site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of October 10, 2022

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

23
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I have a weird political orientation. I’m a semi-fascists neoliberal.

Empire requires neoliberalism. The Roman’s did their form of neoliberalism. They viewed themselves as better but protected a broad geography that encouraged trade. And you need that for empire. I don’t want to give up American hegemony which I think is a force of good.

But that doesn’t mean I’m anti-nationalist. I like Meloni in Italy. I believe in encouraging a strong America which is anti-woke. I think some of Melonis ideas like aid to families makes sense and in America we had child tax credit which Romney supported. Nationalist tend to be somewhat socialist in support of the family.

On the media it’s all propaganda now. Hunter Bidens laptop suppression illustrates that. Joe has still avoided having to answer questions on who the “big man” was.

On corporations it’s obviously they’ve been woke captured. Some of that is fear of lawsuits. Etf hasn’t helped because the left can capture the etf providers and pressure corporations even if the majority ownership stake isn’t woke, the right is correct in trying to find solutions to fight back.

Empire requires neoliberalism. The Roman’s did their form of neoliberalism. They viewed themselves as better but protected a broad geography that encouraged trade. And you need that for empire. I don’t want to give up American hegemony which I think is a force of good.

Neoliberalism and nationalism are opposing forces. Neoliberalism strengthens the private sector and weakens state power. It strengthens the lobby groups that demand migration, as much migration as possible. Cheap labour and skilled labour, it wants people moving to where they're most economically efficient. It transfers wealth from less efficient parts of the nation to more efficient parts of the global economy. You had a shipbuilding industry in Glasgow? Now it's in Tianjin.

For example, take the US and EU trying to get Estonia to embrace multiculturalism. They are neoliberal entities, through and through. https://archive.ph/ZnU7w

  • Estonian authorities ought to add the teaching of the benefits of diversity and living in a multicultural society in school programs.
  • Estonian authorities need to provide support for the Press Council of Estonia and the Estonian Newspaper Association for training journalists on issues related to racism and racial discrimination.

Empire requires neoliberalism.

Quite the opposite: many empires had not just limited trade between their possessions and outside nations, colonial ones even protected their own local industry from the colonies.

Empire requires exploitation of resources. If by neoliberalism you mean the limits on government intervention in the market and barriers to trade...no.