I know the most hardcore anti-transers will say the only thing that matters is your birth sex.
Are you sure that is the position of the most hardcore? Might be the plurality position.
Yeah there is an original mover problem to SCOTUS’ logic.
Zoning law is kind of a shitty version of common law nuisance. You won’t find defending zoning qua zoning. But it is an out growth of common law nuisance and is getting at something inherently different than rent control (ie what do you when rights are incompatible). Thus comparing the two is a category error.
FWIW, I would get rid of zoning and permit restrictive deeds including racial.
Depends on what you mean by property rights. You bring up nuisance but that really involves a situation of conflicting property rights. A wants to use its property for X which conflicts with how B wants to use its property. How do you solve that? Well the law of nuisance. Or if you like law and Econ read The Problem of Social Costs by Coase.
That is fundamentally a different kind of regulation compared to rent control. In the first, there is a conflict in property rights. In the second, there is no conflict.
The court in Penn Central basically asked about investment backed expectations. The basic idea is if you bought property knowing the regulation is likely presumably the purchase price reflected that ambiguity so providing compensation is giving a windfall to the regulated entity.
Now whether this is reasonable is a different matter but that’s the theory.
They did somewhat in Lucas v South Carolina Coastal Commission
That’s not entirely true. There can be regulatory takings where your use of the property is wholly frustrated. See Lucas v South Carolina Coastal Commission
You said: Sailer plays to his audience, which is very much inclined to frame everything as racialist spoils systems. He’s going to ascribe that to the Democrats no matter what they say.
The last sentence implies that the democrats don’t do racial spoils systems.
But they do. What do you think supporting affirmative action is? Or saying you will pick a certain color for scotus or VP? Why defend minority majority districts? There use euphemisms but at its core it is racial spoils
Write in campaign is hard. You need low knowledge voters to put you over the top and a write in campaign requires the opposite of low knowledge voters
Are you telling me the Dems don’t advertise racial spoils?
I just don’t buy the argument that “it is something that can totally happen” yet no one knows anyone else that got a Nazi tattoo.
Really? You think Nazi tattoos are relatable? I don’t know anyone who has a Nazi tattoo.
The flip side is that Tesla gets a lot more data than Waymo.
I think Trump would have the same reaction if it was darts. It isn’t soccer itself but America winning.
I don’t think the left views cops as bastards because police mistreat the left. Instead, it is hatred of hierarchies. Thus, ACAB because cops are part of the hierarchy.
In contrast, the right can view cops as an instrument.
To me, it reads as emotionally stable. You want a good life for your daughter and part of that is her marrying a good man. In return, you get grandkids.
Oh no doubt. I’m just pointing out his hypocrisy.
Neither did I. I responded to the post with a claim (supported by evidence) that was germane to the post.
There have been six WBC champions—the U.S. has won once.
I’m not sure the U.S. would really be the favorite to win baseball. Both DR and Japan have great programs with a lot of talent.
You also have Venezuela, Korea, and other LATAM teams of varying quality.
Is that less competitive compared to say basketball?
I’m not sure it’s a reasonable argument now. If courts shut down probes and other parties couldn’t compel info, why would we expect data six years later to shed light?
One area where an investigation went forward (ie Georgia) significantly increases the likelihood that something fishy happened in Georgia.
Explain how “I hate western people” isn’t waging the cultural war if my claim that third worlders commit crime at higher rates / police fear to arrest them is waging the culture war?
Most states have a Romeo and Juliet exception to the age of consent being 18 whereby if the difference in the age of the lovers is a small number the age of consent doesn’t matter. This suggests the Overton window is a bit nuanced.
That is, we don’t want to send high school boyfriends to jail for having sex with their slightly younger high school girlfriends even if ideally we don’t want them having sex.
- Prev
- Next

Nah — the point is zoning is top down with one body deciding everything. Restrictive deeds would be more de centralized so you end up with a lot more actual diversity in land use while maintaining the ability to minimize conflicts.
More options
Context Copy link