netstack
The horse embodies the wings a person feels inside.
No bio...
User ID: 647
Wait, Freddie thinks it’s a screwjob?
Revising my estimates down a few points.
I feel like I’ve fallen into bizarro world. People are bending over backwards to defend this guy, and it’s not even our usual mysogynists.
Huh. I think the “found God” strategy would actually work, since his main appeal was always to bring in conservatives.
Not that I expect him to take it.
Uh…me?
I think conscious choices are one of the main dividers between us and other animals. If you’ve seen a feral cat colony, you’ve seen the unfettered id.
how many posts have we had on here discussing how women put men through shit tests?
I think most of those posts fall somewhere between uncharitable and unhinged. I was under the impression you usually thought the same, which is why I was surprised.
Again, I don’t disagree with your assessment of the credibility.
Judge Judy ran from 1996 to 2021. I’m sure a lot of people approve of her…sass, or whatever. Does that qualify her as an inspiring hero?
I dunno, I’m sure someone would say it. But there’s definitely more than one kind of celebrity, and I didn’t realize Bourdain had that much admiration.
I see where you’re coming from, and I guess I’m just not convinced that the average voter decouples those two things.
Look, as unimpressive as I find the accusations…I’m really surprised to see this framing from you. We’ve got a lot of users who have said similar things in the past, and I could have sworn you’d blown up at them.
If the accuser is telling the truth, then it’s rape, plain and simple. That just happens to be a big “if.”
sexual warcrimes
Is this metal band name taken?
Maybe I was unclear.
The accusation represents new information unavailable to primary voters.
If that’s not enough to lose the general, they don’t need to drop him like this.
If it is enough, then his endorsement is worth less than nothing.
Therefore, they have no reason to drop him but keep asking him for input.
Man, that’s bizarre.
Hold on.
I agree that Russia feared NATO expansion into Ukraine. I would say that is adequately explained by the “five-minute adventure” model: if Russia thought the cost would be really low, the benefit of a puppet buffer would be easily worth it. Now that the cost is sunk, Russia doesn’t want to back down, because now it definitely gets a hostile neighbor.
What it doesn’t offer is any reason to prefer the cultural trauma theory. I don’t find it reasonable to say having Ukraine as a neighbor was comparable to having the Nazis on the border. That sounds like a post-facto justification, and a pretty silly one.
military wargame type considerations
What do you mean?
What? If it’s genuine, why would they do that? He can only drag down his replacement.
And so long as he denies it, what incentive would he have to help out?
That sounds awfully…charitable.
What advantage does the cultural trauma theory have?
Accusing your enemies of Nazism is a proud tradition in and out of Russia, so you’d expect to see it whether or not the leadership were motivated by such.
Moving your borders closer to NATO does not suggest a fear of invasion. Neither does draining your manpower and weapon stockpiles. Both of those things are more compatible with the five-minute adventure theory, though.
Play DS with DSFix but don’t use M&K. It’s just not worth it.
The advice for a shield is because a lot of the early Souls experience is about learning curves. Going glass cannon, or even just armor tanking, will send you back to the bonfire more often, slowing the learning. A shield gives you more opportunities to observe.
Once you have some system familiarity, it doesn’t really matter what you use because you will recognize the design patterns more easily. “That enemy looks like he has a window to attack.” “That would be a good place for a spike trap.” “I should kill the dogs first.”
Edit; I see you’ve had some experience already. Disregard me.
There’s hardly any shields with such bonuses. But he should keep it in mind if he wants to recreate The Build.
I suspect the Kuleshov effect.
Big if true.
I’m not going to jump on the hate train, since it’s firmly “too good to check” for a lot of people. Plus, you know, completely unverifiable. But assuming it’s true, this guy ought to be unelectable.
For those suggesting a ratfuck: do they actually have time to pivot, or is this basically tanking the whole party’s chances for Maine? Would that really be worth keeping a center-left populist out of office?
Have you ever seen anyone hold him up as such? Like, “I want to be like that,” or even “he had such an amazing life”?
Maybe this is generational, and I’m just not exposed to the Bourdain fan club, but it was easy for me to slot him into the tortured-aesthete archetype.
“Well, in 200 years Sam and Sam are going to need a Second Foundation. Guess we better get a head start.”
So I started reading this when Gwern posted it. Closed out partway through. Something about this sort of retrospective feels like a real…guilty pleasure? Voyeurism? Like I’m engaging in the kind of behavior that annoys me about Kiwifarms. Point and laugh at the bizarro cult.
Sometimes I’ll get sucked in to watching bodycam channels. Random police officers shooting violent criminals, that sort of thing. Usually censored—I’m not looking for gore—but still pretty macabre, no? Hence, guilty pleasure. If I had a real habit of it I think it would seriously skew my model of how policing or crime actually work.
So when I got that feeling reading this, I felt like I should stop giving it attention. Maybe that makes me a bad rationalist. “That weird cult which can be destroyed by the truth should be.” Guess I need to go do some reiki about it.
I’m not even sure I can find the extremist Christian scandals. There was YFZ ranch back in 2008/2014, but that was a weird branch Mormon cult compound. Also, it was raided by Texas; I can’t imagine they’d be any more lenient towards a comparable Islamic cult.
I assume you mean Child Protective Services?
I don’t get the impression that Muslims are getting extra slack when raising children, but it’s really hard to tell. Search results are fixated on England. What exactly do you have in mind?
I know one white guy who converted to Islam to marry his former grad student. No idea if they have kids.
I would make a distinction between representation in media versus around media.
Within media, I think it’s close to the second. I would not call it a “virtue” signal, implying insincerity; if writing a plot that flatters one’s beliefs is insincere, we might as well throw out most of the canon.
Authorship or creative control of media is more complicated.
Consider the historical “well-rounded” education, which often involved reading a bunch of classics in the original Greek or Latin. Experiencing unfamiliar literature is expected to have inherent value. Tapping into an entire world’s worth of traditions, rather than the most visible ones, should work at least as well. I personally find this argument very persuasive.
Now extend it to familiar traditions, but unfamiliar situations. Reading a memoir about an event 80 years ago. Reading a retrospective of somebody’s niche interest. Reading a reaction to recent events from someone who grew up in your country, went through all the same schools, but is of the opposite sex. All of these are giving you something that you can’t access on your own. Diverse authorship offers diverse experiences offers the modern well-rounded education.
Now apply Goodhart’s Law, accounting for all the people who would like to claim their work is unique and enriching, and Sturgeon’s law, accounting for all those who really, really aren’t. There we have it: the modern commodification of diversity. It’s a shame, but it’s not at all unique to this particular subject. Anything that signals novelty will get picked up as a signal, because novelty is the most important thing in (monetizing) art.
- Prev
- Next

Both of which sound more “math rock” to me.
More options
Context Copy link