Transnational Thursday is a thread for people to discuss international news, foreign policy or international relations history. Feel free as well to drop in with coverage of countries you’re interested in, talk about ongoing dynamics like the wars in Israel or Ukraine, or even just whatever you’re reading.
- 23
- 2
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I'm not sure if we've talked about this lately, but do we have any thoughts on what should be done with the Russia-Ukraine war at this point? Seems like as good a time as any to consider grand strategy, with Trump soon to take office in the US.
It's a little surprising that it's still going. It seems pretty clear to me at this point that Russia / Putin has no intention of stopping anytime soon. The sanctions regime that has been put in place seems to have caused them to return to self-sufficiency as much as it has hurt them. I'm doubtful that further attempts to sanction them harder will have any greater effect. The Ukrainians seem to have had impressive determination, especially during the first few months, but they don't seem to have the practical ability to eject the Russian troops, even with extremely generous donations of Western arms. I'm doubtful that's possible at all without large-scale Western intervention. There's also the possibility of allowing them to make more deep strikes into Russia with longer-ranged weapons, but I'm doubtful that anything along those lines can hit hard enough to either seriously disrupt their logistics or their will to fight, at least not without, or maybe even with, so many high-end western arms that it's basically obvious it's the US striking them directly, with all of the potential consequences that could entail.
From the perspective of an American, it's felt for a while like maybe it's time to wind down this conflict, or at least our involvement in it, as far as providing arms and assistance. Are we really accomplishing anything but getting more Ukrainians killed to little effect? And okay yeah, Russia is not our friend, but it's probably only to the United States' benefit to push them so far.
Does anyone have any different opinions? Does anyone see any realistic potential of forcing Russia back without a large-scale escalation that I'm doubtful Americans will accept? The European powers may be more determined to push Russia back, but do they have much practical ability without the US?
The best course of action is poisoning Putin at the peace talks and then forging a totally not anti-Chinese defensive pact with both countries.
Ukraine can probably be pressured into formally ceding five provinces and outlawing any form of non-condemnation of its Nazi-associated organizations.
Russia can be pressured into adopting NATO military standards in exchange for sanctions relief. This will ensure it's not ready for a military adventure even if it elects a revanchist a few years down the line.
I'm not a particular fan of Putin, but this would actually be one of the worst options, unless you have some alliance with a group of russian oligarchs ready to take over, in which case you're better of helping them do it another way. Putin is a dick, but he is mostly reasonable, he could easily be replaced by some worse, or Russia could devolve into chaos. You do not want one of the countries with the largest nuclear arsenal to devolve into chaos.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link