@Botond173's banner p

Botond173


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 05 06:37:06 UTC

				

User ID: 473

Botond173


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 05 06:37:06 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 473

This in particular was addressed here for example:

The interesting thing about this study is the way that it shows how the second-greatest risk is marrying a woman with only 2 partners; the researcher's theory is that this might be the result of over-emphasized comparisons; the woman has just enough experience to realize that there is something else out there, but not enough to realize that most of it isn't an improvement.

https://alphagameplan.blogspot.com/2016/06/n-matters-lot.html

The images in the post are no longer available as it's from 2016 but it doesn't matter much.

There's food for thought in the comments as well such as:

The odds doubling for the 10+ set likely is due to a woman who has that many partners has some other mental short circuit that causes her to either seek personal validation through sex, daddy issues, follow and unquestioningly accept some nonsensical ideology like slut feminism, is bipolar, or has some other issue not listed here. Where the n=2 may be a relatively normal woman who has a basis of comparison, the n=10+ is a strong indicator of some kind of mental/emotional instability.

///

I wonder if "2 prior partners" is the sexual equivalent of "just 2 beers".

///

Two theories:

1) Those may be fairly conservative religious girls who were brought up being told premarital sex and divorce was bad and held off sex to an extent, but went nuts with the divorce as an adult. But they didn't have enough time to accumulate 4-5 partners like the secular women did.

2) Women with 4-5 partners are less likely to get married AT ALL than those with 2 partners, choosing cohabitation instead. If marriage and cohabitation are considered together, those with 4-5 partners are still higher breakup risks than those with 2.

So are we talking about women or girls here?

A man of any ambition will have projects in his (professional) life already. Multiple projects, and some of those he picks up because he has to, not because it's fun. Of course he wouldn't want his girlfriend to be yet another project. That'd be just a pain in the neck.

For example if we assume women also have non obese in their preferences that filters out close to 30% of those men in one fell swoop, just like it did for women.

Assuming that is incorrect though. Women don't have the same average revealed preferences regarding obesity / excess body fat in general as men do, and this applies to pretty much every other preference as well.

Hence my increasing annoyance with the bog standard advice proffered to young males “become worthy and put in some effort and you will find a good woman” as it becomes increasingly divorced from the actual reality on the ground.

It’s not wrong. It is incomplete. Insufficient. If we increase the number of “worthy” men, that’s just intensifying the competition for the desirable women… while ALSO ensuring that more of those ‘worthy’ men will lose and go unfulfilled, DESPITE applying their efforts towards “worthiness.”

I'm compelled to link one of the old comments of @MaiqTheTrue on how men supposedly used to develop masculine traits. I mean no discrespect to him at all with this, but I can't help but consider it to be almost comical, though well-intentioned. I guess it's easy when discussing this particular subject to fall for the fallacy of imagining a past that never existed.

David Cole vastly overstates his own contribution to Revisionism- he never published a single page in the mountains of volumes of Revisionist research, much less on the camps he "Believes" which are the most ridiculous of all frankly.

Come on. The published word isn't the only word that matters. He made a direct-to-video documentary and local report on the Auschwitz camp back when distribution via VHS was the norm.

But he and his staffers are blindsided.

So they actually believed that the GAE's Deep State will permit the first African-American president to go down in history as a one-term disappointment and failure?

before being outed as David Cole

I think it's warranted to add that explicit death threats from Zionist terrorist groups were the reason he changed his name and identity and left the US for a longer period.

Technically that part is true, yes.

As the demographic transition continues, middle-class White suburbanites (who are mostly Blue-adjacent liberal normies) will be a smaller and smaller segment of the young/youth cohort, and they are the only demographic that genuinely buys into Wokeness. I guess that's a part of it.

It's partly a matter of age. People generally don't change their prejudices and worldview after the age of 30. What you're exposed to between the ages 15 and 25 is more important than the same between 25 and 35 or 35 and 45 etc.

David Cole never denied the Holocaust.

Well yeah, it's true that the violent Bolshevik seizure of central power provoked a civil war between them and their enemies (not counting other aspects of the whole conflict). Nevertheless the toppling of the monarchy in March 1917 was relatively bloodless and swift, as was the dissolution of the USSR later.

Excuse me but what's the point of listing four qualifiers? Your question just becomes meaningless at that point.

It’s also true though that the existing Russian political system collapsed in a rather bloodless manner in 1917 and also 1991.

the more moderate activists got on with their normal lives, leaving only the most radical remaining, who in turn radicalised eachother.

That probably also explains much of the political unrest that took place in the young Weimar Republic between 1919 and 1923 or so.

Now that the Great Awokening is in decline, the normies are quietly removing the pronouns from their email signatures and taking down their Pride flags

It's probably more accurate to say that it was successfully completed. The youths that were indoctrinated and acculturated during the awokening are irreversibly woke at this point. Those who stopped virtue-signalling are the older ones who haven't received such indoctrination.

Isn't it important to ask in this context what was the last time a popular Republican was assassinated? Because I have no idea.

Americans are very focused on ethnic dimensions of the conflict due to their history but that was more of a class/power conflict than the ethnic one.

True. But it weren't Americans who invented the ethnicist narrative that has been mainstreamed in the West, it was Ukrainian nationalist immigrant activists in America, Canada, the UK etc.

Also both Russia and Germany had recently (in the last few years before the conflict) been in unfortunate situations that made them look like they had sold out their Slavic and Austro-Hungarian allies, respectively.

I'm not sure what you're referring to here.

The mainstreamed Atlanticist narrative is that the Soviet famine of 1932-33 was a genocidal policy of mongolized Russian imperialists masquerading as Communists specifically intended to exterminate the proud and ancient Ukrainian nation. It should be pointed out that questioning any part of this claim openly will earn you condemnation for being a Russian agent.

e.g. those "hands chopped off" pictures are something the natives did to each other and the Belgians actually tried to stop.

That part isn’t actually considered to be controversial at all. Leopold ordered a local armed force (gendarmerie) to be set up, commanded by European mercenaries and recruited from locals, with arms and ammunition being shipped in at great expense from Europe. As the officials were worried that the recruits would use the ammunition to poach local wildlife, they forbid hunting and ordered the hands of any killed rebel/saboteur/bandit/deserter etc. to be severed, collected and presented to command as evidence. Instead of suppressing poaching, this resulted in a black market where soldiers bought up severed hands from local tribesmen. It’s a simple case of perverse incentives. Everybody in power knew well that cutting of the hands to plantation workers for whatever reason is counterproductive and thus not to be condoned.

Has anyone seen the recent miniseries M: Son of the Century streamed on Sky? As far as I can tell, it generated little attention outside Italy even though the director is an Englishman and there not being many other subjects that could conceivably generate more controversy than the conception and ascendance of fascism.

I'm pretty sure it'd have been entirely possible to restrain and arrest her without resorting to lethal force. She was just an average White normie.

There’s a recent German-Slovakian historical drama entitled Führer und Verführer (“Leader and Misleader”) about the life of the infamous Nazi propaganda minister Dr. Goebbels. I imagine it only had a rather limited release in the US and the UK (it surely has no Wikipedia page in English). I thought the movie is well-made altogether but nothing new really – also the cast pretty much looks generally scarcely like the figures they are supposed to portray – with the glaring exception that Hitler’s character not once behaves like a raging lunatic and does not even raise his voice at all. (I remember that the movie Valkyrie was the same in this regard, but it also only showed Hitler on screen for no more than a few minutes.) I never imagined that I’d ever see a German movie like that. Can definitely recommend.

A jumped-up, corrupt demagogue fascist indeed, who pretty much only had a real chance of winning only because activist judges aligned with the EU/GAE Deep State barred another jumped-up, corrupt demagogue fascist from running.