@zeke5123a's banner p

zeke5123a


				

				

				
1 follower   follows 0 users  
joined 2024 March 06 04:28:27 UTC

				

User ID: 2917

zeke5123a


				
				
				

				
1 follower   follows 0 users   joined 2024 March 06 04:28:27 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 2917

I don’t believe that 95% of women that age are progressive. Let’s say 70% are, 10% are neutral, and 20% are on the right.

Why aren’t you increasing your odds on the 20%

Yes this is what the loud majority (minority?) might say. But again you aren’t trying to attract the majority of women. You are trying to attract a small enough set of women to find hopefully a good match.

Hitler and Lizzardspawn are both humans. Look at the similarities!

Yes if you take a 1,000 miles high view, the two look similar. But…if you have any sort of refined look the differences emerge pretty quickly.

Tell me you have read Aristotle without telling me you haven’t read Aristotle.

Is it? As a guy, don’t you want to differentiate yourself? Better to stand out for 10% of the population compared to be unnoticed by 100%.

I think you’re right in that a lot of women who say that could get past it (and maybe even learn that their worldview has some holes). But filters frequently prevent getting to the “look past it” stage.

It was a pretty funny post.

Notably, you made a bad not too level post by comparing Hitler to Trump (ie make Germany great again). Trump isn’t Hitler even if Trump has an authoritarian streak.

What is the implication?

Is she ugly? (I kid)

One example doesn’t really move the needle compared to larger datasets.

Data from online dating shows Indian men as not very attractive to white women.

It would be very odd that a white woman was obsessively in love with an Indian male in the first place. Add that it’s a high status white woman. Add that she apparently was sexually harassing and racially insulting the guys wife. Just massive press x to doubt.

And frequently, the first wife tolerates the situation while not happy with it provider (1) the husband doesn’t publicly embarrass her with the infidelity and (2) doesn’t divert too many resources to the mistress.

No. Men obviously want T&A. But it ain’t the only thing. I wouldn’t have probably been interested in my wife if she was an uggo but I didn’t marry her just because she looked (and still does) great in a tank top. That is, if people are honest there are non romantic truths about attraction that matters but it doesn’t mean the romantic things don’t matter either.

We can’t even build Disney world anymore. Disney is actually pretty freaking great! There was a lot of detail and attention put into it.

Now? Each addition takes forever and misses some key trait the original parks had.

I do think electoral votes ought to go by district with the overall state popular vote winner getting the bonus 2 votes.

This runs into a very basic question: if a general rule has a disparate impact should you eliminate the general rule.

The historic proposition was that you can have the general rule but allow for reasonable accommodations (eg if you are fired for refusing to work the sabbath, then that isn’t quitting for unemployment purposes but if you claimed every day was the sabbath that would be quitting).

Here, there doesn’t seem to be an easy accommodation.

I think it lags publicly because most people thing the east wing is the left side of the facade of the White House; not some random building on the grounds.

Depends on what you mean by popular.

Race based discrimination was very u popular for a long time in the general population; it was only among the tastemakers that it was popular.

  1. The president frequently attends events.

  2. It would be easier from a security perspective to host these events at a WH ballroom as opposed to random hotels in DC where security is more lax.

  3. It doesn’t matter if Trump personally benefits but the presidency writ large.

Okay but what about say a wheel chair? It is a vehicle. Maybe you have ADA so perhaps that trumps.

What about stroller?

Yeah. Because clearly tumblr was a long standing fence in the middle of nowhere that reformers wanted to tear down without understanding why tumblr cancellations were there in the first place.

Depends on how many nukes are launched

Big Yud is a bit incoherent. If he is right, then he should be calling for firebombing. Either he doesn’t really believe his expressed certainty or he rejects utilitarian thinking.

Arguably, the rat adjacent attacks on Altman qualify.

I think your other examples miss the point. It isn’t about finding a random connection between group A and bad thing B. It is about finding a direct connection, higher than the baseline, and tacit group approval. It was shocking how many people cheered Kirk’s death. It was shocking how many people were upset Trump survived the multiple attempts.