@Celestial-body-NOS's banner p

Celestial-body-NOS

Why should Man not rebel against Nature, when Nature herself is in rebellion against Justice?

0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 05 00:16:31 UTC

				

User ID: 290

Celestial-body-NOS

Why should Man not rebel against Nature, when Nature herself is in rebellion against Justice?

0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 05 00:16:31 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 290

That analogy falls down when you equate the 'commons' to someone with feelings.

A not entirely unreasonable point. Our economic system gives too much leverage to employers; if Alice hires Bob, Bob has a lot more to lose than Alice does; thus Alice can make unreasonable demands knowing that: 1. Bob will probably back down first, and 2. if he refuses, she won't have any difficulty finding someone more desperate. If we try to patch specific abuses with rules like 'don't make sex with one's boss a condition of employment', we end up playing Whack-a-Mole as Alice keeps finding more indignities to inflict on Bob, and campaigns against any intervention with the argument that Bob 'voluntarily' agreed to her terms, in the same way as the victim of a highway-man 'voluntarily' agreed to hand over his valuables.

Under full employment, however, if Alice demands that Bob offer her sexual favours, or forgo safety equipment in order to work faster, or stand up for his entire shift even though he could do his work just as well sitting down, or answer his phone at zero-dark-thirty for something could have waited until morning, or refrain from eating rice on Tuesdays, &c. &c., Bob is more likely to leave, and, having done so, is less likely to experience financial hardship as he can readily find a more reasonable employer, while Alice, less able to find anyone who will accept her onerous terms, will be incentivised to be more reasonable herself.

In such a system, the libertarian argument that Alice and Bob mutually agreed to whatever terms would be much more likely to hold water.

That doesn't help the issue of people with empty wallets and full bladders/large intestines. If there is no legitimate place in public where people can relieve themselves without spending any money, everyone else will have to navigate a bio-hazardous obstacle course on the side-walk.

My recommendation:

  1. Tax businesses who do not offer public bathrooms (defined as allowing anyone to come in, use the toilet, and leave without buying anything).
  2. Use the revenue from the tax to fund (a.) subsidies for businesses who do offer public restrooms (as defined above), or (b.) construction and maintenance of free-at-point-of-use public toilets.
  3. Once there are plenty of places where one can empty one's excretory organs without spending anything, it will be much more justifiable to take strong measures against those who continue to No. 1 on walls or No. 2 on the pavement.

Also check for parasites; hookworm has been known to have adverse effects on cognition....

Strategic “divide and conquer” is a well-known tactic used to prevent group cohesion; anything which draws a wedge between white people or highlights differences will ultimately reduce the strength and chance of group advocacy.

Now apply the same reasoning to 'white people' wrt 'black people'.

And more Biden voters in Texas than there were in New York. (xkcd #2399)

With which Russia had also previously interfered (2004, Viktor Yushchenko).

The radiological hazard of depleted uranium is overstated; U-238 decays very slowly, and is sometimes (due to its density) used as shielding for more rapidly-decaying nuclides.

However, it poses a chemical hazard, as uranium is chemically toxic in a similar way to other heavy metals.

Russian propaganda mentioned it several times back during the Maidan crisis in 2014 and it was just as silly then.

Sillier, actually; I don't recall any noise among the Western nations about biting off any territory from Ukraine.

And if Ukraine had sought independence for the sole purpose of continuing to keep human beings as property (and listed that as the reason in their declarations of secession), I might concede that the Kremlin had something approaching the general neighbourhood of a point.

The central example of right-wing violence during the Trump era is a single riot where the only deaths were one of the rioters and a couple geezers that got too excited and had heart attacks.

Are you referring to the Diet-Coke Hall Putsch?

There was also the Charlottesville Massacre. (Kind of book-ends it....)

For what?

Last American clay gained on the battlefield was the Pacific Trust Territory taken from Japan, and we didn't start that one.

Note that Prince Harry is the great-great-great-great-grandson of a Russian Tsar (Nikolai I - Konstantin Nikolayevich - Ol'ga Konstantinovna - Andreas tis Elladas - Philip of Edinburgh - Charles III - Harry of Sussex).

Is "I think it's a good thing there are significantly less teenage pregnancies" bait?

Might reel in Stannis Baratheon or Weird al-Yankovic....

From the perspective of 1945? Yes.

The Boy Who Cried (Endangered Species of) Wolf?

The problem with that method is that, as armaments technology advanced over the XIX and XX centuries, warfare became increasingly destructive to bystanders who had been minding their own business until their governments decided that they needed a distraction from their own inadequacies.

If I recall correctly, their breakthrough was that they had a radar system small enough to fit on a plane.

he believes the USG obtained this stuff from aliens in exchange for 'letting them eat us like squirrels'.

Did the aliens have a book titled To Serve Man?

Lawyers can debate...

I genuinely believe this is the part that triggers so many people to feel the way they do about Luigi.

Or Dick the Butcher from Henry VI, Part 2, who spoke the famous line "The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers." in Act IV, Scene 2.

If we accept a broad enough definition of burning (I'm for the usable-energy-converted-to-entropy one here) - something burned to get the water up first, and to fuse the atoms we proceed to split.

But was that the definition @naraburns was using?

The steady pressure of cold electrons coming out of your wall outlet ... something, somewhere, still had to burn for it.

...except when it comes from falling water or splitting atoms.

Different people have different 'pinions; some like apples and some like inions.

the taliban were willing to cooperate to hand them over.

That's not how I remember it. I seem to recall that they were giving us a bunch of guff about them being entitled to a say in where and under what legal system he was tried.