. This idea was popularized by Rob Henderson. Supporting policies that harm low class white people conveys, indirectly, that you are not one of those people. Straight white cis male voters for Daniela may, for example, be educated workers who live in rich neighborhoods and send their kids to private schools; as such, they never have to "pay the price" for people of different immigration status, such as drug violence, multilingual classrooms, uninsured drivers doing hit-and-runs, or depressed wages for low-skills jobs. Alternatively, they may aspire to that class, and so imitate its manners.
This is all well worn territory on the motte, but like @f3zinker I'm think you might be new here? Welcome aboard.
More options
Context Copy link