This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I think context matters a lot. Crimea is 'merely' a territorial conflict. Sure, there are a few people living on it who probably have their own preference about which state they want to belong to, but the primary importance is strategic. The overall Ukraine is a bit closer. I vaguely recall that the Russian position is that Ukraine is not a legitimate state and would expect that Putin's preferred outcome would be either the vassalization or annexation of Ukraine, which would probably entail murdering enough journalists to bring them to Russian per-capita standards and so on. Likewise, if China ever gets Taiwan into their clutches, they will of course go full Hong Kong on their civil society. Of course, it is very unlikely that Israels Jewish population in a "river to the sea" scenario would be allowed to stay in Greater Palestine. A return to the medieval Muslim states of tolerance and multi-culturalism (compared to their contemporaries) seems very unlikely. In the best case, the Jews would escape with their lives, but Oct 7 seems closer to the vision of the main "river to sea" proponents. Context matters. Victory and salvation are both relatively abstract ideas which are not terribly offensive, but anyone who phrases them as "Sieg Heil!" will rightly be considered as a Nazi. In another world, "from the river to the sea" could be an innocent call for a transport corridor between Gaza and Jordan, but in this world, it is a genocidal Hamas slogan.
Regarding the Boers, the woke left (and arguably at least the maga right) loves their 'provocative' slogans which they insist should not be taken literally (while at least the more radical fringes take them 100% literally):
Was lock her up non-literal? Team Trump may think 'oh we aren't able to imprison Hillary Clinton right now' or 'there are other more important things we should be doing' but if there was a button that just locked her up, wouldn't they press it? Benghazi, emails, selling uranium to Russia, disappearances... they think she's a criminal.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link