site banner
Advanced search parameters (with examples): "author:quadnarca", "domain:reddit.com", "over18:true"

Showing 4 of 29 results for

domain:aporiamagazine.com

Which one of you can teach me about home automation? Here's my use case:

  • I have a cabin in the country that I would like to preheat in spring and fall with space heaters
  • This means I need a way to remotely see the temperature and switch the heaters on until the temperature reaches 20C
  • I want zero data leaks

What I have learned so far:

  • I need smart plugs for my space heaters, ideally with built-in temperature sensors
  • Home Assistant is the only real option for the management server
  • Zigbee and Z-Wave are the fancy low-power wireless options for smart devices, but for a literal plug they are unnecessary
  • There are two options for smart plug firmware that use WiFi: Tasmota and ESPHome
  • My router/modem is not powerful enough to run Home Assistant

The DIY option is to buy:

  • a small computer to run Home Assistant and Tailscale on
  • a small UPS to protect the PC (my router/modem already has one, but it's too small to be shared)
  • two smart plugs to control two space heaters, ideally with a temp sensor, flashed to run Tasmota or ESPHome

The "happy wife" option is to buy:

  • two Chinese smart plugs, one with a GSM module
  • a SIM card with an IoT phone plan

Am I even moving in the right direction?

the Sokal or Sokal Squared hoaxes are good things, of which I am one

It's one of those weird things about left vs right and the modern social media landscape, but I continue to think there's an important difference in showing that academic publishing is useless versus demonstrating the low (but not zero) standards of a Tiktok outrage-merchant.

also that the overwhelmingly negative reaction he received was very clearly both tribal, unreasonable and unnecessary

He took The Motte's offense particularly hard for obvious reasons, but the reaction of Blocked and Reported's subreddit was not much better from the "don't make yourself the story" angle and considerably less tribal IMO.

He learned an important lesson a hard way, and is at least as good faith as any other "personality" these days, and more so than many.

I think it's more likely that Zahi Hawass is throwing his weight around until he gets some credit for the find.

A lot of the wild cosmological speculations of Joseph Smith and Brigham Young are really really interesting, really unique, really cool. It just is slightly frustrating when the things that are so distinctive about Mormonism are downplayed.

I think the problem here is that the list of things about distinctive about Mormonism that are interesting, unique, and cool are very tightly connected to the list of things that are distinctive about Mormonism that are obviously false. Joseph Smith taught that the Book of Mormon came from a pre-Colombian civilisation of ethnically Middle Eastern Christians in America which had access to Eurasian crops, livestock, and metallurgical knowledge. No archaeological evidence for such a civilisation exists, and someone who has received a secular education would know that. And Mormonism doesn't have the political power to put docents in the Egyptian gallery at the Met to point out the drawings of enslaved Jews and similar historical fudges.

It is still just about possible for an intelligent person to believe the historical claims made by mainstream Judaism or Christianity without rejecting their secular education wholesale - particularly if you treat 1 Genesis as allegorical, as e.g. the Catholic hierarchy does. The hardest part is the Passover Narrative. (Hyksos=Jews is consistent with the Genesis story from Abraham to Joseph and the migration from Canaan to Egypt, and with the wandering in the desert under Moses and eventual return to Canaan, but the Hyksos were not enslaved and were violently expelled rather than fleeing in the night). Historical Nephites and Lamanites and the Book of Mormon as an inspired translation of ancient Nephite scripture is harder to reconcile with secular scholarship than a historical Exodus, and far harder to reconcile than historical Jesus and the New Testament as inspired accounts of his teachings by his contemporaries.

If the Book of Mormon is what it appears to be to secular scholars (a mediocre King James Bible fanfic by a man steeped in but apostate from 19th century American Protestantism, with a side order of Freemasonry) then Mormonism is nothing.