@CertainlyWorse's banner p

CertainlyWorse

No one is coming to help. It's just you.

0 followers   follows 2 users  
joined 2022 September 05 01:12:53 UTC

One of the great unwashed.

Friends:

The boys know who they are.


				

User ID: 333

CertainlyWorse

No one is coming to help. It's just you.

0 followers   follows 2 users   joined 2022 September 05 01:12:53 UTC

					

One of the great unwashed.

Friends:

The boys know who they are.


					

User ID: 333

I think most here would be fine with reading slightly worse grammar and spelling along with the certainly that they aren't reading AI stuff.

Finally, my time has come!

These 'non-crime hate incident' investigations and other 'hate crime' investigations seem to be clearly directed at white heritage British and not at minorities. Its why there are claims of 'two tier policing'. There's plenty of YouTube clips out there comparing similar behavior between the majority/minorities and the differing official response.

I didn't see the need for American style free speech norms until I saw the path that the UK has chosen to go down. Other Western nations are struggling with how to respond with mass migration and multi-culturalism and suppression of the heritage majority seems to be cheap low hanging fruit for their governments.

Here's one where a guy got threatened with a hate crime for asking a foreigner to speak english fluently.

The larger problem is that England in particular has always used suppression of speech (See 'D' Notices) liberally to keep the peace. This was culturally supported as traditionally the English have by and large enjoyed their peace and quiet. This vestigial cultural limb has now metastasized into something else entirely.

I just don't think the UK govt has the funds to police itself correctly so it is using its traditional tool of suppression of communication instead of dealing with the root cause of ethnic tension and cultural instability.

Edit:

This was culturally supported as traditionally the English have by and large enjoyed their peace and quiet.

This isn't quite accurate. It's more because there was a significant degree of trust that such non-legislated 'powers' (which were more of a gentleman's agreement) would not be abused and only used in genuine cases of national security. It still created a cultural precedent.

Also London was known for having one of the highest known levels of cctv surveillance in times past. Again, this was a sign of great trust in govt and authority. It was accepted on the presumption that such things would not be abused.