This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
You think this is the chief value? Or is this just your own hangup? I almost married a black chick, even though I believe in hbd. I can see a lot of cultural and political effects that are far more important than snark snark autism snark.
I was never in that situation exactly, but I would have no objection to marrying a black girl as long as she was smart (and, y'know, hot etc.) ... but I worry about how that conversation would go if you were ever called upon to explain your beliefs to her. Did your almost-wife know about your HBD position - or indeed, was she already HBD-pilled?
She did know my beliefs, I developed them halfway through our relationship. Well, I had suspicions at the start, and found confirmation partway through.
It was dicey at first, but she was open to it. It helped that she knew me by then, and that it wasn't a "my pure hu-white blood" thing.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
I don't see anything in his argument that implies that the last fifty years haven't been a total failure, or that another fifty years won't continue to be a failure.
I generally think it's pretty likely that HBD is true, but it's not useful, and it won't ever be useful. The core problem is that Blacks are here, and they aren't going anywhere, and there are enough of them that any plan they don't accept is a non-starter. Most of the plans springing from HBD involve writing off Blacks in some way, but that was never going to work, and certainly isn't going to now. You need something that gives meaningful resolution to their considerable problems, or you're dead in the water. Whether you're right on the facts doesn't actually matter if you can't do anything useful with the information, and working the problem from things we actually have reason to believe are fixable is more likely to be productive than working it from the side we're pretty sure can't be budged.
Stable families do a lot better in most ways than single moms and absent dads. Blacks had better family stability prior to the social revolutions of the 60s, so we have reason to believe that it's at least possible to do better than they're doing now. Black crime rate has decreased from its' peak in the 90s, and it's increased massively since 2020, so we know that policy actually has an impact there as well. It's possible that you can't actually close the gap, but if you get the raw numbers low enough that might not actually matter.
Any of this is vastly more productive that sitting on your thumb, waiting for the American public to embrace ideas it's been rigorously inoculated against for the last three generations running.
No such thing exists if you accept that HBD is false. Because that keeps leading back to racism, racism, racism and "solutions" based on the problem being racist white people are all counterproductive. We are unlikely to get any solution in any case, but accepting falsehoods does not help.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link