@netstack's banner p

netstack

Texas is freedom land

9 followers   follows 3 users  
joined 2022 September 05 17:27:40 UTC

				

User ID: 647

netstack

Texas is freedom land

9 followers   follows 3 users   joined 2022 September 05 17:27:40 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 647

If I can show you examples of Ukraine supporters who can form a coherent argument, who don’t rely on shame or vibes, is there any chance you’ll be convinced?

In my experience, most of our moderation is chiding right-wing people for frothing about left-wingers. There are a lot more of the former.

I will admit I declined to moderate the prep comment partly because I wanted to argue with it. Perhaps that was a mistake.

I’d have gone with “PBR Hall Putsch,” personally.

We definitely have a tradition of fundamentalist religions, even though no single fundamentalist tradition holds sway. The theological differences between Baptists and Pentecostals and Methodists haven’t kept them from converging on various policy positions. They get the Catholics on board surprisingly often, too.

Other than that, you’re correct. The MAGA wing is positively gentlemanly compared to the kind of mass protests we had over Civil Rights policy, let alone the labor battles of the early 20th century.

There was a bit of a spike circa 1915. Noisy, yes, but there are a couple obvious suspects. I think it’s fair to describe the Second Klan as a cultural moment.

For reasons discussed previously, I think OP’s choice of Leo Frank is pretty disingenuous.

I’m pretty sure that indicated he was totally gone.

Hock my balls.

In all seriousness: this guy. I don’t normally share mod notes, but in this case, his final note says “unban him if he survives.”

Vigilante hangings were really having a cultural moment in that time period.

This is not a good thing.

We had a couple users who would bring it up every couple months long before that. Kulak might have been one of them.

The author’s blog was linked on the subreddit recently.

@self_made_human’s source suggests that it’s dropped to $40/month, better than most of these Medicare prescriptions. Probably fewer users, too.

I don’t believe the orgy is required.

You know what else isn’t cheap to your insurer? Anything on this list. Those drugs reach about 30x as many people as Prep (circa 2021), and most of them cost more per month.

If you’d like to complain about healthcare spending, there are plenty of better targets that don’t rely on baiting a disgust reaction.

It’s like construction equipment, but without the boring limitations of reality.

Tough luck. We’re annexing everything except Quebec, leaving the separatists as last stewards of the real Canada.

Hello, and welcome to the—oh. Not your first rodeo.

Please familiarize yourself with the rules, particularly personal antagonism and consensus building. What seems like a fact to you may not be so obvious to others. You should make your best case and convince them whether or not your opponent is nasty or horrible.

No, I’m not saying they’d let him do it. I’m saying they wouldn’t punish him for having done it.

For what it’s worth, my actual Republican Senator is Ted Cruz, whose tolerance for Trump is infamous. Ironically, he’s also Canadian…

Sorry. I shouldn’t have let myself get carried away on conditionals. We agree that Trump taking any military action against Canada is outrageously unlikely.

Be the change, I guess.

In my experience, the clever both-sides arguments are usually appeals to the status quo.

While I agree that action against Canada is laughable...that isn’t why.

When has the GOP actually sanctioned Trump for anything? The closest they got was when his supporters were literally occupying their offices, but all’s well that ends well, and there was more hay to be made complaining about Democrat show trials.

If Trump pulled something like this—and he won’t—there’s your model. Deny that he did it. Deny that he said anything about it. Deny that it was illegal at all. Also, they totally deserved it.

It really, really couldn’t easily happen.

Politically, it’s completely bizarre. Not even in the Overton window until Trump opened his mouth. There is zero reason for Congress to authorize an invasion, and zero process for secretly preparing one as a fait accompli.

It’s slightly more plausible that an unhinged President could approve special forces raids or even airstrikes. The military is much more ready to enact something like that on short notice. It’s still incredibly stupid, pointless, and not going to happen over a tweet.

Judging by your past commentary, you probably could have stopped before the apostrophe.

I don’t think you’re necessarily wrong about his position as a beggar, but I also doubt it would be an effective tactic. It’s not going to win him more support from his base, more materiel from his backers, or better terms from his enemies. He gains more by playing the confident, defiant underdog.

By the Builder, you’ve figured me out.

Less-than-maximum opposition is still opposition, though. Compare abortion clinic picketers, or Israel boycotts.

You can take this response elsewhere.

One week ban for yet another low-effort zinger. Just because it's snappy doesn't mean it actually adds value.

How is that not acting against?

How many people, knowing that information, would say that it's important for the President to spare these guys from execution?

I dunno, how many Catholics are there? Obviously they don’t all support abolishing the death penalty, but it’s clear that a significant fraction do. They’ve got coherent reasons and everything. How are you so sure that they’re the ones endorsing evil?

Would you be more or less angry if he’d blanket-commuted all 40?