Its ok, after pounding Jamal in the butt long enough the jewish rape dog sees the error of his ways and tries to hunt down netanyahu, and the book ends with netanyahu on all fours in a gimp suit smirking "who do you think these dogs trained on." fin.
thank you thank you i'll accept my hugo award in straight male tears and romantasy darkweb tokens.
Wait, I hear techno Euofunk. It... its chuck tingle! He's here to save the UK from the evil censorship bill! Hooray hooray we don't need fake moustaches to go on wattpad anymore!
We may be overreading the magical powers of LLMs here. Frequency of posters matters more than granularity and the LLM will pull a dataset towards a big badfit rather than a small goodfit. I shoved the AAQC from Rov_Scam, RandomRanger, myself, MonkeyWithAMachinegun, 100prooftollbooth and Claude kept insisting it was TracingWoodgrains, Naraburns or FCfromSSC as the authors. I'm sure if I fed all the AAQCs into Claude it'd cluster everyone as either self_made_human (indian), 2rafa (new york finance), Tracingwoodgrains (vaguely angry pseudoliberal) or FcfromSSC (boomer) since theres a corpus of adjacency there. Surprisingly about 10 samples in and I didn't get any dean hits, so something must be happening to make Dean a particularly unscrapable voice.
Point is, the magic autocomplete is fun but it isn't accurate, but really if you think about it does it matter? Do we really have distinct voices on this forum as it were, or are we ourselves mirroring dominant stylostic term somewhere present in drips and drabs to make patchwork argument golems to slug it out? Who the fuck knows.
I'm certain its got nothing to do with fucking and everything to do with dominance. My tiny female dog used to hump my big male dog, and she tried to hump the car hubs too. Its not like they didn't fuck, but the leadup seemed to be entirely irrelevant.
Mounted! Finding Habibis Red Rocket
He thought he could find paradise through matyrdom, but instead paradise found him. Does Jamal need to seek heavenly rewards when true love is just one doggy treat away?
Yes, that did end up being the find out phase after fucking around. Maybe Iran believes it was either hiding its fucking around better by pretending to cooperate with the JCPOA and 'new number who dis' to their proxies when they themselves were finding out, but its certainly decided that riding out the finding out phase is relatively painless compared to what Saddam encountered.
The precedent is Saddams pugnacious ambiguity about WMD, where signaling WMD potential was meant to keep other actors off his back while he, I dunno, tried to beat brain cells into Uday. The utility of having a WMD program in the pocket seems to be too tempting an ace to keep from developing, even if it meaningfully changes the strategy of the table if people have to consider hidden cards.
Its fucking obscure even for intra-asian. Casual racists are definitely not aware of it much less ranked competitive racism leagues that asians compete on for fun. The closest I can think for fish head is about fish head curries/soups which is largely a thai/indian thing and not a slur especially punchy. Its like calling a korean "kimchi". like, yea? Am I missing something in the racism meta here
At least you're honest about it being status seeking. Too many Indian men parse their desire for white partners as "cultural incompatibility" which doesn't pass the smell test. The thing is that Indian women aren't even especially unattractive, so this obsession with white women is pure internal status signalling. If the concern ultimately is that indian women auntify into pears past 30 then oh boy are indian dudes in for a rough surprise of what glp free white women typically converge onto.
Cannons! Cannons! I have never heard tits described as cannons since... fuck, the early 00s? Jugs milkers honkers cans tatas funbags "the girls". Never cannons! Who the fuck says that?!
Also, fish head? Can someone with a higher level in Racism please explain that to me?
Indians simply try that much harder. Also their relative rareness does make them stand out. Many indian dudes I know, including some who admit as such on this board, would rather claw off their fingers than date an indian girl. More fool them, but it does mean they really double down nonstop.
And in fairness, the tall indian dudes who shave and avoid the potbelly uncle frame can really clean up. Theyre not the most common but there are also a billion indians so statistical effects do come into play.
Her lover was Pakistani, not Indian.
Also, loaded as fuck, mean as fuck, obsessed with Holmes. Make a woman feel special and you get like 40% of the way there, the remaining 80% is money. Age and ugliness is like a 30% hit at most. Don't math me, I dropped out of college like Holmes.
Only if she could do absolute vile things to his anus with a spiked strapon called The Ottoman Resurgence. Them Albanians be freaks yo.
Societies without antinatalist policies like italy and the nordics experienced organic fertility declines. Antinatalism didn't reduce african birth rates. The only thing that actually works is womens economic empowerment and a tradeoff between autonomic hedonism versus domestic partnership, and lets be fucking real for most societies domestic partnership kind of left women on the short end of the stick once the gossiping church ladies became insignificant as a social power vector.
China korea japan do have their problems and their dating markets are insane (plus the dudes are just really fucking rizzless) but thats an issue of social outcomes being determined by rival economic activity (property+education) that just makes status a red queen race there. The gender wars are restricted to korea, and many east asian women are not keen on the western feminist literature because it has made western women ugly and miserable at the same time. Better to cry in the back of a BMW than ride your own bicycle. Maybe BYD dirt cheap cars having built in massage chairs and friendly AI changes the calculus though.
"Smart" people are more wont to firmly believe wrong facts precisely because they in their smartness know better and so if they convinced themselves of the truth of a fact it becomes that much more difficult to persuade otherwise than a low brainpowef normie.
Similarly, women so convinced of the total vileness of men are that much more resistant to acknowledging their own foibles contributing to their failures in acretive mate selection, which kind of just lengthens the periods of misandrist seething in between shortening decision windows to determine that Politically Tolerable Good Guy checks the right boxes just to prove a point about how she has gotten One Of The Good Ones.
The baseline probably is "men are capable of being threats women need to be aware of" which is by itself a much better framing than "girlboss your way to making any man your bitch" but too many contradicting messages merge into a soup of mutually incompatible messages for women. He must love you for who you are, also youre perfect as a fatty fatass emulating lizzo, also be fucking real ozempic exists just fucking hse it. You are a queen whose body is a temple no man must violate but also billionaire bestiality rapefics are what you crave.
Thankfully IRL interactions do in fact break this mental pattern pretty hard and pretty fast since most men like most women are harmless normie dipshits who are simply stumbling through life and that ruins the mystique. The challenge is to persist social interactions past the mandatory go home and sleep phase, and there the seduction of the algorithm versus the real person becomes a real demon to manage. Im in favour of leaning into the parasocial ai companion torment nexus outcome and mandate that the ai daemons gently but firmly encourage their humans to become competent socially if only to reduce token burn on a strained chipset.
Theres a series of "takedowns" on the millienal feminism of progressives that internalized the oppression stack meta, with the latest being anything covering Lindy West's autobiography. Its generally unimportant slop featuring handwringing of older women wondering where it all went wrong for feminism, but the most telling is the acknowledgment that the "neuro divergent racial minority" husband of Lindy West may have been exploiting his status as an oppressed minority to excuse his bad behaviors. Getting progressive points for dating shitty self victimizing minorities was always performatively tenuous but women locked into the progressive feedback loop gaslit themselves into accepting shitty behavior from their partners so long as the oppression meta dominated.
The easy solution is to not care about being Problematic, but that needs realization that minorities failing is a function of their own general incompetence, not some vague white privilege people need to be guilted into atoning for.
The cultural distance of your ancestors is not nearly as great as you might be envisioning. Different prayer traditions and meal sacrements are not as large a cleave as the demand for female genital mutiliation or expectation that women must be slaves to the mans household. Exit from oppression is legit, but the oppression must be clearly identified. Refusal to admit that some cultures, coincidentally largely brown ones, are shit cultures is what drives most of this taxonomical arbitrage ailing the west now.
Without a common overculture assimilation will never happen. Multicultural societies exist independently from each other even if geographically side by side. Generations go past and the blacks are still self segregated from the whites in the US south, just as the hutu and tutsi and bla bla bla too many billions of counterexamples. Multicultural assimilation is a Fukuyaman fantasy where the wealth of the west being contingent on liberal values was treated as axiomatic truth that was reinforced by the total failure of communism or theocracy to deliver materialist benefits, a fantasy that started ringing hollow already from its inception and now has collapsed with the advent of scrap-picking amongst the gutted western aspirants and the resilience of nonliberal materialist delivery models in the East.
Perhaps the greater concern about axiomatic multiculturalism is that the underlying fiction, that western liberalism is the dominant 'first among equals' of all the cultures, is actually false. That western liberalism, the prize western conservatives and progressives are fighting to define as the civilizational end state, does not actually stand up to either the weight of worldly value preferences or material delivery. The initial assumption eschatological culturalists made was that western liberalism would make poor foreigners attracted to western values because it made them rich, and that would cement the world order as rich enlightened western value oriented versus whatever grunting apes made up the rest of the world. Turns out that on its own assumption western values are viewed as starting to suck, and without the material delivery then whats the fucking point.
- Prev
- Next

US aids Pakistan because Pakistan surrendered oversight of CIA activities in the Hindu Kush listening posts entirely in exchange for having its own free hand to do its own dastardly shit, and from there the Pakistanis leveraged their place as 'useful assholes' for many players globally, a role India never managed because India saw itself too important to aid foreigners at all and so was bypassed by major powers. The Pakistanis asked for US help and offered something in return, India always said it could chart its own course while begging for aid whenever shit hit the fan (request for US carriers in 1962 war, request for USSR submarine support against the US carrier group in 1971, requests for SU30 technology transfers, requests for IMF bailouts, requests for waiver for purchasing Russian/Iranian oil, etc etc etc)
Kishores own reputation within the international commentariat is a byproduct of market demand for a non-Chinese articulate ostensibly neutral heavyweight that isn't bogged down by domestic political considerations polluting the discussion: Kishores commentary and analysis is hardly more breathtaking than informed western China observers that seem similarly dispassionate about capability convergence inevitability like basically the entire US Chamber of Commerce circa 1998-2013, or Jeffrey Sachs and Joseph Nye if you want to be intellectual about things.
However, Kishores own media ascendancy is also a byproduct of a deliberate internal tension within the Singapore foreign policy establishment where a pro-US advocate is always raised up at the same pace as an anti-US advocate, and the two actually switch positions depending on the needs of the moment. Kishores antithesis is Kausikan Bilahari, who himself enjoys some time on the media circuits when a counter to the China ascendancy is also sought. You can see the same pattern in others, there is also Chan Heng Chee and Tommy Koh, but that gets too deep into the weeds of Singapores arcane adversarial-cooption civil service modality.
Also, and lets be fucking frank here, Kishores pro-China anti-US sentiment comes from what looks like a fairly obvious chip on his shoulder. His first book was 'Can Asians Think', a direct rejoinder to a presumed racial contempt that supposedly existed in the western policy establishment which denigrated asian (specifically southeast Asian (singapore) at time of writing, but later extended to China and the subcontinent) intellectual ability and execution capacity. Thing is, even at that time of writing the US policy establishment and broadly the west as a whole recognized asian capability and its necessity to be actively managed. Kishores voluminious presence on the media circuit is downstream of what looks like obvious status reassertion, and that there is an especially receptive audience because US domestic political considerations make people cast about for an ostensible 'neutral' just happens to direct that gravy train straight to Kishores lap.
More options
Context Copy link