This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
On the one hand, I keep hearing how bureaucratically difficult it is, by the rules of the DNC, to actually replace Biden. Bordering on impossible. And even if they did, supposedly all the money they've raised is for the Biden/Harris ticket. FEC rules state that it can't just be handed over to a different presumptive nominee except for Harris, which people seem to be trying to avoid. There is also the reporting that Biden has closed his circle extremely tight, essentially only listening to advice from his wife and his son. Nobody else is even allowed near him unless they say what Jill or Hunter want them to say, and both of them seem addicted to power and the wealth and protection it provides. I've seen other reporting indicating that Biden will try to rubberstamp his nomination ASAP to burn the boats. There is no longer any retreat, ride or die. And that completely ignores the fact that there was no real DNC primary. There were no debates, a lot of states didn't even bother with the formality of a vote. Nobody else has any sort of popular support or mandate, they'd be starting from scratch. Well, I should amend that statement, nobody the DNC wants has any sort of mandate. I'm sure people would love RFK Jr as the nominee.
Every now and again, Saagar Enjeti will comment that Trump appears to be truly blessed by God. Going into the debate, all I heard was that Trump's claim that he will debate any time, any where, any rules gave away too much. That he had completely gimped himself having CNN moderate the debate, mute his mic, take him away from an audience he could do crowd work against, etc. There were conspiracy theories about the fact that other press were not allowed in the room to corroborate any mute-mic comments the candidates made, allowing CNN to spin with impunity as the only source present. Analyst were saying the debate was too early to have any impact on the election, and that historically it's difficult to say if debates have any influence at all.
Barely 10 minutes into the debate, and it's like reality collapsed. Something truly historic and unprecedented occurred.
Yeah, that debate moment is going in the history books as one of the biggest ever.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link