pusher_robot
PLEASE GO STAND BY THE STAIRS
No bio...
User ID: 278
Yes. It's adjacent to "hiding one's power level", as even if you have some political beliefs, you understand there's nothing positive that can be accomplished by talking about them in social situations. And in many cases, simply choosing to talk about it less actually causes you to care less, and happiness increases as a result.
I don't know, but that's at least relevant information.
Whether this charge is actually true can be debated separately, with no reference to Pretti's character or past actions.
This is not correct. If you're trying to assess the reasonableness of an officer's belief that someone's actions created an fear of imminent death or great bodily harm, you would have to take into account knowledge about that person's behavior and past actions that the officer actually possessed at the time of the decision point.
The central problem remains: it doesn't matter what the law says, if future administrations decide to not enforce it.
I thought their home country refused them, as would be sensible for known criminals
I always heard in the US it was due to the huge surplus of Union Army uniform elements after the end of the Civil War when professional police forces were getting organized.
I'm arguing the state should exercise discretion in punishing crimes
We tried that, and look where it got us. If there is a better option, I don't know how to achieve it without writing it into law and enforcing it rigorously.
In 2025, there were roughly 15,000 violent crimes in the entire state of Minnesota. Let us assume all of them occurred in Minneapolis, all of them were committed by a different illegal immigrant who was immediately released on bail or sentenced to ten minutes by liberal activist judges and then released, and all of those illegals reside in Minneapolis today. 170 murderers, 2159 rapes, 2836 robberies, 9826 aggravated assaults, all of them committed by a different illegal immigrant who is now at large in Minneapolis.
ICE has deployed approximately 3000 federal agents to Minneapolis. Supposing ICE is in fact, after the bad guys, they should probably be done by now, because they only had to arrest five people each in order to get all of the highly criminal illegals out.
This doesn't make sense to me. Why is 2025 a relevant time period? If someone commits crimes in 2016 and is still in the country with a valid final order of deportation, they should be allowed to stay? It's important to remember that deportation is not a punishment. Deporting people with final orders and criminal records is about prioritizing removal of people who have demonstrated that even beyond immigration law, they are not willing to comply with our rules. The rest also have no just cause or right to stay, but their removal is less urgent if they are avoiding victimizing other Americans.
I am not sure there is a statue against annoying and frustrating law enforcement. Perhaps if they coordinated to prevent the arrest of anyone specific, that could be an obstruction charge.
There are definitely local laws against stalking and harassment, and obstruction of law enforcement does not need to be physical. However, it seems extremely unlikely that charges will be pursued.
There might be an independent causal factor.
Summer: Gin and Tonic
Autumn: Brandy Old Fashioned
Winter: Hot tea toddy
Spring: White Russian
After a discussion with work colleagues about old games that hang around, I fired up EVE Online for the first time in about 15 years. I remember trying it briefly, finding it far too dull, and moving on. But coming back to it now at a different point in my life, it definitely hits differently. It looks nice and it has a variety of progression options, but it also doesn't demand twitch reflexes and fast reaction. You can choose to do things that take time but not much attention, or things that require attention and go faster. I'm certain I've slowed down considerably and it matches my pace a little more. I think I might stick with it for a little bit
True - I was assuming for some reason they were only recording deltas but it's hard to imagine there wouldn't be some measurement against a baseline. ETA: I guess if that's the case, then I don't understand how it would be possible to disregard measurements under the "less than 1/8 inch" policy and have them end up moving to the point of failure, unless through complete dereliction.
I am not an expert on railway safety but presumably there is some tolerance for these gaps, below which changes are not concerning.
Changes are essentially summed vectors. 1/8" or less of a change from month to month is almost never going to be a problem. 10 of those negligible movements in a row, in the same direction, is a massive problem! But if you didn't update the documented measurement, because each time you checked, it had changed 1/8" or less, you would never even know that your position had drifted by an entire inch from your documentation. The only non-negligent way I can think of to track the sum of many small vectors is to record the actual measurement every time.
When he says he doubts we will come to america's aid, insult aside, that means america possibly won't come to ours.
This is reality. Trump is dispensing with some of the polite fictions because they are distorting peoples' perception of actual reality. In reality, there are not many scenarios where Europe can possibly come to America's aid in any substantive way other than moral support, regardless of treaty obligations. That's Europe's choice, and for better or worse it makes them a much less valuable ally.
All of those would rapidly result in the whole world looking for a better deal with a new protector.
By their own admission, they are already doing this. American forbearance is so implicitly assumed that this is not anticipated to have any further negative consequences, I guess.
Every since I dabbled in chainmail fabrication, I've been tempted to learn crochet, but I can't offhand think of a less manly thing for a man to attempt, including having sex with other men.
[intended reply]
I think we need to be able to make policy around the Greenland territorial waters. Exactly who is allowed to do what there under international law is immensely consequential.
That genuinely would be a casus bellum though
Buy a boat and take it out boating. It will easily suck up any spare time, money, ambition, and desire. Bonus: you can wear a captain's hat.
True, but the original streetcar suburbs have largely been absorbed into the major metro areas they once sat outside of. The outer ring suburbs came after the construction of the freeways and the days of rage
Generally, if they're cooperative enough to unlock it for you, they would already have been cooperative enough to get out.
ETA: Much safer for the driver to smash the passenger side window.
For years and years, saying positive things about the US in certain fora was almost guaranteed to get a reply with this link: https://youtube.com/watch?v=wTjMqda19wk?si=IUMfHBNYz1GPtRdn
For better or worse, this is what a lot of people think of when asked to imagine how liberals feel about the country.
ETA: This and Howard Zinn's People's History of the United States
- Prev
- Next

By that rubric, if I yell "I'm going to shoot you!" and point something that is an exact facsimile of a gun at a police officer but isn't, and they shoot me, that is incompetent on their part, even though it would require psychic powers on their behalf to know the difference.
I think the problem here is that you seem to very much want to remove any subjectivity from the rubric, but this is just logically impossible without leading to absurd outcomes like the above. Subjectivity requires us to examine things like, even if there was no gun, did they believe there was? If so, why? Was that belief reasonable even if incorrect? If not, just how unreasonable was it? In this case, it hinges on factors like what the person may have said, how they may have acted, whether or not an accidental discharge took place, etc. These factors would determine whether criminal charges are appropriate, if so which ones, and whether and which workplace disciplinary actions would be appropriate.
More options
Context Copy link