@ArjinFerman's banner p

ArjinFerman

Tinfoil Gigachad

2 followers   follows 4 users  
joined 2022 September 05 16:31:45 UTC
Verified Email

				

User ID: 626

ArjinFerman

Tinfoil Gigachad

2 followers   follows 4 users   joined 2022 September 05 16:31:45 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 626

Verified Email

Be the change you want to see. Nothing wrong with either of these topics, but they're hardly groundbreaking conversations, we've had them many times before.

They're allowed, his point is that it should be the only option, if you want to do a filibuster.

Yeah, I also saw a lot of trans commentary. It makes sense for the international press to ignore it, of the two issues this is less consequential - "oh no, a UK media outlet was dishonest in it's coverage about the elections in another contry!". Bias about the trans issue is relevant to other countries, because the same kind of shenanigans are going on throughout the west, so bringing up what the BBC did about it would cause normies to start asking the wrong sort of questions.

Strange that a man who can be accused of at most trying and failing to correct the ship, resigns.

I'm pretty sure he could also be accused of not even trying, perhaps even outright abating. Why should we assume he was trying to right the ship based on nothing but which party he's associated with?

If the “bait” is so fine grained that you need a fifty page analysis about it whether or not it’s bait,

Whatever gave you that idea? Literally everything he posts in top level is bait. Watson was a subject of past culture war debate, and the rat-sphere was sympathetic to him, so he attacked him because he wanted to own the chuds. It's as simple as that. If you think that's uncharitable, then the fact that he refuses to adress responses that show he's just plain wrong, proves it.

Meanwhile the discussion gets slower and more sclerotic every week and there are fewer and fewer top level posts.

I'm not here to serve as entertainment. Letting people rile others up for shits and giggles, because you find the conversations "sclerotic" would just shit this place up. You can literlly just go on over to rdrama if you're so bored.

My point was that given the ancient Greeks were complaining that their youth sucked, and I've now seen two generations of older people say their youth sucked (boomers/Gen X > millenials & everyone > Gen Z), it seems very likely that every generation likes to think the ones after them suck.

I can't help but notice that we aren't currently living under the hegemony of Greece.

I did see it, I mean I noticed no precedent of the "come on, it's just a tiny percentage" people having had their own tiny percentage they visibly cared about a lot.

Wait, so you're not even arguing for the argument that "It is quite fair to be livid about similarly miniscule numbers" , you're just hypocrisy-policing? If that's what you're going for, are you telling me you never saw anyone being bothered about school shootings?

First, I don't recall you agreeing with me when it was about the tiny number of transed kids.

Uh... surely you must have seen one of my many top-level comments on the subject. If anything I don't remember you saying all that much about it.

Second, you appear to be one of the three principled autistically-consistent-argument-appliers among seven zillion culture warriors, so unilateral disarmament is not in my interest.

Well, if you're just pursuing your interest, why not say that from the top, instead of acting like you're bothered by a violation of a principle?

What's interesting about posting try-hard "provocative" top level posts, and ignoring literally everyone who points that out several of the premises are wrong?

I didn't have a precedent to refer to before.

How exactly did you run into this forum being absolutely livid about the small number of kids being transed without seeing the "come on, it's just a tiny percentage of people affected"?

Only if it actually becomes a commonplace bipartisan argument.

I literally just agreed with you, what more do you want?

It is quite fair to be livid about similarly miniscule numbers

The thing is I've been told that it's not, and I never saw you step in before. Can I count on you saying something the next time someone uses this argument?

Anyway, sure, give these people some restitution. Unlike transgender care, this is actually reversible.

Unless this idea includes legalizing polygamy, it's probably not going to be an issue.

Of course it would also be hilarious to see this backfire when a flood of Muslim women arrives completely on board with the "get married and have at least two children" plan.

How is that "backfiring"?

Outside of the bailey of "transwomen are women," there is a motte of the leftist position of transwomen in women's prison of trying to protect transwomen from being raped in men's prisons.

That strikes me as rather schizophrenic. If men (/who end up in prison) are so rapey, it doesn't strike me as a great idea to put them in women's prisons.

Personally, I was thinking build a few trans-specific prisons.

Yeah, that's fine. I'd still be a bit miffed about having to bend over backwards for a segment of the population that will probably return their gratitude by calling me a nazi, but whatever, it's an acceptable compromise.

Outside of the bailey (...) there is a motte

The motte is inside the bailey ;)

It does not -- if I want a pickup, I will go buy a regular 1/2 tonne 4x4 from a major manufacturer -- Ford alone sells nearly a million of these per year.

That just means they're not very good trucks and are losing the competition. When the Model Y was the best selling car in a given year (or quarter, I forget), Elon was rightfully crowing about it. Same rules apply when things don't go his way.

Hard to know until you try!

And know that we know, we can call it a dumpster fire.

Anyways, it really depends on how much the bet cost and what the margins are like on the trucks that they are selling -- 'making less money than planned' is not a dumpster fire;

Opportunity costs are a thing.

Also, when you are trying to wow your investors with a shiny new product and how much it will sell, don't even get the order of magnitude right, and then see the sales cut by half the following year, yeah, that's a dumpster fire. The same thing with Optimus, if (or rather when) it turns out it's a dud, it will be pure cope to claim "well, it's not selling that much worse than Boston Dynamics".

I don't know what these figures are, do you?

No, sadly the world doesn't run on open source, and companies tend to be pretty cagey about their failures.

You will note a distinct lack of recalls related to issues of spontaneous combustion on that list

Well... that's technically correct, but it's not clear whether that's because they don't have an issue, or just don't want to make the recall public.

The recovery of my nuked work is going well, it's indeed quite a bit easier to retrace my own steps than it was fumbling around for a solution, but I'll probably need another week to wrap it up.

How have you been doing @Southkraut?

Trans-friendly feminism is suddenly making some sense.

And why not just segregate prisons by sex like we've been doing all this time? Literally what's the upside of doing it your way?

Are we still doing the 90's "women can do anything men do, just as well" thing? They can't even match men in Call Of Duty, I doubt either the skill or apetite for actual warfare.

IDK man -- "not going as well as we'd hoped" with a brand new market segment isn't quite a "dumpster fire" in my book

Well, when you're telling investors how great your company is going to be doing, because of a hot new product you're working on, which then proceeds to flop (as per the expectations you set yourself) I would call it a dimlater fire.

There's also something special-pleadingy about calling it a whole new market segment. It's a pickup truck. It competes with kther pickups.

maybe electric pickups are just not hot sellers?

Yeah... maybe it was a bad idea to bet on an electric piclup, then?

Now this is a (Big 3) dumpster fire!

Oh, the Cybertruck fits that criterion as well:

https://mashable.com/article/every-cybertruck-recall-full-list

I was responding to your point where 'Losing the Space Race Boogaloo to China seems like a fairly big deal.' but I don't see how this could be SpaceX's fault, even if Starship fails, the US is only ahead in space because of SpaceX.

If the Space Race is about the moon, I'm not even sure the US is ahead of China, and I don't see how you don't see it's SoaceX fault. They were supposed to have a whole bunch of milestones checked off by now, and they didn't make it to orbit yet.

and I'm just mentioning their technical achievements, which are secondary to what's actually best about them. The list above is a side effect of the work done lowering the cost of space access.

I agree they're secondary. Most of these aren't what I meant by distance. Distance would be things that are preventing their competitors from taking contracts that would otherwise go to them.

Starship HLS, definitely less than 20 per

How would you know that? The performance of Starship is currently unknown, any slip in how much fuel they'll be able to deliver, or how often they can do it, will result in the total number of necessary launches increasing. That's outside of details like we don't even know if they can do it.

and reduce risks is also the way to do it.

I'm a little skeptical that additional launches being necessary will result in lower risk.

Flipping a red state blue might prove some sort of a point, comparing voting percentages of local politicians to national ones feels quite silly.

Yes, if only they had a twitter feed more appealing to leftwingers, these blue states would surely flip red.

For all your whining about Jews enacting the Great Replacement of the White race, I would wager that orders of magnitude more have fled from Kiev to the safety of London to escape the war than have fled from London to Kiev to escape the Great Replacement.

Does that actually prove one is less likely to result in the end of a nation than the other?

If you listen to Tesla's earning's calls prior to it's launch, it was supposed to be their "best product ever", they haven't mentioned them a single time in quite a while, and the last time I remember he referred to it as "digging our own grave" with it.

EDIT: Musk was saying they're aiming for 200K sales annually, it looks like they're at ~60K total.