As recently as the 60s Indonesia launched an anti-Chinese/anti-communist pogram that killed a few million people.
Wikipedia says half a million total and that the Chinese were "thousands".
Second link doesn't work.
I'm pretty sure most executives were white men prior to 2016 too.
Even if you have both number 2 and 3 together so that you are not applying double standards to Jews, this amounts to "someone who supports politics that I don't like should be put in jail and forcibly removed from power". "Getting the country into a war" is not special; in a democracy, people are permitted to advocate for policies that you consider harmful.
The Blair Witch Project was a successful low-budget film, and it managed to achieve fame even without the help of internet video distribution!
The Blair Witch Project is a special case because being low budget is inherently part of the story, which alleviates most of the problems caused by having to be low budget. This doesn't generalize.
The issue here isn't even Bari per se, it's the criteria defining the nature of the pool.
I wouldn't count "critical of wokeness without being outright MAGA" as a problem with the nature of the pool, in the sense you seem to mean. That's probably going to be the best you'll get if you're going through journalists--exactly what should the pool have been instead?
It also gives a lot of authority to religions, for instance Israel does not recognize secular marriage, thus effectively banning any gay marriage- as no faith in Israel officiates such unions.
Israel recognizes foreign marriages, including gay marriages.
Sexual harassment lawsuits?
And if the law is so restrictive that the arrest isn't legally wrongful?
- Prev
- Next

Define "good for". If you waste your life playing video games, but you would otherwise have starved to death, is that good for you? I would say that it is, ignoring semantic questions about whether "better" counts as "good".
More options
Context Copy link