@Gaashk's banner p

Gaashk


				

				

				
1 follower   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 05 23:29:36 UTC

				

User ID: 756

Gaashk


				
				
				

				
1 follower   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 05 23:29:36 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 756

That might be a genuinely interesting story.

Is it what the main character in Notes from Underground is suffering from?

I'm not sure what "Ressentiment" adds to the discussion, or why it looks like a fake French version of resentment, which is similar and widely understood. If someone is resentful about their impotency, like some of the characters in JD Vance's book, how is it helpful to add "ressentiment" on top of that?

Conservative women mostly aspire towards marriage, and are picky about religious groups, which clump politically as well. Like if a Catholic girl is a bit socialist, and her prospective partner is a bit into Republican coded Fait and Family stuff, but they both think they should listen to the Pope and bishops on serious matters, then that's fine.

It is obvious, because that's literally what matchmaking is about, thinking about the desires of both parties, and whether they will match up. That's why I referenced Emma, because it's a novel where the female protagonist thought too much about what she valued in her friend, rated her too highly in respect to marriage, and made a mess of things as a result.

The ick is probably from times and places where women were literally bought and sold, and didn't get to choose.

Yes, if he talks with his women friends about romantic matches and references Emma, they will probably be more interested and experience less ick.

"Market value"

Yes, it does seem like that would come across as crass in most contexts, like thinly veiled male locker room talk.

Many women have complicated feelings about being hot, attractive, or even beautiful, and are constantly policing each other about modesty. Traditionally, they should be attractive enough to attract a husband, but not so hot that men are constantly lusting after them. They should have kids while they can, but also at a respectable adult age. Most belief systems regulate these things quite heavily, and "SMV"maxers are defectors, scorned by other women.

Yes, something along those lines. For most men, that he is able to, and wants to, work an ordinary, predictable, man in the grey flannel suit kind of job while his wife has and raises children for a decade, then spends several more years training for and finding outside work.

That was my experience as well. I heard it. It was fun! I listened five times of so, and that was enough. Now sometimes I hear it and groan. That's also how I feel about "Golden," but since I have little girls, I'll continue hearing it for some time, probably.

(unattractive) men are expendable, mostly unwanted, dangerous, useless, and generally deserve to be lonely, poor, and depressed.

There are some different things going on.

Yes, men who act like depressed women are unattractive to women. Very clearly so.

You say that women's actions have changed, but men's haven't. That is untrue. Men's actions have changed from running an economy where most of them were farm laborers, and many of them are soldiers at some point in their lives, to one where most of them are doing basically the same work as women. It's romantically neutral to negative to work the same job as a romantic interest, but it's unwise for a woman to choose to try to attract an older man and become his tradwife, because there aren't actually that many such positions available (it's much harder to find a breadwinner husband than a job), he has to actually be extremely trustworthy, because being a divorced housewife is pretty lame even with alimony (it probably won't work twice), and they actually have to get along, we all live in nuclear families now.

Yes, of course a man who expresses that the particular woman in front of him is wonderful, and he would be so pleased to write her a poem, take her out to dinner, dance with her, and stare longingly into her eyes is more attractive than a man who expresses that she's fundamentally just acting out her sordid evopsyche roles, that she is in fact a cheap whore.

That's not to say that there aren't women who are achingly badly, or even that current social systems don't produce more bad action from women than some other systems.

Should we as a society do something? Should we pay women to be single mothers?

Paying women to be single mothers seems like a bad idea: children should have fathers. Not enough having involved fathers is part of the current social malaise.

Perhaps we should live in smaller social groups. The only time I've gotten romantic attention from men, and eventually found a husband, was through small social groups. It's not that women find 80% of men unattractive full stop. They find 80% of men who are strangers unattractive. If there are 10 eligible bachelors, it's much clearer whether any of them are a good match or not. I would like my children to be involved in smaller social groups, including in high school, college, church, and clubs as teens and young adults. Even modern churches are the wrong size! Many are tiny, weird house churches or enormous, town sized mega churches. People are meant to interact with about a hundred people or so, the appearance of infinite choice is going very badly. We've discussed moving to some more village like environments when our daughters are older.

Those clubs sound like they would be highly gender segregated. That's fine, I think basically banning gender segregated spaces was a mistake.

One of the things that people did in the past was to have tension between most activities, which were sex segregated (school, sewing circle, calling for tea, books, cigars, and talking about politics, etc), and a few activities, which were not (church, dances, dinners). Then the people in the segregated spaces are not datable, but those in the mixed spaces are. That seems probably better for romantic tension than the current set up where a bunch of people at work or in the robotics club or wherever seem like they might be datable, but in practice aren't.

That makes sense. School is long, it's a full work day, so if you want kids to actually engage with the clubs (unless they're high energy and in a sports club, but those are mostly sex segregated), you have to cut school. I like the idea of the Alpha School half day academics, half day clubs set up -- they aren't even loosing that much academic time, mostly just re-organizing it.

They still do in the West, where it's basically mandatory.

It doesn't sound like it's an option for most Eastern women anymore, either.

I'm not saying that the apartments are why Japanese people have given up on romantic relationships, but "Tokyo does it" isn't a strong argument when the concern is with family formation

Makes sense, that's how schools are as well.

My neighborhood has feral horses. They're fine, follow the rules, look both ways when crossing a street, and look after themselves.

Yes, it will probably take several years to change the system, so that the users are just uploading the documents to the AI assisted system directly, and you are guiding them through how to find/upload them.

My job is offering pleasant experiences to children. It is already not strictly necessary. I suppose in the future an AI could order the supplies and curriculum. Actually I would prefer it to to organize a more distributed system for providing experiences to children, so they aren't stuck all condensed with up to a thousand children in a single school, and some of them freak out about that.

I think it's probably driven by trait neuroticism.

My husband usually insists on driving, and offers a continual commentary on his perceptions of the other drivers and their lack of virtue. When I drive, he does offer a medium amount of commentary on both my driving and that of the other cars on the highway, though less than when he himself is driving. I am in general a much chiller driver, though he will back seat drive about opportunities to pass on a one lane road, to save five minutes over the course of an hour's drive, which is a matter of preference, but I am annoyed that he accepts my preference less than I do his. Also, he makes me navigate to new out of the way places he has found, then criticizes my navigation instructions, but won't switch positions. This has become much better now the we have a screen in the car that displays the map.

Here's a thought experiment: Suppose a couple is driving along and the woman starts back-seat driving. The man might say something like "Ok, why don't you drive?" (And this really happens.) In these types of situations, the woman typically declines the offer. By contrast, a man is more likely to say something like "ok, sounds great, pull over and let's switch places."

This has not been my experience.

I am a bit confused about it. I made about three images, they were cute, they were better than a Photoshop filter from 2005, but then what? I didn't want to print them or anything?

Do you hope to have kids? Does she?

Her having "meltdowns" under stress is concerning. Not just whatever's happening to her, but also as mentioned elsewhere, that you're calling it that. If you stick with her, and have a baby together, and she gets postpartum depression, and you have to be up every couple of hours bottle feeding the baby because she can't manage... will you be alright?

It's concerning that after two years neither of you is willing to move closer to the other.

My parents have been married for over 40 years. They meant in Dostoyevsky as Philosophy class, talked about their favorite philosophy professor all through my childhood, and have joined book clubs together. Every time I call my mom, she talks about some book they're reading for their club, and how they're proposing books and voting on them with their club mates. This is very sustainable!

My husband and I like talking about new places we visit, new restaurants, new experiences. This is a bit rough right now, with three young children, but still a large part of our lives. We had a day off last week, and found some new places that surprised us in a town we'd already been to many times. This is also fairly sustainable.

You and your girlfriend probably need to do actual things together, even if it's just attending an in person book club and bringing your physical books, and talking about your search through the local used bookstore to find copies or something.

Smallish but historical cities of the Southwest.

It doesn't have a bad reputation in comparison to other places, it just doesn't have much of an economic base. Maybe it's just the last place in the country for all the subsistence farmers' children to move to an apartment in town. Maybe the Intel plant is a bigger economic force than I realized?

  1. & 3 Possibly!They have a mix of old and sprawling. Currently they're building apartment complexes and the kind of subdivisions everyone else built in the 90s, like the city planners saw Phoenix or Houston and admired them. People are anxious about this -- there's even less access to water than Phoenix or Houston. My neighborhood is on water restrictions right now.