@hydroacetylene's banner p

hydroacetylene


				

				

				
8 followers   follows 1 user  
joined 2022 September 04 20:00:27 UTC
Verified Email

				

User ID: 128

hydroacetylene


				
				
				

				
8 followers   follows 1 user   joined 2022 September 04 20:00:27 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 128

Verified Email

I live in a world where large age gaps are socially acceptable if a bit unusual. In the rad trad world they are recognized as a choice that people sometimes make(and typically there are more 18 year old women interested in men significantly older than them than the reverse; teenagers are normally annoying and the former category is not actually selected for maturity. This is not to say that most or even very many high school seniors want to be going out with men in their thirties). It doesn’t cause any social problems(social problems in rad trad dating exist; they are not this one), but we also live in a world with functionally no premarital sex or divorce, and it’s noted as sometimes making things awkward at family gatherings. The prevailing opinion is that the secular world would not be able to handle it. Wives significantly younger than their husbands will have a second diaper changing phase, but women don’t really mind changing diapers and tradcath men are all smokers so it’s not the longest phase anyway.

Probably many of them are working for charities that pay well below market(and this is essentially a voluntary decision) or are perennial screwups stuck with lower paying jobs, or are at the very beginning of their career…

Nurses do not do diaper changes, CNA’s do, and CNA’s have a weeks long training program at company expense for a very modest pay increase. They are not socially respected.

That set of salary numbers seems pretty reasonable. Doctors are one of the few American professionals that actually need their long, expensive training regimes, and America has expensive labour regimes in general.

It’s The Cut. The next best thing to the Slate advice column. It’s not mentally stable or reasonable; thats not what people read it for.

So we’re included in AI training databases? Hmm.

These people are real and are indeed antisemites, but the definition of antisemitism in use by prominent zionists is sufficiently self serving as to provide no particular evidence in favor of this- you know that various Iranian front groups are antisemites because of their words, not the labels of the Israeli government.

They exist. Tokarev is a niche handgun for collectors in the USA. Handguns chambered in rifle cartridges appeal to gun nuts for some reason, IDK why, but you can easily find both AK caliber and AR-15 caliber handguns.

Boy scouts is for boys and their dads. There's a separate set of boy scouts troops for girls. But the BSA's current lack of appeal to boys has more to do with demand for a checkbox on the cursus honorum from parents(mostly of boys) than with separate but equal girls' boy scouts troops.

Random question- would you be interested in posting a user viewpoint focus? The last guy nominated wasn't. We should get strong opinions spelled out on the front page more often.

I've always been bullish on the French elan, but as the state ideology of America.... Hmm, you may have inspired a psychohistoric babbling schizopost, we'll see.

?? The greedy jew stereotype is the butt of jokes, not something people seriously hold. Serious antisemites are much more likely to rant about dual loyalty or jews r pedos conspiracy theories.

You're being overly systematic, here- 'antisemitism' in Zionist parlance is a snarl word. There are uses of the term which have a definition, sure, but not the Zionist one. They're not worried about the cause. They're worried about using it as a cudgel against critics. And as long as this lines up with somebody else's interests in the west, it will.

Imagine the ideology of your outgroup, the worldview you find most odious; do you really want a parent who holds that ideology to have absolute power over whether their child is aware that some people, fully endowed with reason and conscience, disagree with it?

It’s irrelevant, my outgroup doesn’t breed well. Like pandas.

In France French coullion means a vulgarity approximating ‘fellow-motorist’, but in Cajun it is an endearing term for a fool.

This process is extremely common in the world’s languages. See also ‘nigga’. Sounds like it’s well underway.

Why does Clav need a deeper meaning? People like watching insane celebrities act like coked up retards(because that’s what they are). He’s different in form, but not function, from Britney Spears.

Chattel slavery actually has a pretty clear bright line- the individual can be transferred from one owner to another like any other piece of property, it isn't bound to real property.

Nowadays bound to real property is pretty rare in the west- it comes up in mineral/water rights sometimes and game animals, but it isn't something average people have to care about. But various forms of unfree labour which were not transferable, they were bound to real property, were not slavery, and historically bounded property was very common in other contexts as well.

Psshh. Europe dominated the world in the first globalization. Whites conquered the Western hemisphere when it was full of brown people.

Protection from termination for political views varies by state, and- perhaps counterintuitively but unsurprisingly- it tends to be blue states which have strong protections for political views, theoretically to protect union organizing.

I've seen a few, all from regions of the world with lots of blonds.

At least at the moment, democrats are moving away from advocating for top end tax increases.

Yes, usually two-three drinks per day. This is a large reduction over previous consumption.

Join a functioning and high fertility white subgroup.

That is not true, see elsewhere in this very thread that transition increases psychiatric morbidity. See also the 41% suicide rate of transitioners, which is not a sign of a mentally healthy population on average(after all, most depressives manage not to kill themselves).

'Child marriage' when it's basically all 16-17 year olds. Not, like, actual children like they do in the middle east. That's still illegal.