This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I don't think you can define one single reactionary right position on this topic, even leaving out the large fraction of trolls who don't take the political project seriously. There are IQ supremacists, eugenicists, tradcath integralists, etc. who don't care what race Americans are or sometimes even if there is such a thing as America, and focusing just on de facto or professed white nationalists there are increasingly vehement disagreements over whether someone counts as a true American as we go down the line from descendants of British colonists to descendants of German and Irish immigrants to Ellis Islanders to light-skinned Latin Americans and so on. The position that we need some sort of 19th century European-style nationalist project to shore up or restore an American identity is the closest to what you've outlined and might be the logical endpoint of many reactionary trains of thought, but I don't know how many have actually gotten there yet.
I also find it interesting that your hypothetical reactionary considers whites, blacks, and natives collectively to be Americans, leaving out the Asians and Hispanics who are now over a quarter of the population, because I have long been expecting some sort of racial/political realignment along those lines. It seems as though a high rate of intermarriage and low rate of civic engagement by the new arrivals may prevent this from happening however, which means that we might have to hear the same tired arguments about slavery and segregation between the white (now with added flavor) and black populations repeated ad nauseum until the end of time, or at least of America.
I live in Texas, which is majority Hispanic now and also majority white, with large black and Asian populations.
The idea that Asians and Hispanics are going to team up against legacy Americans is farcical. Hispanics mostly prefer their white bosses and coworkers to other minority groups(sometimes including different kinds of Hispanics), and whites prefer Hispanics to blacks or underclass whites. The racial politics of the future is either whites vs everyone else or whites and Hispanics vs blacks(or possibly some combination thereof where Mexicans but not Guatemalans are honorary whites).
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link