This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
And by importing, you mean advocating fewer restrictions. Isn't it just possible that people support immigration because they think it's good for a range of economic or moral reasons, not for some nefarious reasons regarding the partisanship of immigrants. I do, at least.
This is just silly. Not only does media coverage mostly just respond to demand - at the end of the day even MSNBC just want viewers, that's what they exist for - cable news is not the entirety of media in America. Local news and most print media (with a few notable exceptions), especially tabloids, don't 'blare of left-propaganda' at all.
Sure, that's why famously liberal Kentucky, Montana, West Virginia, Indiana, Arkansas, Alaska and Missouri also expanded mail voting during Covid.
Probably not the place for this discussion but consider that 'uniparty agreed goals' may exist because of genuine overlap in the preferences of both sections of the electorate, not some conspiracy.
Again, probably for another time, but I'd just ask on what specific issues wholly within the President's power Trump was stymied on.
I can't speak for OP, but this is only kinda true. Yes, the nice white Unitarian types and Matt Yglesias do advocate for fewer restrictions, and feel bad when they see ICE hustling some poor dude in a hoodie onto a deportation flight because they figure the guy just wanted to make more money than he could in [$othercountry].
However, there are also well-organized NGOs, as well as less-formal ideological networks that exist explicitly to facilitate migration up and down Latin America, with the terminus being in the United States.
Most frustratingly, withdrawing from Afghanistan and otherwise fighting the foreign policy blob.
That article just makes is seem as though Trump was uniquely incompetent at getting things done. Most of those frustrating him were his appointees, he could have just sacked them. I mean, Biden got it done.
There's a reason populist movements are habitually plagued by administrative mismanagement and procedural incompetent. When you decide that the experts are all frauds, you end up implicitly excluding competent people and making yourself vulnerable to grifters and charlatans.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
"A person" can do that kind of supporting, perhaps. But when 75% of people named José vote Democrat, then no, I absolutely do not believe that the opportunity to import a reliable electoral bloc is absent from the minds of the Democrat politicians advocating for low immigration restrictions.
I suppose I can't fault you for countering my Just So assertion with your own Just So assertion, but let's not pretend that yours is any better supported than mine. "MSNBC exists to serve viewer's demand" is one possibility. "MSNBC exists to spread it's owners propaganda to the masses" is another, and I feel like it's a better fit to the evidence of it's content.
One could just as easily turn this round the other way and say that Republicans don't want immigration because they lean Democratic significantly. Seems pointless to get caught up in this hyper-partisan reading of policy, why not just debate the actual merits?
'Media companies exist to make money' seems like a fairly simple assumption to make in the absence of evidence suggesting otherwise; and I'm not a partisan about this, I would say the same about Fox or Newsmax or whatever.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link