Turniper
17d ago
Sorry, which republican elected officials are groypers again? Which of their policies are dominating Republican discussions? It's the party of Trump, business interests, and cultural conservatives. Groypers remain years away from mattering and a Carlson interview does not even begin to change that. Joe Rogan has what, 40 times Nick's viewership? Sixty? Nick struggles to break half a million, Joe regularly puts up 20 times that, and has done 100+ times that. The only times I ever even see Fuentes mentioned in political conversations are on this forum, even my conservative conspiracy nut friends barely remember who the dude is.
Turniper
22d ago
I just use claude code. I don't think the modality matters anywhere near as much as the underlying model and the user instructions. There's definitely an art to prompting it well to get good output, by default it just surges forward along the path of least resistance. Good instructions, and cutting it off when it's beating it's head against a wall, are major force multipliers.
This is an excellent explanation for how the law works and why prosecuting attendees of one event was much easier than charging those at others. But it's also exactly why this controversy keeps finding new legs. Most people don't see 'Rioters wore masks, operated under the cover of darkness, and overwhelmed the ability of local police to gather evidence about who committed what crimes' as a reason they should get off. Guys who think the BLM riots were under-prosecuted don't usually have a specific theory of current law under which they should have been punished. They just think that if masked people burn down a local auto-zone, someone needs to be punished, and every failure to do so undermines the legitimacy of the legal system. You cannot legally reason someone out of a morally reasoned position.
More options
Context Copy link