netstack
The horse embodies the wings a person feels inside.
No bio...
User ID: 647
Judging by their previous games, they’ve never understood how to manage success.
I’m not sure what you mean.
I think moving the conference because their feelings were hurt is lame. I also think it’s orthogonal to the missionary spirit, in which immortal souls are supposedly at stake.
Has YT ever done anything else?
Serious question.
Mea culpa. Nine sets of scare quotes to say that this movement is inherently averse to consistency, with no comparisons to similar movements.
I think this is still awfully uncharitable. “Alternative ways of knowing” have next to zero impact on the vast majority of progressive politics. People can and do argue any number of progressive policies—police, borders, reparations—on the boring ol’ grounds of facts and logic. That doesn’t change when some jackass decides to mock mathematics for being too white.
Hosting a conference isn’t missionary work. They’re not shirking a duty to their flock or their fellow man by hosting it in Portland or wherever.
Your apostate acquaintance is a different story. Are you suggesting that the UMC ethos was responsible for leaving him unprepared?
I grew up as a casual Methodist. I can’t say I miss it. Perhaps they really failed to inculcate the fear of God.
I’m not surprised you could tell. There are a bunch of groups that just sort of make it obvious, but most of them don’t have a Pope. Homeschoolers, new Agers. Mormons.
Oh, come on. Nine sets of scare quotes to say this movement is unusually prone to contradiction?
Show me a coalition which has national reach and I’ll show you a contradictory mess.
Exactly. Precision manufacturing requires a lot of things to go right. Then they have to be provably right, which was a recurring problem for the Soviet system.
I think the latter danger is real but not for that reason. Comparative advantage pushed Americans out of manufacturing. We still produce excellent technical professionals*, but they have little incentive to start up an industrial plant. The money is in finance, pharma, software.
When I was in college, the perception of academia was already pretty grim. People were aware of the employment prospects and the shift towards adjunct professors. It’s hard to imagine it getting better in the last ten years.
I’d say cultural work has also taken a beating, though that’s even more subject to my bubble. This is a damn cynical generation. Are they really eager to fight over the last scraps of journalism? Of mass culture?
* I wanted to show this via bls.gov, but the data retrieval tool was “under maintenance.”
Probably not. As I understand it, China has been investing a lot of money into domestic jet engines for decades. The marginal opportunities from an active conflict are small by comparison.
Espionage isn’t going to be enough, either. The U.S. was literally collecting Nazi experts and still took years to integrate early jets. China has picked all that low-hanging fruit.
I remember reading an article about China’s difficulties called something like “why jet engines are hard.” It wasn’t the Construction Physics article, which focuses on the West. I thought it was older than this, too. If I find it, I’ll let you know.
This is a bad post. Speak plainly and see if you can manage to include something other than “boo outgroup” next time.
Three day ban.
Was he allowing for collective ownership of rentals? Say, publicly traded corporations. They’d probably end up as larger cartels, but in some of our worst housing markets, that might be an improvement. Might.
Renting out houses feels scummy, illegitimate in a way that renting office space or even apartments does not. I don’t know if I can justify that feeling. It might just be a lifetime of cultural conditioning.
But speculating on houses? Using them purely as a store of value decoupled from the normal economy? That part I hate and resent. We put so many fingers on the scale to smooth out the largest, most important purchase most Americans will ever make. If one has enough money, though, one can just…exploit that. Free ride on the distortionary effects. I wouldn’t mind seeing that use case disappear.
Maybe they won't endorse it because, you know, they don't believe it? Second-order consequences are for nerds.
The modal progressive believes that people deserve the same standard of living. When reality falls short, he blames the people with the most money and power. In America, that's usually white dudes, but anybody who does well enough gets trimmed out of the coalition. See Asians. The rest of the world imports their narrative from us whether or not it makes sense.
Sometimes, he gets a slice of that money and power, then drives himself nuts trying to bring the world a little closer to his ideal. Call it "neurotic philanthropy."
Look, I realize this metaphor is beyond strained, but that’s only true if they’re under orders. Clayton and Swinson walked into this minefield on their own initiative. They have no particular obligation to keep moving in a straight line.
It’d be different if they were, say, called as witnesses for a defense.
The average person with a "No human is illegal" sign on their lawn would never, ever, ever act like that.
More or less true. The rest of this comment is basically slander.
They see it as something like a shelter dog rescue that makes messes on the floor
There’s probably a leftist out there who would endorse the racist paternalism you describe, but that person is not an “average person.” The concept is so far outside the Overton window that it horseshoes around to the general fringe category.
even if they'd quietly have such a dog returned and euthanized
Oh, come on. It wasn’t enough to make a strawman of the policy? You had to have them killing puppies, too?
It's hard to escape the conclusion that they're just the most insanely racist people on Earth.
I don’t believe that you want to escape that conclusion.
Even professional-grade racists like Asians and Slavs don't usually hate themselves too.
Perhaps this is because “racist” is the wrong label for what you’re describing.
You’re putting an awful lot of words in people’s mouths. If those words are shocking and incoherent, if you notice you are confused, maybe they aren’t the right words.
Shit. This is exactly the opposite of what I was hoping.
I supposedly turned off DuckDuckGo’s AI features, but I am not sure how much effect it actually had. Google won’t even let you opt out of their summarizer.
Yesterday I grew really annoyed trying to source statistics on medieval crossbows. Every site was the same AI-gen listicle. Did you know crossbows were easier to train than longbows? Because I fucking did. I wanted to know the bolt length and weight, machine, not the single most obvious fact you can find.
Where are the Web 1.0 sites which exhaustively document one guy’s home testing? The blogs nerding out over graphs? The doctoral theses on historical records? I swear Google used to give you Google Scholar links.
Sure, but you’d have to pay me.
I don’t actually have much confidence in my fiction skills. It’s not something I’ve practiced. I could regurgitate tropes in your direction, maybe sprinkle in some memes, but I suspect modern genAI would outperform me on this task.
Do you believe that all taxation is theft slavery, or can some of it be justified?
Your arguments are fully generalizable.
OP did say “cooking for oneself.” I don’t think that’s ever been male-dominated outside of the army.
The editor seriously hopes that her toil may not have been in vain, but that her country-women may find just cause to be satisfied with the Model Cookery and Housekeeping Book.
That surprises me. It’s around $12 where I am, and I want to believe my cost of living is further from NYC.
I came away from that post feeling like you were really failing to model those movements. I channeled that into our resulting conversation, but I could see someone downvoting and moving on instead. That would most likely be driven by feeling attacked/insulted, a common enough response to being accused of lying.
Exciting! I’ve seen silencer shop around, but I didn’t realize they had cases in the works. I would very much like to get a can for .22 if nothing else.
That said…I didn’t think constitutional challenges worked like this. Does Congress cite the 16th amendment before laying out Title 26? If not, does the whole edifice of tax law evaporate? This is probably good enough for the 5th Circuit, but I would not expect the Supreme Court to buy it.
On the gripping hand, I’m not sure how much faith I have in a legal team which struggles to use conjunctions. Schoolhouse Rock, guys.
…and that’s terrible.

Definitely longer stays. You can see it in a lot of period fiction. Some of that comes down to social class but it applied to labor too.
Prior to rail access, you had coaching inns for travel and boarding houses for longer stays. I think this shaded a little more smoothly from “staying” to “renting.” You had flophouses (where nobody would stay for long if they could help it) all the way up through factory town lodgings or urban apartments. The big hotels take off once railways concentrate a lot more traffic in one spot.
I’m pretty sure individuals used to offer rooms more, too. Some of the quirks of Remains of the Day come from the butler protagonist staying at various private homes which operate more like a bed and breakfast. This is as he’s making a multi-day trip across…England.
More options
Context Copy link