BinaryHobo
hauling up the data on the Xerox line
No bio...
User ID: 1535
BinaryHobo
hauling up the data on the Xerox line
2yr ago
The cynical answer still doesn't explain how all those guns got there in the first place.
What do you think the customs inspection capacity was of the average african country during the 20th century?
BinaryHobo
hauling up the data on the Xerox line
2yr ago
Isn't that every bank?
BinaryHobo
hauling up the data on the Xerox line
2yr ago
It's also possible that the nature of the job may result in different baseline levels of suspicion.
If you've put your life in someone's hands (successfully), it might just be harder to see them in a negative light. As opposed to another job where you might have normal office politics, or even be competing.
A brotherhood, instead of co-workers, as it were.
They could also all be corrupt enough to not want IA snooping around. There's several options for a difference in reporting rates viewed from the outside.
BinaryHobo
hauling up the data on the Xerox line
2yr ago
Is it actually productive to try and understand Russian motivations?
Incredibly so. Understanding your opponent is insanely useful in defeating them, generally by allowing you to predict them better. For example, an actor in a war of resources behaves much different than an actor in a war of national honor. The former may be more likely to move troops into sparsely populated and natural resource rich areas, while the latter would be more likely to strike at a capital or some other area of symbolic importance.
Or, to quote Sun Tzu:
If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.
BinaryHobo
hauling up the data on the Xerox line
2yr ago
Fine, but what does that say if the underlying example ultimately proves to be wrong?
I don't think this automatically means anything. A hypothetical extension of real events is basically a hypothetical situation with increased salience.
Did you have something particular in mind?
BinaryHobo
hauling up the data on the Xerox line
2yr ago
I'll give you that one, the right does not seem to be a single cohesive group at the moment.
BinaryHobo
hauling up the data on the Xerox line
2yr ago
I don't think low end ($40-50) android tablets have hardware to connect to the mobile network.
I guess I could be wrong. Volume of cell phones made might make a default chip with that hardware cheaper than one without.
BinaryHobo
hauling up the data on the Xerox line
2yr ago
You're modeling the entire right here as a completely cynical enterprise with no goals beyond hurting their outgroup. I think perhaps you could make some sort of case for an individual, such as Elon himself, but to model the entire right that way is missing the point. And worse, it is inaccurate.
I think you're underestimating the sincerity of the believe that the right has, that ruin and destruction will come from the left gaining unchecked power. Be it the economic conservatives who think a command economy will result in famines and shortages, or the religious factions that tend to believe in literal divine retribution, the beliefs held are sincere.
Now, are there cynical and petty people on the right? Absolutely. There are. But, taking the most cynical interpretation of the right, and comparing it to the left's most noble intentions is not a fair starting point.
BinaryHobo
hauling up the data on the Xerox line
2yr ago
You can sign up for a new gmail account sans phone number on a new android tablet.
Or at least you could a while back (mid 2020).
BinaryHobo
hauling up the data on the Xerox line
2yr ago
A BMI of 26 isn't really that high. A woman with larger breasts and hips can be at that level without even really looking overweight and yet those escorts are making a quarter of what the skinny girls make.
It's also possible those women are making decent money, and the ones that have a BMI > 26 without having large breasts/hips are making ~1/16th (or whatever the numbers need to be to make the math work).
BinaryHobo
hauling up the data on the Xerox line
2yr ago
There's an option you're missing, which is that signaling a higher level of ethics may have, historically, been evolutionarily beneficial actually.
Now, being ethical isn't necessarily required, but thinking about ethics is a prerequisite to signaling ethics.
BinaryHobo
hauling up the data on the Xerox line
2yr ago
Advice is specific direction on how to proceed. That statement does not qualify.
BinaryHobo
hauling up the data on the Xerox line
2yr ago
This is actually an area where the purity spiral moves in your favor.
Splintering off into their own instance means that the normies can't really be exposed to the memes generated on that instance (they'd have to federate with an improperly pure instance to do that, if they were willing to do that, they probably wouldn't be in the purity spiral to begin with).
As opposed to a new faction splintering off on twitter, where they can get exposure to the entire normie audience.
BinaryHobo
hauling up the data on the Xerox line
2yr ago
The phrase "If you were to identify as non-binary, you'd be less likely to get hate-crime charges." is not legal advice. It's a statement about the legal system that is likely true (and might be useful for an accused person to know).
What someone else takes from that is not necessarily the lawyer's business.
BinaryHobo
hauling up the data on the Xerox line
2yr ago
I would agree if I'd received more generic insensitivity responses, but I specifically got "good ally tips"
You committed a faux pas. That is to say, you violated community norms, but not enough to get actually ejected from the community.
The "good ally tips" are the community norms.
BinaryHobo
hauling up the data on the Xerox line
2yr ago
I am imagining reddit-style jannies
Then you lack imagination. There will presumably be some with much stricter mods.
But they'll end up splintering in a series of inevitable purity spirals as these things are wont to do.
Normies would probably end up on whichever one the most celebrities end up on (or their particular favorite if they have one).
BinaryHobo
hauling up the data on the Xerox line
2yr ago
Celebrity endorsements are a strictly less-useful filter for 'the absolute worst' than just googling the industry and picking the most popular product, though.
Sure, but it requires slightly more effort (that is to say, more than literally none).
The filter when you go from no effort -> some effort seems to be roughly proportional to when a website goes from no payment -> some (that is to say you lose about 80% or so).
BinaryHobo
hauling up the data on the Xerox line
2yr ago
Seems like exactly how twitter was before the Elon takeover, except you can't get kicked out of the entire network, you might just have to make an account on a different instance.
Though I doubt you could get a small number of instances. That would require a lot of computing power, and mastodon is hard to monetize.
That last bit is the real reason I don't see mastodon taking over. No ads means you'd have to charge up front, or a subscription, or something. Normies seem willing to endure leftist signaling, but we've never seen them chomping at the bit to pay for it.
I suppose someone could fork the client and change the protocol, but it's not really a mastodon instance at the at point.
BinaryHobo
hauling up the data on the Xerox line
2yr ago
I think you're conflating two different product selection strategies, here.
While maximizing value is a good strategy, it requires investigating every product on the market, which is a huge investment of time (a very precious resource). Another strategy, filtering out the absolute worst with the minimum effort, and going with any of the remaining options does potentially involve paying a premium for a worse product in exchange for time savings, but it's not obvious that his is an irrational move.
In addition to status for visible brands, celebrity endorsements do signal that the product is not the literal worst. To take Gwenyth Paltrow's make-up as an example, I'd be reasonably sure that they contain relatively low levels of skin permeable poisons (at least ones that have an acute effect). Beyond that, if that assumption is violated, they probably have enough money to pay out in a lawsuit.
Those are things I can't be sure about for random things off amazon (or worse, bought in bulk off alibaba, though this would be a probable way to maximize value for my money).
BinaryHobo
hauling up the data on the Xerox line
2yr ago
My point is that most people associate socialism with middle-class Sweden in the '80s,
Uh what? I mean, I don't think the modern DEI initiatives are my first association with socialism either, but neither is Sweden.
My first association is the Soviet Union. After that is China, North Korea, and Cuba.
BinaryHobo
hauling up the data on the Xerox line
2yr ago
More and less in different ways.
There's no way to actually stop someone from speaking (including "dangerous" speech), but they can choose to be on instances that are not federated with instances that tolerate this speech (more power within their fiefdom).
BinaryHobo
hauling up the data on the Xerox line
2yr ago
I think the issue is that I'm still unsure of your position on the singular they for use with a person of unknown gender (old definition).
Specifically the paragraph that starts with:
The problem with it is that in the past...
"it" here seems to imply the new definition, otherwise contrasting with the past is odd (or I'm just parsing something wrong, always an option). I interpreted this as the old definition was fine (if not ideal), and the new version was a problem.
But later there's talk about ambiguity, and as far as I can tell, both definitions do that to roughly the same degree, so I'm not sure why contrasting the old and new definitions comes up beforehand.
BinaryHobo
hauling up the data on the Xerox line
2yr ago
A city can be defended very easily, and unless you're dealing with an extremely casualty insensitive army, no one's gonna just drive in while vehicles are blowing up left and right around them.
I also expected Ukraine to fall rather quickly, but I didn't expect anything like this.
I expected cities with major resistance to have their supply lines cut until the majority of the populace went elsewhere (or starved, but the former seems much more likely). Cities don't tend to have the huge food reserves they used to when sieges were more common.
BinaryHobo
hauling up the data on the Xerox line
2yr ago
The new usage, where it's used to refer to individuals even when their gender is known (see what I did there?) is both awkward and frequently unclear.
Could you expand a little on this? I'm not sure how, once you've accepted the singular they for a person of unknown gender or perhaps an abstract person without gender, applying it to different individuals causes more ambiguity.
Or is it just that this previously rage edge-case is becoming more common which is leading to problems?
In the late 19th century and early 20th century, France (really shouldn't single out France, a lot of placed did this) banned the teaching of local languages/official use and engaged in a campaign of forced assimilation (basically, to make France "french").
Before modernization, basically every region of France (and pretty much everywhere in the old world) had a regional language and culture. I think under modern criteria the wiping out of these languages and cultures would be considered ~10-15 genocides (although you could make a convincing argument from anywhere between 4 and about 50).
That's the story of pretty much everywhere in the old world during that period (the period does vary a bit, for example, England managed to wipe out a lot of regional languages much earlier).
More options
Context Copy link