I randomly stumbled across that series at the library as a kid and read at least the first couple books. It definitely would not get published today, just due to the premise being anathema to mainstream publishing houses. For context, the series is about a group of young Australians essentially engaging in guerilla warfare and sabotage against foreign invaders (from unspecified countries in Southeast Asia). Looking at the critical acclaim at the time is a fascinating window into the discourse in the '90s and early 2000s.
Edit: Just to be clear my recollection is that the author really tried to avoid racial and geopolitical issues to the point where I found it somewhat confusing and unrealistic. He mostly focused on the characters and their struggle to survive under occupation. The premise is what would make it unpublishable, not his execution of it.
odd_primes
2mo ago
Weird, scrolling through the best-selling books list on Wikipedia Matilda is a fair amount behind both James and the Giant Peach and Charlie and the Chocolate Factory when it comes to Dahl books, not to mention the movie adaptations for the latter.
A couple other contenders post-WW2 are Charlotte's Web (1952) and Watership Down (1972). A lot of the bestsellers in the '80s and '90s seem to be series like Goosebumps, Nancy Drew, and such.
odd_primes
2mo ago
It's kinda lame since like you said, 75% of penalties are converted. The keeper has to both guess right and commit early enough to intercept it. The trick really just relies on the fact that the keeper is in such a bad position that they have to commit early in order to have a chance.
Then again my opinion is colored by hating the dynamic where games sit at 0-0 only to be decided by a penalty shot.
odd_primes
3mo ago
Usually they can't because when they sign a contract for credit card processing, they have to agree not to offer a lower price for debit/cash. It's pretty normal in some countries like Australia to have a credit card surcharge though. In Australia the surcharge is capped at the cost for the merchant to accept that payment method, which seems pretty reasonable. That way there is actual price pressure to cut interchange fees.
odd_primes
3mo ago
I picked up MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries over the holidays, overall it's pretty fun. It's the first installment I have played in the series though so I can't really give a comparison to other iterations.
Pros:
- It's just viscerally satisfying to pilot a giant robot around and blow stuff up.
- They do a great job with the sound design and feedback from stepping on things, firing weapons, etc.
- It's fun to customize mechs in various ways, the shotgun Kintaro build is great.
- The career progression is overall pretty good, with missions unlocking new, bigger mechs in a somewhat random way.
Cons:
- The AI teammates are a bit slow in the head, they make up 3/4 members of your squad but often do under half the damage.
- The standard missions get a bit repetitive (although to be fair the story ones are decent).
- Walking distances... Bigger, more powerful mechs are slower, but the mission maps stay the same size. This started getting pretty annoying later on in the campaign.
odd_primes
3mo ago
This case looks a lot more justified than Babbitt. Accelerating a vehicle towards a police officer is an imminent threat of death or serious harm, while Babbitt was unarmed and did not present an immediate threat to anyone. The officer could have used force, but I don't think they were justified to use deadly force given the circumstances.
The OSS published a field manual about this for WW2 resistance fighters. It mostly focuses on practical, low-level resistance and sabotage rather than grand acts though. Amusingly one of their suggestions is simply to be annoying and incompetent.
A non-cooperative attitude may involve nothing more than creating an unpleasant situation among one’s fellow workers, engaging in bickerings, or displaying surliness and stupidity.
It also depends how you calculate impact. For example the idiot who tried to smuggle bombs in his shoes has probably caused hundreds of aggregate human lives to be wasted by the delay of every air passenger now having to remove their shoes, despite his attack being completely unsuccessful.
odd_primes
3mo ago
Apparently there have only been 54 recorded homicides of US judges since the 1800s, and that includes homicides that were not work-related. Also I really doubt an elderly liberal lady in Milwaukee owns firearms in the first place, just based on gun ownership demographics.
odd_primes
3mo ago
I'm not surprised it went to trial, my bet is that it came down to the issue of Dugan continuing to serve as a judge and the two sides could not reach an agreement on that point. If the prosecution's offer was Dugan resigns and pleads to a misdemeanor, she really did not have that much to lose. She is retirement age and the only real impact of the felony conviction will be to force her to step down or get impeached. For a first time non-violent offense, she will almost certainly get no jail time, plus now she will get to do a #resistance martyrdom tour, and quite possibly get a pardon in three years.
odd_primes
4mo ago
The piece addressed this point as well. Based on the stats white men did not migrate into other high-status fields like medicine, law, and tech, likely because of the same discriminatory hiring practices.
The white men shut out of the culture industries didn’t surge into other high-status fields. They didn’t suddenly flood advertising, law, or medicine, which are all less white and significantly less male than they were a decade ago. White men dropped from 31.2 percent of law school matriculants in 2016 to 25.7 percent in 2024.
The shift in medicine has been even more dramatic. In 2014, white men were 31 percent of American medical students. By 2025, they were just 20.5 percent—a ten-percentage-point drop in barely over a decade. “At every step there’s some form of selection,” a millennial oncologist told me. “Medical school admissions, residency programs, chief resident positions, fellowships—each stage tilts away from white men or white-adjacent men… The white guy is now the token.”
Nor was tech much of a refuge. At Google, white men went from nearly half the workforce in 2014 to less than a third by 2024—a 34 percent decline. In 2014, at Amazon, entry-level “professionals”—college graduates just starting out—were 42.3 percent white male. These were the employees who, if they’d advanced normally over the next decade, would be the mid-level managers of today. But mid-level Amazon managers fell from 55.8 percent white male in 2014 to just 33.8 percent in 2024—a decline of nearly 40 percent.
odd_primes
4mo ago
Yeah, that was definitely a weak point in the piece. Minorities and women clearly benefit from these discriminatory hiring practices and are often fervent advocates for their continuation and expansion, they share at least some responsibility for this situation. Old white men didn't just suddenly wake up one day and decide to throw young white men under the bus for no reason at all.
odd_primes
4mo ago
Of course the author will focus on the institutions with the most cultural prestige and influence - they are the tastemakers that set the bounds of appropriate conduct for everyone else. If Ivy League colleges are discriminating against white men, guess where administrations at less prestigious colleges will take their cues from? And guess who built the ideological framework that the HR lady at that forklift company will use to implement a DEI policy to discriminate against white men? Like with the Harvard racial bias in admissions case, tactically it makes the most sense to try to make an example out of the most prominent offender.
Also when writing for a national audience, you need a topic and subjects of national relevance. Ivy League colleges and the media conglomerates that decide what you see on TV are household names across the country, random small businesses are not.
odd_primes
4mo ago
Its frustrating when older white men in powerful positions in institutions enthusiastically support policies that would have prevented themselves from being successful, had the policies been in place when they were younger…
It really grinds my gears as well. I had a conversation with an older white male physics prof at a social event a while ago, and he was giving this rather sanctimonious monologue about all the work they were doing to make the field more "diverse", and how they were rectifying the issues that led to women being excluded from the field. Of course he isn't giving up his job to a 60 year old women who was passed over for tenure in the '80s - but he apparently thought it was perfectly reasonable to have a lab with exactly one token white guy. It's just perpetuating the same problem on another generation, with different victims.
Compact published a quite thorough analysis of the discrimination millennial white men have faced since the mid-2010s, focusing on the liberal arts and cultural sectors. It does a good job of illustrating the similar dynamics at play in fields including journalism, screenwriting, and academia, interviewing a number of men who found their careers either dead on arrival or stagnating due to their race and gender. It's a bit long, but quite normie-friendly, with plenty of stats to back up the personal anecdotes. It also does a good job of illustrating the generational dynamics at play, where older white men pulled the ladder up behind them, either for ideological reasons or as a defense mechanism to protect their own positions.
A great quote from near the end of the piece that sums it up:
But for younger white men, any professional success was fundamentally a problem for institutions to solve.
And solve it they did.
Over the course of the 2010s, nearly every mechanism liberal America used to confer prestige was reweighted along identitarian lines.
Edit: typo
odd_primes
4mo ago
Here's a compendium of a bunch of different articles and papers about HBD: https://www.humanbiologicaldiversity.com/
Richard Lynn's work is one good starting point. It has been quite a while since I have gone down the HBD rabbit hole though, it's one of those topics that eventually got tiresome to argue about. Talking to some blank slate proponents feels like arguing with a young earth creationist, no matter how good the evidence is, they will find a way to make a "god of the gaps" style argument for nurture, education, or whatever.
I think the Indian discourse has really taken off due to increasing exposure to Indians in the workplace for white-collar workers (both through H1-Bs and outsourced teams), combined with increased abuse of visa systems that allows for lower-quality migrants to enter western countries. There is an entire industry built around facilitating Indian access to Western labor markets, often through dubious or outright fraudulent means. For example Canada rejected 74% of Indian student visa applicants in a recent crackdown on rampant visa fraud, and significantly reduced its student visa caps, particularly for low-quality degree mills that were being used as a backdoor immigration route.
The main issue I have seen in the workplace and academia is a high-trust vs. low-trust culture clash, combined with pretty blatant ethnic nepotism. To be clear, this problem is most acute among those born and educated in India. Second-generation Indian immigrants tend to have fewer of these issues, in my experience.
Grad school was an eye-opening experience. I flagged a number of cases of pretty blatant plagiarism while marking computer science work, which disproportionately involved Indian students. Most of those cases just resulted in a warning or a slap on the wrist, despite the academic integrity code proscribing significantly harsher penalties. We also had a case where an Indian student in my department likely faked a result for a paper in a pretty blatant way (his code could not reproduce the results he put in his draft) and another where an Indian student working on a textbook chapter plagiarized large sections of material from existing published resources. Both were caught before publication and handled in-house, the first guy was just told that he could not publish the paper without reproducible results, and the second was sent on remedial academic integrity training after he used the "cultural differences" defense. Sure, it's a low sample size, but the number of issues from the relatively small Indian student population was pretty jarring.
This trend continued in the workforce. One of my first jobs during college was working for an IT consultancy owned by an Indian immigrant, and it was a complete shitshow of wage violations, borderline fraud, and ethical violations that made me quit after a couple of weeks. Later in my career, I briefly had the misfortune of working for a company in the process of being hollowed out by Indian outsourcing. We would send the offshore teams requirements, and they would either send back garbage that didn't work or nothing at all. The most frustrating part was that they would often not even admit it - they would just say "yes we did the needful, the code is done" and sometimes it wouldn't even compile, or it was missing half the features required. It was legitimately maddening and I found a new job as soon as possible. Of course management declared the offshoring a huge success, gave themselves all bonuses, and presumably hopped to new jobs while the company crashed and burned in the background. I have also been in the industry long enough at this point to know that an Indian management chain is a big red flag - a few Indian employees is no big deal, but if it's 100% Indian.... I have seen some absolutely comical listings for jobs that I'd be overqualified for, but they are very clearly written with the intention of excluding everyone except the visa applicant they want to hire. The "Indian exec hiring co-ethnics" bit mentioned below is absolutely true in my experience as well, that's the one thing from the "izzat" post that really matched my experience - I have seen the demographics of entire departments change with astonishing speed with just one or two Indians inserting themselves into the hiring process.
Honestly Indians in the US should be on the front lines of demanding an immigration moratorium from India and the termination of the H1-B program. The level of annoyance and exhaustion has hit critical mass and has now entered the cultural consciousness, and I doubt it's going away anytime soon unless some significant policy changes happen.
A woman was sentenced to 31 months imprisonment for making the following tweet in the aftermath of the Southport mass stabbing, where three children were murdered:
"Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the b******* for all I care... if that makes me racist so be it."
She regretted it and deleted it four hours later, but that didn't stop the UK bobbies from scooping her up to meet their quota for the month. While distasteful and based on erroneous information (the perpetrator was in fact a second-generation African migrant, not a recent arrival residing in a migrant hotel), this tweet would be perfectly legal in the US. Throwing housewives in prison for years, for getting a bit heated online after a terrorist attack, is absolutely insane. It's even more ludicrous when considering how the UK police claim they don't have the resources to investigate rapes, burglaries, and other actual crimes that actually impact citizens' day-to-day lives.
odd_primes
4mo ago
France and Germany have crushing social welfare ponzi schemes that require an ever increasing number of young people. They need immigrants.
Denmark has pretty conclusively proven that MENA migrants are a net drain on the state, not a benefit. Sure there are a few winners: slumlords, the migrant industrial complex, and people who own shares in the discount retail sector.
odd_primes
4mo ago
From the press release, it sounds like the cash back on each purchase is dynamically determined by some sort of mini-game. Normally credit cards have fixed rewards - eg. 3% back on groceries, 2% on gas, 1% on everything else. I think the idea here is that instead you'd have a small chance of getting a large discount by playing a digital slot machine or something, averaging out to the industry standard of 1-2% cash back over the long term. But gamified in a way designed to be addictive.
The other issue is whether this is the thin edge of the wedge - once you've normalized your customers gambling for discounts, why not integrate it with an actual online gambling platform?
It makes more sense when you realize that many master's programs are just busywork to justify a student visa and a follow-on graduate STEM OPT work permit (two years that can be converted to a green card or H1).
They are optimizing for the user experience of someone who wants the fastest, lowest effort way to get entry into the US white collar labor market, not actual learning.
odd_primes
4mo ago
This post on "izzat" an Indian cultural honor system, went viral recently. I know we have at least a few Indian users here - how accurate is this characterization? Of course it's probably hard to generalize too much given the fragmented nature of India along cultural, linguistic, religious, and ethnic lines.
Here is the text in a non-image format from /r/askindia - the wide range of responses is interesting.
odd_primes
4mo ago
What I'm surprised by is why nobody has so far mentioned what, to me, seems the obvious compromise - we just shorten the work week! As our forefathers did forcing a 5 day, 8 hour work week, why don't we continue there? Go down to a 4 day work week, and/or shorten standard working hours to 6 per day?
Because it's significantly less effective for knowledge workers. As an analogy, consider Amdahl's Law for parallel computing. The amount by which you can parallize a task is limited by the non-parallizable component. Except it's even worse for team projects, where the non-parallizable component is the meetings and coordination between teams, and that is a function of the number of people added to a project. The more people working on a project, the more overhead you have in coordinating their work, and the lower the marginal value of each additional IC. Often one talented guy working twelve hour days can outperform a team of 5-10 people, just because he has a compete mental model for the state of the project, and can just do things without spending hours in discussions and consultations.
odd_primes
4mo ago
So your claim is that the Taliban regime ca. 2004 was the obvious Schelling point for Afghans interested in the long-term thriving of their country, and those who did not support the Taliban were clearly defecting from the common good of the country?
No. I just don't think they are demonstrating qualities that would make them uniquely valuable citizens, worthy of being fast-tracked through a special process. We have plenty of carrots and sticks for dealing with collaborators: money, status, security... And if we want our local collaborators to be effective, they should be invested in the success of our effort for the long haul. If their plan is to be on an evacuation flight out, why not staff the army with soldiers who only exist on paper, and rob the treasury blind?
odd_primes
4mo ago
There is a line in the sand for collaborating with a foreign invader to depose your government and occupy your country, which comes with unavoidable mass murder and atrocities. For Afghanistan, the death toll is estimated at around 200,000, along with the displacement of millions. The government actively trying to genocide you certainly crosses that line. The government enforcing a strict interpretation of Islamic law? That's a lot more questionable. Even a shitty government is often better than a foreign occupation and a low-intensity insurgency. Collaborating means obtaining a personal benefit from and enabling a process that imposes mass suffering on one's countrymen. I think the willingness to do so should be considered an anti-signal when it comes to citizenship, and certainly not an automatic qualification.
Tactically autonomous vehicles are a big problem for public transit advocates because cars are much more labor-intensive, and yet still overwhelmingly preferred. Eliminate the need for drivers and instead of cheap bus routes, you will end up with a bunch of low-cost Uber Pools outcompeting the public transit system by doing point-to-point trips more quickly and in a safer, more comfortable environment.
So for anyone who is a public transit activist for environmental or aesthetic reasons, this is a disaster because they lose their best arguments for convincing moderates (cost and efficiency).
More options
Context Copy link