site banner
naraburns  nihil supernum  7d ago (text post)   3590 thread views

Quality Contributions Report for November 2025

This is the Quality Contributions Roundup. It showcases interesting and well-written comments and posts from the period covered. If you want to get an idea of what this community is about or how we want you to participate, look no further (except the rules maybe--those might be important too).

As a reminder, you can nominate Quality Contributions by hitting the report button and selecting the "Actually A Quality Contribution!" option. Additionally, links to all of the roundups can be found in the wiki of /r/theThread which can be found here. For a list of other great community content, see here.

These are mostly chronologically ordered, but I have in some cases tried to cluster comments by topic so if there is something you are looking for (or trying to avoid), this might be helpful.

Particular thanks/congratulations this month to @Rov_Scam, who double-tapped two weeks and the Main Motte category this month, carrying nearly 20% of the total report. Some of you may recall that one of the ways I whittle down the list is, if you have multiple QC nominations in a single month, each comment included in the final report weighs against including an additional comment in the report. Nevertheless, the primary driver of the AAQC report is community feedback, and of the dozen or so comments @Rov_Scam had nominated, every comment included here was in the top ten posts of the month.

Quality Contributions to the Main Motte

@Rov_Scam:

@problem_redditor:

@comicsansstein:

@roystgnr:

Contributions for the week of October 27, 2025

@FiveHourMarathon:

Contributions for the week of November 3, 2025

@OliveTapenade:

@Hieronymus:

@Rov_Scam:

@BahRamYou:

@Amadan:

@BreakerofHorsesandMen:

@clo:

@Bartender_Venator:

Contributions for the week of November 10, 2025

@aqouta:

@Agentorange:

@Dean:

@Rov_Scam:

@FtttG:

@faceh:

Contributions for the week of November 17, 2025

@BahRamYou:

@teleoplexy:

@Rov_Scam:

@FiveHourMarathon:

@DirtyWaterHotDog:

@ABigGuy4U:

@Dean:

Contributions for the week of November 24, 2025

@self_made_human:

@FiveHourMarathon:

@Dean:

@thejdizzler:

@Iconochasm:

@problem_redditor:

@georgioz:

4
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Surprised my Years of Rice and Salt got AAQC'ed but not my OOTP post.

It is certainly interesting to see what catches people's fancy!

One of these days, I'm tempted to do a sort of review-post of the sort of trends seem to go into getting into the AAQC. A sort of 'So You Want To Write An AAQC...' tips / tricks / observations effort post.

My incredibly selfish ulterior motive would be to encourage people towards the sort of posting styles I enjoy, regardless of any statistical rigor.

I got one, and only one, AAQC a few years ago, and it was when I had to actually explain what I thought was an American, and what wasn't, and why I thought that.

Doomed to be a replyguy, I guess. There's worse fates in this world.

It was good stuff.

My only QCs have been for chewing the scenery over historical trivia. I cringe a bit when I look back.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats