There was nothing wrong with my reply. He asked I give him personal information. I told him no.
The end of that conflict remains to be seen.
Yeah I don't disagree it sucks and is inconvenient and has risks. It's just they're allowed to make porn access inconvenient and risky.
They lost.
No thanks. I'm not concerned.
There's no problem, just you wrongly assuming I'm not a citizen by blood. I am correcting you. There's no need to try and fearmonger.
You're not very convincing, buddy.
I can say with absolute confidence not a single person in my life or my social circles has ever had an episode of psychotic violence. If you just snap and go postal, you're broken somehow, and must be banished. You are not safe, you are not normal.
Do you count the people who have committed that "pre crime" or not?
If you're showing signs that you're psychotic, you should be supervised for awhile, have your risk confirmed, and if it was a false positive, you can go.
Feel free to think that, I'm not interested in humoring foreign entitlement.
To be clear: I want those who are psychotically violent to be indefinitely restrained, and killed if they won't cooperate with the restraint. If for reasons of cost others refuse to let them be indefinitely restrained, I would prefer they be killed than released back into polite society to terrorize everyone else.
America is a collection of regional blood-tied communities -- at least, it was. I accept that rootless cosmopolitans have spread about and diluted themselves so fully they're not a people of any tribe or place, but blood is still the most important tie. Those people are just deeply unfortunate and damaged.
I stand by my previous post even with your additions.
I was born here through no choice of my own. But! I've been here for five decades, speak English fluently, have two houses, was raised in the Christian tradition, have paid millions in taxes, have never been to jail, have a white wife and two white children (three including step child) who are irrefutably citizens via my wife.
It's not your fault your parents fucked you over, and you did the best you could. But no, you're illegitimate. I'd be willing to fast-track you through the immigration system, but you'd have to go back first. Once exceptions start being made, they get made for everyone, otherwise.
Let also let me what you feel you've done to earn being an American citizen, btw.
Oh, I was born to two citizen parents. Citizenship is mine by blood.
The internet has always been open for all.
Well, no, it hasn't.
I get it’s not a right … but having to wait for someone to unlock the deodorant to buy it is annoying as hell.
Yeah, thieves suck.
"70% chance of further psychosis" is a crazy way to describe a person you think is safe.
Bluntly, yeah, all those people you mentioned I'm cool with indefinitely restraining and/or killing depending on how cooperative they are with restraint. These aren't normal people. Not even the one you call normal. I won't put a price on it, as these costs aren't fixed. The death penalty can be done very cheaply, for instance. We just don't do it that way.
That is correct, as I no longer value the law as a neutral institution. I am not concerned with cleaving to the law if the law destroys the society I want. And yes, Reagan's amnesty was terrible, and his biggest fuck up as a President. He's awful for it.
Blood is not water, nor is it magical. It's deeply physical. A people are tied by it.
Yes, I understand the strategy of letting them all in and then trusting the next admin won't be able to remove them. This is why I'm on Team Fuck The Law, Do What's Right, They All Gotta Go, and will accept any violation of law in pursuit of this.
We also give the crazy people guns, cars, and their bare hands.
If someone is unsafe, the correct move is to imprison them. Full stop, end of the line. The goal is not to maximize the autonomy of dangerous people, and that you think it is confuses me. If you're, again, one med cycle away from cold blooded fucking murder of an innocent person, you are not safe, you are a sedated predator. We should no more let you walk around than we would a grizzly bear.
If you were a progressive operative, could you imagine a way this decision could be turned against conservatives once you control the executive again?
How do I get my guns in deep blue territory? The recourse there is the recourse here. If the answer is "you don't", that's also the answer here.
So what? You don't have a right to easy porn, so even if an ID requirement is an onerous burden, onerous burdens are fine sometimes.
Immigration is probably the single starkest and most consistent example of something where the native population and the government continually operate in opposition. The government is aggressively anti-we in this regard. People continually, across the west, say they want less, and their governments bring in more.
No, that's less accurate.
We did seem to feel a little differently about it decades ago, though, when we had labor shortages, low public entitlements, and loved rubbing it in the faces of communists that people were desperate to leave their nations for ours.
Who is we? Decades ago, we were fighting over it still. There's always been a category of Americans who want to dissolve states and borders and peoples, but it's not all of us.
- Prev
- Next
You are wrong. If you want to punish me regardless, do so, but you cannot intimidate me into accepting a lie as truth. I survived the previous dozen plus bans, one more is fine.
More options
Context Copy link