@Grant_us_eyes's banner p

Grant_us_eyes


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 12 12:05:58 UTC

				

User ID: 1156

Grant_us_eyes


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 12 12:05:58 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 1156

As much as I dislike Substack, I'll give fair where fair is due - that was a fairly entertaining and educational read. Thank you for that.

I mean, is this a peptide? Do you have a name?

TLDR: A number of women are now going online and complaining that the majority of men are unattractive/ugly('chopped men'). The pushback from some of the more spicy internet content creators is that the women complaining about this are all mid, and have no space to talk.

Sadly, this isn't a new opinion. I've seen a number of threads in popular reddit forums(I know, I know) that have voiced similar opinions, that when going out in public, they never see men that they find attractive.

Assuming this is all done in good faith, it's a demonstration of just how women and men are different. I can go out in public and I'm going to see plenty of women I find cute, attractive, appealing, classy, and whatnot. That women don't have a similar mindset is, well, depressing, more than anything.

My current girlfriend is a dancer in a major ballet company. I hang out with her and her ballet friends. They're top 1% in terms of looks and talent. They all have nice, normal boyfriends. One of the bfs is a poor PhD student. One is a random software engineer at some company. Just normal guys.

My dude.

These are not normal people.

Alot of the motte falls into the far end of the bell curve when it comes to employment, money, and success. Of course they're going to look around like John Travolta and wonder aloud 'Where's the problem?' They all have factors in place that mitigate alot of what the median have to deal with.

I swear, I feel half the posts that seem to come up when this topic arises could simply be replied with the phrase 'OK, Boomer' and be done with it...

Part of the controversy is that Immigration can benefit several groups - such as Big Business(who now has access to cheaper labor), immigrants, who are now getting paid far in excess of what they would have received in thier home country - but it hurts American workers, who are, to quote the person whom wrote the article;

What does it all add up to? The fiscal burden offsets the gain from the $50 billion immigration surplus, so it's not too farfetched to conclude that immigration has barely affected the total wealth of natives at all. Instead, it has changed how the pie is split, with the losers—the workers who compete with immigrants, many of those being low-skilled Americans—sending a roughly $500 billion check annually to the winners. Those winners are primarily their employers. And the immigrants themselves come out ahead, too. Put bluntly, immigration turns out to be just another income redistribution program.

This is not a new article. This was written back in 2016, in response to a debate between Trump and Hillary. This has been going on for a very long time, and that we're still debating that immigration comes as an overall positive(for Shareholder-Americans, maybe) astounds me and shows how the narrative is controlled overall.

It doesn't need to be better to have a devastating effect, it just needs to be 'good enough'.

Why not? They've done it before. They explicitly went out of their way to hide the Nashville Shooter's manifesto, who was a self-claimed FtM tranny that shot up a Christian school, if you've forgotten.

This is just a philosophical argument that allows people to come to the recognition that, despite having done bad things in the past, they do not have to do bad things in the future.

But they have to stop wanting to do bad things.

I'm not saying appealing to the idea of Jesus's love as all-forgiving is wrong, mind you. I'm just pointing out it's not a magical panacea where you mumble words and all of a sudden everything is fixed.

To quote scripture, 'Go forth, and sin no more.'

You equate 'cost' as if it's something to be paid to God. No. It's something you pay to yourself.

If you prefer a secular version, you can't force someone into therapy when they don't want to heal.

Whenever I see this argument, I just helplessly gesture in the general direction of Joshua Graham from Fallout: New Vegas, how much the character is beloved in the community despite being extremely religious, before throwing my hands in the air and giving up, knowing I'll never be able to communicate the entire point without a multi-paragraph effort post.

To try and summarize the matter, actual redemption always comes with a cost. If you're not willing to pay the cost, you're not actually redeemed. You're just doing such to excuse your own guilt. Aella seems to just want things delivered to her on a platter, and is complaining her decisions have lead her to this point without any reflection.

You can't force redemption on someone who doesn't want to pay the price.

Given the number of women I've seen intrude into forums on reddit when men get asked about if body count matters and instantly accuse them of being 'insecure' or proclaiming that it does not, no matter how many men say otherwise... maybe?

It's sad that this appears to be common behavior. As I've seen all of which you've mentioned, multiple times, and every time I'm astounded by it.

People try to claim that this experience was just 'one time'. If only.

There's a deep sort of intimacy certain people get from text chatting that can't be afforded from talking over the phone or face-to-face. It's like a flase telepathy, where you can strip off pretense and persona and show the 'real you' to others. For a moment, however long or brief, you can fool yourself into thinking you're someone else, the real you, unburdened by the cruel tyranny of reality.

Of course, text chatting and correspondence is no longer very popular except in niche circumstance, and yet, here we are, with Chat-GPT and character AIs to fill the void...

Or, atleast, that's my supposition on the matter.

Chalky, grey-ish pastels are a neutral 'chameleon' color that reflects and attenuate to whatever you put up against it. This allows for ease of decoration when it comes to styling a room without having to worry about extreme color scheme clashes - most people focus on these colors to allow for re-sell value in their houses.

Fun aside, when my parents had to re-paint their entire house for reasons, I was the one pushing my mother for more vibrant, intense colors as opposed to said chalky, grey pastels. She had developed a bad habit of constantly repainting rooms in a succession of ever-worsening colors.

Except for one room, which she never touched - the kitchen, which was done up in a warm, rich, pumpkin-like orange.

After a long spate of harassment(and more color samples than I will confess to - Lowes should have been giving me a commission, geeze), I finally convinced her to go with the richer, warmer colors, and she no longer repaints rooms.

I'm reminded of Demolition Ranch.

For those not aware of the name, Demolition Ranch is a guntuber who's been doing gun-tubing for quite a while, and recently stopped to focus on his family.

People have commented on how his later content diverged quite a bit from his early stuff, with sensationalist activities and click-baity titles and zany video cards.

When questioned about that, he basically replied that what was getting the most view count, hence the pivot. In other words, that's what getting him the money.

The attention and engagement economy, it seems, says alot about what the mass of humanity demands.

I was about to say that I've never used AI, but then I realized that would be a lie - I've used AI before to put together a long string of fluffy bullshit for work in order to save myself the aggravation of putting together said fluffy bullshit.

...and I will likely use it again this week to, yet again, put together a few paragraphs of fluffy bullshit to appease the MBA types in my office.

The wonders of Hoe_math. The gift that keeps on giving.

...you just split suicides/suicides attempts into gendered groups, not political. Men tend to be more successful, women tend to attempt it more.

What I had one person point out that's always stuck with me, however, is that an 'attempted suicide' moment for a man is going to be different for a woman. 'Attempted suicide' in that case is going to involve a man taking out a loaded gun, staring at it for an hour, and then quietly putting it away.

The crux of the argument being, 'attempts' in this situation are going to be manifest differently and trying to measure them scientifically is going to be messy and lossy as the result.

Having friends - even close ones - is a different experience from having a girlfriend/fiancé/wife you come home to every evening.

There's also the other side of this equation, when some friends get married(and have children) and the rest don't. Even worse if they move away. You're still friends, you still talk alot, but circumstances change when you can only see each other face to face once or twice a year.

Apartments are literally built different in America compared to Europe.

All the urban issues most cities have come down to onerous requirements. You want European urban centers? Then start using European regulations.

I was curious if there was something I'm missing, hence my question.

Granted, we're in completely different locales, so pricing is likely rather different; for me, injections of Semaglutide come at around 200$ a month(tax included).

And I won't even go into the recent scam prices they're now charging for Ozempic.

Supposedly, you can get Semaglutide even cheaper than my pricing from the same outlets pharmacies get it, as long as you're not afraid of doing a little mixing on your lonesome. I may go that route, once my prescription runs out.

Exercise.

That's it.

Both I and my brother are on semaglutide, and we're both consistently working out, and I've not noticed any loss in muscle mass.

If anything, I now have much more energy, allowing myself to push harder and faster, but that's just with me.

Just out of curiosity, is there any reason you choose oral over injection?

It's the classic 'Your need several years experience to get an entry-level job' problem.

No wonder people compare dating nowadays to job-hunting.