BurdensomeCount
Thou Shalt Read BC's Writings!
The neighborhood of Hampstead is just at present exercised with a series of events which seem to run on lines parallel to those of what was known to the writers of headlines and "The Kensington Horror," or "The Stabbing Woman," or "The Woman in Black." During the past two or three days several cases have occurred of young children straying from home or neglecting to return from their playing on the Heath. In all these cases the children were too young to give any properly intelligible account of themselves, but the consensus of their excuses is that they had been with a "bloofer lady." It has always been late in the evening when they have been missed, and on two occasions the children have not been found until early in the following morning. It is generally supposed in the neighborhood that, as the first child missed gave as his reason for being away that a "bloofer lady" had asked him to come for a walk, the others had picked up the phrase and used it as occasion served. This is the more natural as the favorite game of the little ones at present is luring each other away by wiles. A correspondent writes us that to see some of the tiny tots pretending to be the"bloofer lady" is supremely funny. Some of our caricaturists might, he says, take a lesson in the irony of grotesque by comparing the reality and the picture. It is only in accordance with general principles of human nature that the "bloofer lady" should be the popular role at these al fresco performances.
User ID: 628
To wit, this is another video by the same channel that recorded the arrest OP is talking about; pick a random start point and watch this for a collage of how these sorts of people behave: https://youtube.com/watch?v=XOWLnLNWKAw
And now realize that I, a well adjusted, highly productive member of society gets taxed close to 50% to subsidize these people so they can continue to behave in the way they do right now. Any reasonable person would develop a dislike.
This is just about the lower classes, but other justifiable reasons also exist for those above these people on the social stratum.
I didn't out and about start harping on about that from nowhere. Someone accused me of hating the west first and I just corrected the record. I like many many aspects of the west, lets be clear here.
Yes, exactly! I feel 100% like you just say. Almost like one of those documentaries where you get to observe the bong chav in its native habitat. It's all fun and games as long as we observe the No. 1 cardinal rule which is to never interfere and let nature take its course.
Yes, that's true. There's much I like about the west. For example the institutions are great in theory but the people around them lead to them rotting and withering from inside.
Singapore for instance basically copied British Insitutitons on Independence and has done really really well over the last 70 years while the UK has just declined. The institutions are the same in both places, the only difference is the people, and that's where the divergence in fortunes comes from.
I was just stating a fact, not trying to wage culture war.
Yeah, were I on the jury here I would acquit, and if the law said that I must convict based on the facts we've found I would let the other jury members know about jury nullification (or jury equity as we call it here) and try and convince them all to stick up a middle finger to the law in this particular instance.
I agree this is waging the culture war.
I watched like 15 mins of this video. I think this video is very instructive in teaching people just why I dislike the lower classes. People should watch this and see if they are not immediately revulsed themselves by what they see across many different scenes and different groups of these "nightlife enjoyers"; it's not something particular to any one individual or small group; it's all pervasive amongst this class of people.
Still think white dude in OP's comment was unjustifiably arrested.
Man even I admit that this looks bad...
Completely unjustifiable; the police officers should be disciplined. It's this sort of action that leads to community tensions being (rightfully, I'd add) inflamed.
Indeed, this is Papal Territory. What more apt thing can I or the US Supreme Court say to the vanquised MAGA losers other than "Begone Thot Prot!".
Agreed and honestly I'd wager for most babies born on travel visas their parents would rather they didn't get US citizenship, US tax reporting and being a US persion is a severe burden due to FATCA in pretty much all the rest of the world (banks may well refuse to serve you for example). If you're a successful businessman in Italy the last thing you want is the IRS coming for its cut even though you've never visited the US since childhood and don't even have a US passport. Sure some anchor babies benefit from the current ruling but for others it's really just extra hassle they didn't sign up for.
We all know England are going to make it to the semis and then flop in the worst possible way imaginable.
Eh, I'd take good old Leo as leader of the free world over Trump.
Not quite, it's possible to be a foreigner but not an alien, e.g. a US citizen who also has German citizenship. It's also possible to be an alien but not a foreigner, e.g. a native American back before they were all given citizenship; and it's definitely possible to be an ambassador/foreign minister without being either a foreigner or an alien and you use this language specifically to ensure that it doesn't apply to US ambassadors or foreign ministers who are also US citizens for instance in their own right separately.
The UK actually does something like this. If you're just a random migrant spending time on almost any "residnence" visa category in the UK after 10 years you'll be eligible for ILR (permanent residence basically). However if you're specifically in the UK as an exercise of being part of a foreign nation's retinue to it's mission in the UK there are additional issues and you can't just apply for ILR or naturalisation until you are no longer not subject to immigration control (basically not until your formal status as a diplomat has ended).
It would make perfect sense for children of ambassadors and foreign ministers while they are serving in their capacity as an ambassador/foreign minister to be carved out of US citizenship as a way to not create direct US ties and jurisdiction (like e.g. family law jurisdiction) over a family member of a serving diplomat of the other country, which the other country almost certainly would not be happy about.
Other parse: this will not include person born in the United state who are foreigners AND aliens AND belong to (the families of ambassdors OR foreign ministers). So to be exempt you'd have to be a foreigner and an alien and be born to an ambassador or minister accredited to the USA.
Fair point. But it'll be a more inclusive "white" which I'll take.
Wrong. I think there's a lot good about western countries and their history and everything. It's the people I mostly have an issue with, not the countries themselves. The USA for example I think has it in it to become the shining city on a hill it aspires to be, the geographic expanse, the natural beauty, the resources, it's the people and more specifically the mindset of these people that irks me.
50 years/60 years are also good enough for me. By then the makeup of the US will be so different to right now it'll be effectively a different country regardless!
Important thing is that 5 justices agreed to the main majority ruling which means this issue is hopefully settled and dead for another 130 years. The right is free to try to change the constitution if they don't like the consequences.
I'm halfway through Alito's dissent and man is that dude a hack. Same level of bad as Sotomayor.
I don't see why Watson v RNC is even controversial at all to the point of being a Supreme Court case. In the UK postal votes must be recevied by the close of polling which is absolutely the correct way to do things otherwise even 2 days after polls have closed and counts and recounts have been done if the race is very close it would be possible for a new batch of votes to suddenly turn up because the mail service has been slow and flip the result. Voters and candidates need certainty quickly after polling is concluded about who has won and where we all go from here as a result, the process shouldn't be held hostage by the possibility of some votes turning up 5 days later.
It's not like this is particularly prejudicial to postal voters either, they normally get their ballots many weeks in advance and it's not hard to fill it out (takes minutes) and get it sent off many many weeks before the election. If you delay until the last few days to send off your vote and it gets delayed and doesn't arrive in time then sorry, that's on you.
Yes, this is the most newsworthy thing of it all.
Akshually...
This whole "good faith" negotiation is very much a civilian (meaning civil law)/American thing, in English contract law there is no obligation that the parties are acting in good faith or anything like that. Good faith is mostly reserved for "relational" contracts in English law meaning things like Employment contracts and Franchise agreements where both parties expect there to be long term relations between them.
Hey, jews still have the Jewish Autonomous Oblast. It's even got a rainbow as its official flag!
Degeneracy... degeneracy everywhere...
I do program, and 4.8 is definitely a better programmer than 4.6, but yes non-programming capabilities in general seem to have degrated. Apropos of the same, GLM-5.2 (open weights!) just released and it's literally 2nd on the arena.ai coding leaderboard, above Opus 4.8 even, but is nowhere to be seen on the creative writing or document benchmarks. Companies are correctly focusing on making the best coding models because it's commerically useful in a way that being able to spit out Harry/Snape fanfics at speed isn't.
- Prev
- Next

If the charge is that I prefer competent productive members of society to unproductive people who take out more than they put in or those who would support values and systems that seek to give such people more power and control over society to such people rather than competent people (compared to current baseline, which is already strongly in favour of unproductive vs productive on the basis of raw numbers alone), then yes, I plead guilty.
I don't care whether you are white, black, yellow, green or purple. I care that you are productive and contribute to society and don't try and prevent other productive people form reaching their potential through setting up artificial barriers; and at least if you are a drain on society (nothing inherently wrong in that, people can become disabled through no fault of their own), then at least you express some gratitude for the hand that feeds you instead of complaining it isn't feeding you enough and passing laws and regulations forcing it to feed you even more.
More options
Context Copy link