dr_analog
top 1% of underdog fetishists
No bio...
User ID: 583
dr_analog
top 1% of underdog fetishists
1d ago
Then get married and become a normie. Like it or not, society doesn't revolve around men having fun. You're not a kid anymore.
Brutal.
This is a stage of adulthood that a lot of men have trouble with. Maybe an identity crisis over. Life isn't fun all of the time, and it gets more unfun with time. People grow old and die. First your parents and then your older siblings and cousins and then you. You may as well learn sooner, rather than later, that life is still meaningful and worth living even if it's not maximally fun.
your disinterest in growing up into a normie probably says more about you than it does about society.
Indeed.
dr_analog
top 1% of underdog fetishists
1d ago
Is this what you're referring to? It says it happened in Germany so I'm not sure.
https://eutoday.net/german-woman-jailed-for-insulting-rapist/
dr_analog
top 1% of underdog fetishists
1d ago
I could see how maybe the police are idiots and leaving it up to them to try to interpret speech laws is a disaster. But the fact that convictions happen at all is batshit.
Yes. Just because I clicked on three random ones on X to look into doesn't mean I was able to exhaustively review the culture war claim "free speech is under attack in the UK".
The handful I randomly clicked on, the perpetrator seemed like he crossed multiple lines and the UK wasn't clearly crushing political speech.
Since it's being mentioned here, and because I trust TheMotte more than X, I thought I'd ask for the worst examples (and y'all delivered, thanks!)
dr_analog
top 1% of underdog fetishists
1d ago
There's tons of these, to the point that the claim "whenever I look into it the people are being so offensive to the point of derangement or they're co-mingled with violent threats or slander." is just gaslighting.
It was a genuine question. Not everyone has the time to exhaustively get to the bottom of every culture war claim.
This entire year for example I've seen reported /outrageous thing Trump did that violates democracy/ and then I spend an hour checking into it and find oh actually the thing he did was totally legal and I'm just so tired of this shit and now treat every claim as epistemically flimsy by default.
dr_analog
top 1% of underdog fetishists
1d ago
A man who was convicted and fined for setting a Koran on fire, while the man who attacked him with a knife while he was doing so only received a suspended sentence (the Koran-burning man's conviction was overturned on appeal).
Okay here's where I boiled over into rage.
Glad some of these are being overturned on appeal, I guess? Still, yeah something's fucked in the UK.
dr_analog
top 1% of underdog fetishists
1d ago
Thank you, I am now convinced free speech is under attack in the UK.
First time watch, not rewatch?
I never saw the pilot episode. This clears up a lot of confusion. In the later episodes when the prophets are speaking to him I had no fucking idea what was going on, not realizing they're entirely in his head and using figures from his memory to speak to him.
The most vivid episode was the one where they try to trick that... Romulan senator into believing the Dominion plans to attack them. But then he discovers the Federation faked the evidence and he's enraged and then his ship just ... suspiciously ... explodes and they were all oddly okay with this?
I guess also that episode where it cold opens to Worf having rough dry humping sex with Dax?
Gene Roddenberry passing away early in TNG is probably the best thing to happen to the show. He never would have let the Federation get so dark, though he would've probably kept the rough Worf/Dax sex scene.
I've been catching up on some Star Trek since I was a teen when a lot of these aired. And holy cannoli the first episode of DS9 has to be the heaviest ever.
Sisko is assigned to DS9 and is meeting with Picard about it. Sisko expresses this assignment isn't to his preference and Picard starts giving him the "Starfleet duty" lecture and Sisko erupts in his face saying to cut him some fucking slack, he is raising a kid by himself because his mother died on a ship that he helped the Borg destroy when he was Locutus. 🤯
Despite also popping Picard's bubble he makes it clear that he's not some career obsessed owned-Starfleet loser who uses it as an excuse to never start a family.
In addition to rebuking Picard, he's also a sensitive enough black man that he can cry on camera (while the wormhole entities ask him why he dwells on the memory of his wife's death) but he is still hard ass enough to blackmail a ferengi into keeping his shop open in exchange for not putting his nephew in prison.
A very different Trek.
Okay what's your worst example of free speech under attack in the UK? I see claims like this posted to X a bunch but whenever I look into it the people are being so offensive to the point of derangement or they're co-mingled with violent threats or slander.
dr_analog
top 1% of underdog fetishists
3d ago
Huh. I would bet the intelligence communities have AI that's absolute crap and that the commercial stuff is as good as it gets.
dr_analog
top 1% of underdog fetishists
4d ago
Maybe they're communist accelerationists? Best case capitalism collapses under the strain of all of the wanton grifting, worst case they can say they tried but failed but hey at least they got rich?
dr_analog
top 1% of underdog fetishists
4d ago
This seems like one of those Late Stage Capitalism style ads that were in the RoboCop movies, except these people are apparently serious?
Just gamble with your credit card bill?
Does anyone think this shouldn't be illegal?
dr_analog
top 1% of underdog fetishists
5d ago
Oh! Okay that explains everything. I thought you were talking about a private practice and my head exploded.
dr_analog
top 1% of underdog fetishists
6d ago
One issue I have when I solve math problems is that I've found that I have two threads going on at once. There's my primary thinking thread where I'm writing the problem out and evaluating it, but there's also another thread going on where I'm "voicing" the numbers and symbols in my head. Like it's just background babble. The problem is I frequently voice the wrong number or symbol and it confuses me into writing the wrong thing down.
I make so many stupid mistakes this way. I can't make it stop. The more I stress about it, the more I concentrate really hard on the problem, the worse it gets.
It's a genuine defect in cognition, IMO.
I kind of thought everyone struggled with this. And that this is what they mean when they say they hate math, but I had a professor point out that he saw I suffered unusually from stupid mistakes like this. It's not common but it's also not rare. He thought the fact that I wrote so big on my scrap paper to try to avoid getting confused was a tell-tale sign.
This isn't holding back my career or anything, but I did start doing mathacademy.com recently for fun and find I'm struggling in this way again.
Anyone know what I'm talking about?
dr_analog
top 1% of underdog fetishists
6d ago
The alarming part of the story is that one went to HR and HR sided with them, resulting in their caseload being reduced and moved to other attorneys. This person is now being paid the same as those other attorneys to do much less work, and because of the way it all went down, all those other attorneys are very aware of everything that happened.
Are you serious? I... didn't think it was possible for lawyers to hate money like this.
dr_analog
top 1% of underdog fetishists
6d ago
The FBI only recently got the go-ahead to use Palantir technology on the giant NSA databank of all internet activity to find the suspect.
'they kept clicking "solve case" with every new release of the FBI crime database software and this time it finally worked' is the most reasonable guess
The police don't have probable cause to search a suspected hitman that a McDonald's employee calls 911 over and says they recognize the guy from the news and then the police show up and think hey yeah he kinda does look like that guy from the news? And then they talk to him and he presents a fake ID and starts shaking if they ask if he's been to NYC recently?
You know what proves he was clearly recognizable from the surveillance pics on the news? The fact they caught the exact guy that was in the surveillance pics on the news!
I would hope they put handcuffs on him right there and at that point everything on his person is fair game to open up.
What should have happened if the suspect didn't talk at all and offered no ID and simply said "no searches! I want my lawyer! am I free to go?" over and over?
More options
Context Copy link