ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
No bio...
User ID: 626
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
4hr ago
Reversed stupidity is still not intelligence.
Sure it is. The stupidity of the tribes doesn't overlal much, so if you can get them to counter each other, everyone ends up better off.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
11hr ago
It was actually "Substack" all along, but I was acting like it's a slur.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
11hr ago
Yup, that or nationalize them outright, or provide a public platform.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
11hr ago
And I say this as someone who thought Jack’s original app, from ~2010 and right up to the way it introduced dissenting voices during COVID-19, provided an indispensable service to humanity.
I'm not seeing how this particular belief would increase your credibility on the issue.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
11hr ago
So those who are against free speech on the basis of conflict theory are openly admitting that they don't believe that they have an advantage in the realm of ideas.
Not so simple. It's pretty trivial to come up with justifications why my ideas are good but not immediately obvious. For example, I believe my ideas tend to be good in the lonf term, but inferior ideas are more appealing in the short term, and that there's a lot of people with high time preference. A progressive, on the other hand, might believe that someone's bigotry might prevent them from trying something, but once they do, it turns out to be not so bad (see for example "but have you considered the Irish" arguments when immigration is brought up).
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
13hr ago
I feel pretty darn maskless here. I can talk about Jewish influence on Western politics, and I can talk about my deep abiding desire to become a woman. Rare is the space that tolerates both.
I think what he means is that the place is perfectly open to Google CrawlBot, and how many AGP antisemites can there be in the world? Between your posts here, and the rest of your Internet fingerprint, you might get got like Light Yagami.
Some of us have come to terms with it, even as we maintain a fig leaf of plausible deniability, but he might not be ready for it.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
13hr ago
Lot's of work at work, so I didn't get a lot done this week. I did manage to chip away a little bit at the refactoring, and I am quite sure this is the right way to go as it will save me some work in the future, but it's still not finished. Until then, no Substack integration, and not much new.
How are you doing @Southkraut? I was planning to respond to your report last week, but never got around to it, so let me say here:
...as it turns out, it's Unreal's fault. Apparently ProjectileMovementComponent doesn't detect collisions if the collider isn't the actor's RootComponent. And I had written a custom RootComponent that I put in charge of situationally instantiating subcomponents, including said collider and the MovementComponent. Sad. So my options now are:
- Always make the collider the root. But that leaves a blank spot for actors that shouldn't have a collider, and they'd have to be treated differently. But I guess I have to do that anyways.
- Let my custom RootComponent inherit from collider. Wait, no, that won't work because there are separate collider classes for each primitive shape. And also doesn't account for acotrs that shouldn't collide.
- Write my own MovementComponent that doesn't require this specific setup.
- Attempt to fix Unreal's MovementComponent and hope they accept my changes, most likely only to learn that it has to be the way it is and I am abjectly ignorant of the many good reasons.
I think every non-game programmer that dabbled in game engines had the brilliant thought of "I'm going to design it in an 'engine agnostic' way, so if I need to switch the engine, it can be done easily"... and then you always run into to this sort of shit. I swear to god, the GameDev people hate us.
As for your link, the reason communities don't "feel like home"
No, you're missing the point a bit. It's fine if this place doesn't feel like "home" to you, but I'm saying that the reason it does for me, is that I don't feel like I have to work for, buy, or sell anything here. Your shopping mall analogy might be quite apt, because if all you're doing is buying the hottest new product, I guess at some point it's going to feel a bit empty.
From my side, I guess I could try upping my game to make this place more appealing to people like you, but the issue is that for me the whole appeal is [insert that Buena Vista Social Club anecdote], and also that I don't have to.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
14hr ago
Well then, you are doing it right.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
14hr ago
I hope I don't get banned.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
14hr ago
Have you considered opening a S***tack?
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
14hr ago
If you're baiting for a "please don't go", consider me baited. I'm yet to come up with the optimal way to converse with you, but I always enjoy your perspective.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
14hr ago
Bro, this place is just a hangout without pretensious ideals like Less Wrong, I doubt there's a lot of people who post here with the goal to blow lurkers' minds, and the ones that do are probably eyeing a S***tack career. Anyway, if you're mainly here for consoooming instead of participating as an equal, you're probably doing it wrong.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
15hr ago
My cash could be bound up in investments.
I don't know how American banks do things, but surely they'd take your assets into account as well? Worst case scenario, I'm sure they'd give you a loan against your investments as collateral? Isn't that how Elon financed his Twitter purchase?
What's the practical difference between "I can prove I have been earning $X/month for years" and "I can prove I paid back $Y/month of credit card loans for years"?
The former establishes your ability to pay given responsible behavior, the latter establishes that you had a pattern of responsible behavior, while providing some useful metrics on the size of loans you were able to manage.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
16hr ago
Because "living above your means" exists on any income level, and if you earn so much, but aren't financially irresponsible, why aren't you buying with cash to begim with?
Why put so much effort into pretending you're not exercising power?
You can say whatever you want. That doesn’t mean what whatever you say must be published by loudspeaker media institutions and promoted by social media algorithms.
Megaphone media has the excuse of limited resources, but SocMeds have no justification for manipulating the kind of content their users will see. Technologically it's perfectly possible to let every user write their own algorithm, but at the very least people should be given the option to switch to a basic "people who liked X also liked Y" algorithm.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
2d ago
My plans to start World War 3 foiled again.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
2d ago
I mean, let's get real, French food is kinda meh, even German cusine is better.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
2d ago
but Instagram and YouTube both recommend me by far more overtly anti-Zionist and anti-Semitic content than TikTok does.
No one cars about the pro-palestine content causing offense, they care about social media being used as a tool for organisation.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
2d ago
Not sure if broken or just censored by reddit mods (press F to pay respects, RIP in peace), but I'd venture a guess it's a reference to Pablo Iglesias and Pablo Iglesias, unless there's another commie called Y/Iglesias I'm not aware of.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
3d ago
My impression about the original MKULTRA experiments, is that people got so spooked by them that the "tee hee, it didn't even work" argument was deployed to calm them down about it being tried again. Modern studies on the subject officially don't exist as far as I'm aware, you need a tonne people to sign off on anything that even smells like experimenting on humans. Whether they're being done in underground bunkers, and never opened to the public, is another story.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
3d ago
I'm not sure why coordination would be required for this, rather than a desire for the current government to stay in power / whoever would foreseeably take over to stay out of it.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
4d ago
It would make sense if men and women were looking for sex for the sake of sex with the same frequency, intensity, etc, and the only thing stopping them from getting it in the past, were those evil traditional sexual mores. This is the case with gay hookups, and you indeed see amounts of sex orders of magnitude beyond what straights can achieve. However, in the case of relations between men and women, the sexual mores performed a regulatory function (rather than a purely restrictive one), attempting to give the most amount of people at least some of what they want. But because men and women have different preferences, and are looking for different things, by abolishing the sexual mores, instead of "lifting restrictions on sex" all we accomplished was locking men and women into a defect-defect spiral, which resulted in less sex for everybody.
ArjinFerman
Tinfoil Gigachad
4d ago
Stupidpol is not a mainstream left-wing forum, it's a forum of left-wing rejects that are routinely called fascist, who were preparing for offsite emigration themselves at one point. I used to post there myself.
Huh? The only mass immigration that can be described as "voted for" was the intra-EU one. Everything else was fait accompli, and parties who did want to oppose and reverse it are being suppressed by various means.
More options
Context Copy link