@zeke5123a's banner p

zeke5123a


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2024 March 06 04:28:27 UTC

				

User ID: 2917

zeke5123a


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2024 March 06 04:28:27 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 2917

I wonder if you could have a new university that initially paid students to come. There is an SAT cut off plus a requirement to have some AP. Three year intensive with only core classes needed (you should be able to do the requisite credit hours in 3 years if you have sufficient AP and a single summer night class). Internships required. After the first couple of classes succeed in getting hired at strong firms, you flip the switch and start charging 50k a year.

Sure of course. But if all they are doing is adding a mens rea requirement, then there is less chance of randomly being jailed.

You still need an actus reus. If you remove “strict liability” you are just adding a new element government must prove; not changing the predicate to something wishy washy.

But…which pope decided on who the electors are here?

So the scandal is in part that Ms Dong wanted the dong of her attending? I’ll show myself out…

This presumes government services provide benefits. I’m sure most government employees believe they provide a benefit (it’s hard to function believing you offer no value while getting a paycheck) but it’s possible (maybe likely) that many government programs are simply make work.

And if that’s right then DOGE is a massive successive because it proves the civil service is unnecessary and outdated.

That made me laugh.

Sure — it is an establishment chamber of commerce newspaper

So a magazine that is pro immigration broadly (in a chamber of commerce way) interviewed a few people who also benefit from the immigration and this is supposed to tell us about the conditions on the ground in Springfield?

This just seems very premature. If in a three months, tariffs have increased only a little compared to Jan 20th and there are a lot of trade deals, will Scott say “hey I was wrong and the right can course adjust much faster than the left.”

But that’s in part because they want to say the price to the consumer is X. They then say the cost is X plus Y (the sales tax).

Amazon already paid the tariff prior to selling to a customer and indeed didn’t pay tariff on the price charged to the customer (unlike sales tax).

It is more akin to CIT which Amazon doesn’t break out.

I don’t really have a problem with Amazon doing that but at the same time wish they’d do it for other government taxes or inefficiencies.

I am not a family law lawyer, but it seems like the father may not have any rights under LA since the parents weren’t married when the kid was born.

But what if the guy is a great hockey player who unfortunately has the last name satan?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miroslav_%C5%A0atan

Boasberg doesn’t have anything to do with Garcia

It isn’t dispositive but it is evidence

I’m pretty sure the kid was assassinated in a separate drone strike in a cafe.

I don’t think traffic implies forced. Coyotes traffic people across the border because the people want to get across the border.

But doesn’t that cast further doubt on the suspect?

To be clear I was talking about his kid. And it was nothing like with Garcia.

I think you are mistaken—if this guy died there’d be attempted riots. This is getting noise because progs need immigrants in their voting bloc.

I was in college at the time. Regardless, I think practically it was a relatively small story.

I think the point of Jesus’ death is that he was killed by the legal leaders, religious leaders, and the general public. It wasnt one party but the whole.

I don’t think anything you write there is the true reason. First, wrongful death suits are pretty much orthogonal to how the public thinks about these things (ie most people would be more concerned about the government having the ability to summarily execute them as opposed to jailing them). Second, the killing of Alwaki wasn’t years old; it was prominent. If memory serves Rand Paul filibustered over it.

No, I think the true reason is that progressives and their media allies don’t really care about due process; it is used as a weapon. They don’t like Trump deporting illegals so they brought up this case where there is a silly argument over due process (nobody disputes the core underlying fact that he ought not be in the US) and are trying to use it to paint with a wide brush.

So yeah I dont think progressives in toto are being honest here though that doesn’t mean the person I’m responding to is being dishonest.

Why? This fucker is substantively guilty and the only reason this is an issue is a BS asylum claim.

So now due process requires us to wait to deport people? How long?