@sarker's banner p

sarker

Where are the Snowdens of yesteryear?

0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 05 16:50:08 UTC

				

User ID: 636

sarker

Where are the Snowdens of yesteryear?

0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 05 16:50:08 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 636

I have literally never heard a Californian complain about the unpleasantness of earthquakes.

Why would they keep buying it if the value of that housing is being diluted by all the new housing? Foreigners buy houses in these markets as an investment. The only reason the sunset is a good investment is because the supply of houses is fixed by the boomer death grip. If you could actually build something there it would cease to be a good investment.

Intellectual humility is not code for "I'm going to maintain my preconceived notions prior." Your take is not to find the data, it's to dismiss the data presented that directly contradicts your implication that Israeli fertility vs Japan is due to women in Israel working more part time.

In fact, your claim was that it's "obvious" that this is the case, which doesn't sound very intellectually humble to me, so it's a little strange that you are turning around and using that cudgel against me when it turns out that it's not so obvious after all.

And it wouldn’t be enough.

What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

Look at the NYC and Jersey area.

We're talking about adding one-third of an NYC worth of housing in a single development to the Bay area, increasing housing stock by 40%.

I simply don't believe you. Bring a model that doesn't rely on eternal population growth which has already reversed in the bay area for years now and show your work.

I don't think so.

Indeed, they should take responsibility, but bear none for how things have gotten to this point and bear no responsibility for their present unhappiness.

labor force participation: Japan’s is 74% it seems, Israel’s is at 59% for women. This 15% difference is enormous

If we're talking about childbearing you have to look at the prime age LFPR.

Israel at 81%: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LRAC25FEILA156S

Japan at 83%: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LRAC25FEJPM156S

Not such an enormous difference after all.

We have to add potentially 22 hours at the end of the month to Japanese overtime work

Any reason to believe this isn't factored into reported hours worked?

I don't hate complexity, I just don't like it when people couch arguments in "obvious" facts and then migrate to other facts when those obvious things turn out to be not so obvious. If it's about the vibes, just make the straightforward vibes argument and be done with it.

Lots of people do this (see Taiwan, Japan). Even in San Francisco there are tall buildings. There's no shortage of demand.

I'm not sure there exists a statistic real enough if it's not in the direction you expect.

there are a million ways to cut red tape besides allowing multiple family building in single family zones", but for some reason these organizations are ONLY focused on ways to increase density.

Really? Here's California yimby's policy page.

https://cayimby.org/resources/policy-framework/chapter-1/

Here's the red tape they want to cut that's not just up zoning.

Create a state-level board of appeals for permitting.

Direct HCD to conduct a review of international building codes.

Direct HCD to create rules and guardrails around nexus studies.

Direct HCD to provide guidance on representative "community input" models.

Direct the Law Revision Commission to study existing housing law and provide recommendations for simplification.

Reform environmental review for housing.

Standardize the post-entitlement process statewide.

In fact it's most of them. And I certainly don't see anything about enforcing urban growth boundaries.

If California Forever alone (lol) was developed to Barcelona's density (note we are not even talking high rises here) it could fit 3.4M people.

No, you can't even build housing in the middle of nowhere without hearing these nimby arguments.

Up zoning is great for property values. The nimby argument is not due to property values but rather "neighborhood character".

We're not talking about checking anything off, we're talking about a number of hours reported.

You are of course welcome to reject reality and substitute your own, but it's a sign of epistemic closure when you don't update at all in the face of evidence.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Forever

https://protectcoyotevalley.org/

In east Alameda countythere's enormous amounts of empty space. Much of the prime real estate in Santa Clara county is warehouses or other industrial areas, and much of the bay area is really shitty SFHes built on shoestring budgets in the sixties.

That's off the top of my head.

You can add a custom css rule to set it to display: none;

Scottish game series

walter_collapse.gif

info-hazard Daughter Question

I'm almost afraid to ask. Is this just the "think about it logically" copypasta?

Shall we bet?

This seems to prove too much. How is it that anyone finds a long term partner in college? And yes, this does happen, I know of several cases.

No, you simply have to allow people to develop their own property.

Didn't we establish that California is losing population? Have a look at housing price growth over the same period.

Who said anything about major?

Sejong

Christ, what a bleak pic on Wikipedia. A six lane arterial, two parking lots, and the world's saddest park. I can understand why existing cities become ugly. Why do people do this when designing new cities?