@No_one's banner p

No_one


				

				

				
1 follower   follows 7 users  
joined 2022 September 08 22:22:12 UTC

Underemployed Slav. Likes playing Factorio.

Verified Email

				

User ID: 1042

No_one


				
				
				

				
1 follower   follows 7 users   joined 2022 September 08 22:22:12 UTC

					

Underemployed Slav. Likes playing Factorio.


					

User ID: 1042

Verified Email

He seems extra pissed at anonymity and posting how it's bad. Very incongruous with the rest of the stuff he is loud pn-

I suspect he was getting trolled real, real hard by some sociopaths, probably left wing. (bigger, smarter group of his enemies )

I'd not really fear SV that much, but what D.C. gestapo contractors and their opposite numbers in China are going to do.

With AI, the odds of automating zersetzung are approaching 100%.

It's much less disruptive than jailing people, and probably cheaper.

So I get downvoted because some Japan tier messed up porn genres, ones I haven't even heard of are.. not allowed on Steam.

Got it.

A term as broad as to be essentially meaningless.

Yes, being able to occassionally hit targets inside of Russia with small plastic drones or sometimes even an ultralight plane means "Russia isn't controlling its airspace".

LLM tier understanding on display from you, so bye.

When the word 'gooning' has been not only coined but escaped containment to the point fossils like Norman Finkelstein are aware of it, yeah, it's way past time.

Impaired brain development/functionality

Erectile dysfunction in <35 men has gone up from 2-5% to 20-30% in recent years.

Really no substitute for giving it a try. Just get a good hentai game(youtube link,sfw) and a free afternoon and find for yourself.

It's true for some people, at least, or possibly much easier for some people than others, same as alcoholism.

However, there's only something like 12 scholars publishing on it worldwide, and most of the research is very bad of the type "we handed out a bunch of surveys to a 60% undergrad female body" or evaluation of an "online survey".

The extreme difficulty of getting adult content published on major distribution channels like Steam or the Apple/Google app stores

Difficulty publishing porn on steam? I find that doubtful.

/images/17139872510847902.webp

What about.. the supply part of the army ? Driving trucks, working in logistics. Any part of that <100 km can be fatal on a bad day if a drone spots it and it's deemed a good enough target.

I prefer to err on the side of the wisdom of crowds and see 'past winners' continuing to buy 'winning' tech. Lazy and reductive, but its not like the history disfavors it.

I mean...do you? Look at WW2. Past winners prepared for a trench war. Especially in wars, looking at what used to win is just weird. There's been no good environment to establish what actually works and what doesn't.

As I understand it, NATO doctrine is really not well prepared for what's going on in Ukraine

In any case S400 has been directly used by Russia in Syria already, which is right next to Israel which has had F35s in the air since 201?, so the live data aspect should already be known to them

Russia is not firing them at Israeli war planes. Don't know what the etiquette is at locking targeting radars on IAF, but I imagine it's also not done there for obvious reasons (in a war zone, the logical thing is for someone to fire an anti-radiation missile the other way) so Israelis in F-35s wouldn't know if they're being acquired.

Later I thought of another reason for it : trying to pressure arm Turkey into buying Patriots or other NATO system. Looks like it's much more complicated:

https://warontherocks.com/2019/07/the-tale-of-turkey-and-the-patriots/

Turkey has been trying to build Patriots, but wanted some technology transfer to occur. Americans said no, won't let an ally license . So then they threatened to buy Chinese SAMs. Eventually bought the S-400.

It’s even funnier to think the US wouldn’t have air superiority against the joke of Russian capabilities we’ve seen.

I guess you haven't been paying attention to Russia destroying US 'smart' munitions, in flight, repeatedly.

They weren't 'outnumbered'. Russian invaded with 150-170k troops.

Outgunned, maybe not even that.

and are incapable of separating the US military being able to destroy a foe in a force-on-force engagement

The US military has performed very well whenever it has conducted force-on-force operations, in terms of both logistics and combat. We barely took a scratch.

?? Last time US managed to win a war against a peer enemy was WW2. And that was mostly because of massive material superiority. So making assumptions based on WW2, now, is a joke.

Yes, I know US navy is still based on ideas learned in WW2. That in itself is a big joke.

If you have less than a day of storage, you need back up power plants because calm winds easily last up to a week.

Point to how good multilateration is vs stealth please.

You want me to give you the kind of data that'd get you into ADX Florence or whatever its Chinese equivalent is ?

I think people are just full of shit. And when there's billions at stake, the incentive to deny and lie and hope it somehow works out gets irresistible.

Americans pointedly refused to even sell Turkey their F-35s because they apparently don't want it tested against it in a real environment.

https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/us-turkey-continue-talks-to-settle-f-35-dispute

S-400 doesn't phone home, no military system can afford to, so it's obviously they didn't want the problem where Turkish air defence troops find out just how good F-35 is. There's little justification for it. They just want to delay the inevitable.

Well, the Biden admin has been the gift that keeps on giving. Money well spent if you're an accelerationist.

I didn't think they'd do the title IX thing with trans, but it looks like trans BS is as irresistible to democrats as abortions are to republicans.

Wow. Imagine thinking US could do combined arms warfare in absence of air superiority.

Let's just ignore the reality of last years, that Ukraine is not winning but getting pushed back or that the US is unable to deal with an 80 IQ militia armed with a few Iranian missiles and assume it's 1991, it's always been 1991 and it's always going to be 1991.

And also let's pretend Ukraine is winning because you're giving them Stingers. Which you no can no longer make.

She also lost a bit of weight and got somewhat fit.

Sailer's was joking how funny it is that Spielberg has spend like a million bucks on luxury Italian shotguns but there's like 2 photos of him shooting one.

..didn't he donate tens to low hundreds millions of dollars to ensuring Trump loses his 2nd election ?

In my opinion, convincing someone to kill themselves or forcing them to kill themselves is morally the same thing.

If you are really going with "China depressed Uyghur TFR to 1.2", is suppressing their religion as being "genocide" then what's going in most of the world is also genocide. Religion is gone, TFR is in the crapper, no one is doing anything about it. The preferable solution is 'import people' to replace the dying out population.

What's true seems to be that a large % of their young males are in labor camps, there are anti-melee weapon measures everywhere (metal detectors, plastic shields, batons), there's a shit ton of police everywhere, much of them Uyghur. Strict surveillance, with people having to have tracking phone apps on.. (link worth reading, it's by a highly disagreeable person with no sympathies for either Uyghurs or Leninists.)

Which again, not nice, but unless they're getting worked to death on low rations, still not genocide. And with Chinese labor costs being as they are, I doubt they're not feeding them properly.

Now, not nice at all, but it's a just another case of 'fucking around and finding out'. Uyghurs failed to rein in their radicals, said radicals killed a couple hundred Chinese in machete attacks, caused the ongoing clampdown. Surely you remember the headlines? There was the big riot in the capital, then a half dozen big attacks in the following years.

All this 'stealth doesn't work' smugposting to portend the sheer stupidity of NATO in developing a white elephant

Carriers are also obsolete against peer forces who are just going to launch a hundred supersonic missiles at them a salvo of strategic air above to give planes something to dodge & overwhelm point defense and simply sink them.

That doesn't prevent them being useful against people who don't have hundreds of good ASMs on hand. That's why Chinese are building two.

If you can make a plane stealthy at a reasonable cost, it's still worth it, because it's going to make it a harder target against simple radar systems.

spam is cope when GBAD all requires a first track to be established by a radar station

Multilateration aside which is kinda not talked about much but probably works...

You ever heard of IR sensors ? Yeah, sure, you say you can hide a MW level heat source against the cold sky. No, you can't. Even Yuropoor systems like the Eurofighter have IRST that detects planes up to 50 km from the front.. You think China's unable to manufacture similar sensors and stick one on a high pole in every square 100 kms and connect them by fibre? You think unless there's total overcast, a stealth plane with a 3 MW engine on cruise can just waltz through ?

Detecting IR is 1980s technology. Most air defence now comes with it. America is refitting such on its older warplanes.

Stealth works against countries with bad equipment. That doesn't mean it's going to work against a sophisticated enemy.

By CNN metrics.

No, export models of Soviet and Western equipment armed with obsolete ammunition operated by Arabs whose average IQ is estimated to be 89. US army cutoff for recruitment back when there was a draft was 85. Anyone under that was just not worth having even in the rear echelon.

By CNN / newspaper chart metrics yes. By any actual metrics, no. It's a laughable claim.

Bogged down in the poorest European country

1 ) Ukraine isn't the poorest. Moldova is, iirc.

  1. you are eliding that Ukraine gets all the surveillance and espionage data it needs to use the high tech weapons it got free of charge. Patriots, ATGMs, NASAMS, Himars, Storm Shadow, hundreds of quality artillery systems etc. Enough to equip a large EU/NATO army.

From less high tech weapons, it got ~1000 tanks, 1000s of IFVs, most of its artillery shells and so on.

Poorest country except it got military equipment on par with the French army, at least artillery wise.

Without that help and those supplies, it'd have been over for Ukraine by fall of '22 probably.

  1. you're also eliding that it gets specialist foreign troops operating air defense and elint equipment. (no, they didn't train Ukes to operate it. It takes years of training just to get basic familiarity. )

  2. but a failure by any objective observer. Yeah, the initial plan A (watch the bribed government scram) was a failure.

Plan B, grind down Ukrainian army to the point they can't go on is ongoing. Even Americans are now admitting it's unwinnable.

But it is also showing how faithless Americans are. Despite all their big words, they're unable to even provide Ukraine with something as basic as air defenses. Richest country in the world can't or won't give out thousands of radar guided missiles. Could it? (honestly don't know, but I suspect it has thousands of Aim-120 which should be adaptable for ground launch)