@Roolb's banner p

Roolb


				

				

				
1 follower   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 05 01:28:29 UTC
Verified Email

				

User ID: 341

Roolb


				
				
				

				
1 follower   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 05 01:28:29 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 341

Verified Email

Funniest I've read in a while

Phones, phones and phones.

Yeah, sperm banks's assertions about donor quality seem dubious.

Once upon a time it was probably because Trump promised to do things for them (bring back factories, build the wall). Now they're behind him because he's under attack (for, they reckon, daring to stand up for them).

A story about the power of stories? Find me Neil Gaiman's non-union Mexican equivalent!

He's been giving every signal that he's serious about illegal immigration, no?

Yeah, ghosting is a way of saying "I might have a use for you later. Maybe not one you love, but ..."

I can't believe my education on this issue started with John Deere.

I think of this interview when I think of Putin's decision:

"... if you really look at the total message the US was projecting to Russia in those critical months, there were two messages. One is, 'We’ve got great intelligence on you. We actually understand you much better than you think.' It was shocking. I think it shocked the Russians. But on the other hand, we’re saying, 'We think you’re going to win quickly in Ukraine. We’re offering Zelenskyy a plane ride out of Kyiv. We’re pulling out all our diplomats and urging other countries to pull out their diplomats.'

The message, actually the totality of the message that we sent to Putin is, 'You are going to win if you do this.' "

https://conversationswithtyler.com/episodes/walter-russell-mead/

Just in: Chileans reject new progressive Constitution. An interesting chapter in the history of Latin American economic and political development. (The country's progress over the last few decades makes it one of the region's real success stories.) For my part, I suspect the voters made a smart call here, but are there Motters closer to the issue with actual insights? What will come next?

Clinton had all the wrong assets -- connections, deep familiarity, a track record -- for voters in the mood for shaking things up. The party bet everything on it not being what pollsters call a "change election." (Yet she won the popular vote and could easily have won.)