@aeqno's banner p

aeqno


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2023 August 06 22:06:42 UTC

				

User ID: 2614

aeqno


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2023 August 06 22:06:42 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 2614

Somewhere in the world right now, some unfortunate young girl is being forcibly married off to some old, toothless geezer.

Do you think it's any consolation at all that he was a real hunk several decades back?

Famous people's attractiveness is usually judged relative to the time they were most visible to the public. When people think Audrey Hepburn, they think Breakfast At Tiffany's, not her retirement years.

Joe Biden was actually very good looking as a young man, but that's not people's mental image of him.

It would just be a re-run of the Soviet-Afghan war.

Some are now even getting paid in crypto.

I don't think Intel is relevant in the current AI race.

The context of OP's comment didn't involve considering academics in a vacuum, but measured up against a conservative majority.

When considered in strict relation to each other, there's definitely a fact of the matter when it comes to quality.

Who would you rather live next to, a randomly chosen elite college faculty member, or a randomly chosen MAGA?

conservatives are ~50% of the U.S. population, while academics are a fraction of a percent (or maybe slightly larger)

Quality > quantity.

  • -10

Could you elaborate on the difference? The armed forces personnel back then were more virulently racist and reflexively anti-Washington than probably most people alive today. And yet they didn't hesitate in turning their guns on their fellow Southerners in the name of racial equality.

You think some infantryman with a Lebron jersey in his barracks room is going to counter this trend?

When the Feds ordered military and national guard units to desegregate the South with armed force, they did so unquestioningly, despite those units being staffed by decidedly unwoke Southerners.

Perhaps. Just seems to me that in answer to the question of where to build a white utopia on a continental-sized landmass, they were like "Well, where are the black people"?

Why would you set this up in one of the blackest states in the Union?

The most salient lesson of the post-Cold War era: Get nukes or die trying.

A nation's relationship to other states, up to and especially including superpowers, is completely different once it's in the nuclear club. Pakistan can host bin Laden for years and still enjoy US military funding. North Korea can literally fire missiles over South Korea and Japan and get a strongly-worded letter of condemnation, along with a generous increase in foreign aid. We can know, for a fact, that the 2003 Iraq War coalition didn't actually believe their own WMD propaganda. If they thought that Saddam could vaporize the invasion force in a final act of defiance, he'd still be in power today. Putin knows perfectly well that NATO isn't going to invade Russia, so he can strip every last soldier from the Baltic borders and throw them into the Ukrainian meat grinder.

Aside from deterring attack, it also discourages powerful outside actors from fomenting revolutions. The worry becomes who gets the nukes if the central government falls.

Iran's assumption seems to have been that by permanently remaining n steps away from having nukes (n varying according to the current political and diplomatic climate), you get all the benefits of being a nuclear-armed state without the blowback of going straight for them. But no, you need to have the actual weapons in your arsenal, ready to use at a moment's notice.

My advice for rulers, especially ones on the outs with major geopolitical powers: Pour one out for Gaddafi, then hire a few hundred Chinese scientists and engineers and get nuked up ASAP.

I have no idea how the government could continue to stand

The current Israeli government continues to stand despite having apparently missed the invasion force massed on its borders.

His whole selling point on the foreign policy front was that world leaders would tremble at the mere thought of crossing Mad Man Trump.

If that's now shown as fantasy and Putin, Xi, Netanyahu etc. are ignoring him and doing whatever they want anyway, where does that leave things?

Why the "not in the middle of a riot" qualification?

So life must be pretty chill for US police.

What?

His take on Putin's interview with Tucker is a classic:

https://x.com/RichardHanania/status/1755750991964913902

I still go back to it from time to time.

Genuine question: Are you on the spectrum?

It's a form of overcompensation you usually see on losing sides.

my grandparents who remembered it clearly describe it as definitely on the way out

C'mon. It required actual military force to desegregate educational institutions in the South. That isn't a system that was petering out on its own accord.

it’s hard to function believing you offer no value while getting a paycheck

Private sector here, but this is me, and I'm perfectly fine with it.

Schumer: Under a shutdown, the Trump administration would have full authority to deem whole agencies, programs, and personnel “non-essential,” furloughing staff with no promise they would ever be rehired.

So the same thing that's been happening for the last 3 months?

Also, the fact that Medicaid remains untouched and the defense budget is actually increasing demonstrates once and for all that these guys were never serious about curtailing spending.

400km of steppe without big natural impediments

What's the Russian Air Force doing while this hypothetical invasion force is rolling across wide open steppe?

People are more worried than they used to be that the guy swinging the cane might be getting off on it.

Or, indeed, the guy getting the caning.