zeke5123a
21d ago
Why mention winning by 3m votes coupled with saying the election was not on the up and up if all you meant was Trump was a Manchurian candidate? There really isn’t anything in there about Manchurian candidate. That’s motivated reason to avoid the obvious truth.
zeke5123a
21d ago
That’s just an unreasonable interpretation and I suspect bad faith.
You don’t mention winning by 3m votes while claiming the election was not on the up and up / saying something isn’t right here simply to mean “Trump is a Manchurian candidate.”
The whole point of mentioning the votes is to to suggest you were actually elected but something “not on the up” happened.
zeke5123a
21d ago
Here is the quote from the article:
“There was a widespread understanding that this election was not on the level. We still don’t know what really happened. There’s just a lot that u think will be revealed. History will discover. But you don’t win by 3 million votes and have all this other shenanigans and stuff going on about come away with an idea like, ‘Who’s, somethings not right here.’ That was a deep sense of unease.”
That’s fucking clear as day election denialism. Care to recant?
zeke5123a
21d ago
Your claim was nonsense. You claim there was no election denialism. Yet Hillary made points about downstream votes making you scratch your head? What do you think that is? What do you think she meant when she said he wasn’t the legitimate president? Of course she is claiming the election was not on the up and up. Just because you have a specific definition doesn’t make your claim reasonable.
Hell Trump admitted that Biden was the lawful president. See he didn’t deny the election.
zeke5123a
21d ago
This is just not true. People like Clinton claimed Trump did not legitimately win. See https://www.yahoo.com/news/hillary-clinton-maintains-2016-election-160716779.html
See also Stacey Abrams.
zeke5123a
22d ago
They are so shackled by their blank slatism and fear of racism. Pro immigration in the year of our lord 2025 is the idea that genes and culture don’t matter.
zeke5123a
22d ago
Seems to me the easy change is to cut social spending to immigrants. State in six months the spigot is turned off but will pay an additional six month lump sum + moving costs if they leave.
zeke5123a
23d ago
Sure. But when videos are 30 seconds long, you could have one ad per ten videos and still end up with a decent ad return.
Also ads shown to customers are not the only important monetization stream.
zeke5123a
23d ago
My prediction is that the second kind of grade inflation causes the first kind of a grade inflation.
zeke5123a
23d ago
Yeah that’s my biggest problem. The field is inherently unserious. Yet many people “tut tut” about someone bringing in a non academic point of view when the entire field is non academic.
zeke5123a
23d ago
Did you read the essay? It wasn’t good but your claim that she spent most of the time talking about non binaries instead of gender roles fails reading comprehension
zeke5123a
23d ago
There was a communal aspect to it that I still miss—especially for comedies.
zeke5123a
23d ago
People don’t stay on TikTok for only 30 seconds. My guess is they watch numerous videos. You could have some short ads.
zeke5123a
24d ago
I think low level bullying is good. It helps enforce some degree of social standards. It helps people learn how to deal with difficult people. It makes people learn that they will survive.
I was bullied when I was a kid. I bullied kids when I was a kid. In both cases, it wasn’t a lot of bully (just general teasing and occasional light physical stuff).
zeke5123a
24d ago
It would by psychology throwing stones. Gender theory is religious belief.
zeke5123a
24d ago
The TA and professor also appear dimwitted. Just three dumb people arguing but one of them is attractive so…
zeke5123a
24d ago
The moat is the network effects. If you want people to see your short form video, it’s on TikTok.
zeke5123a
24d ago
Banks have to agree (generally for some inducement). You can’t just put all of your debt in a legal entity and spin it out thereby eliminating your debt. Banks aren’t stupid. Likewise you can’t strip assets out of the banking group without consent (again banks aren’t stupid).
The other poster is making a value judgement that the banks are making a bad deal. The banks don’t share the pessimism. We will see who is right.
zeke5123a
24d ago
Isn’t it relative? I think you are making the case that an A is not what an A was 30 years ago. I’d agree.
My question for you is if only 10% of students could receive an A, do you think that A would more closely resemble what an A looked like 30 years compared to today or less?
I think your comment says more about the Muslim community than anything.
More options
Context Copy link