This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Wait, what? The effort to overturn RvW was conducted very much in public over five decades! I cannot imagine how anyone missed this!
Yeah, which is what made watching the gaslighting so upsetting, especially when all the anti-abortion guys on the motte took a victory lap after it happened. I don't have logs for it, but I'm sure some of the pro-abortion regulars do.
In fairness some of them were saying things like "holy fuck, Kavanaugh actually found his balls," indicating that they were legitimately surprised rather than going "lol libs, we fooled you all along." So it's not the most awful variant of that behavior, but there was never a moment where people went "ok, yeah, in retrospect all that panic about Roe was justified, my bad"
I am completely confused about the foundation of your claim of gaslighting. Who ever made the claim that "nobody wants to overturn Roe vs. Wade you hysterical pansies," and to the extent that anyone ever made that claim, why would anyone take that person seriously?
There was a national movement, involving millions of people, over five decades, all with the explicit purpose of overturning RvW. This was not a secret.
Sorry, I didn't keep logs during the Kav and Barrett hearings (not sure I even had an account during the first one), but hopefully one of the pro abortion posters can back me up on this one. IIRC lot of people were accusing the Handmaid's Tail cosplayers of being performatively hysterical about the possibility of Roe being overturned because of the usual "republican judges are cucks, they'd never go through with it" argument.
Edit, here's two NR articles that piss me off in a similar way
It has that same smug, sneering "what are you gonna do about it?" conformity enforcing attitude as other "it's not happening but you'll deserve it when it does" stuff, and I find it really upsetting.
I don't believe you understood the critique being made. Those protesters were not merely making the claim "oh no, RvW will be overturned." They were claiming that the removal of RvW would lead to something in the vague ballpark of a Handmaid's Tale dystopia. This is, at a bare minimum, a much stronger claim.
On the Republican side, a sentiment like "republican judges are cucks, they'd never go through with it" was not insincerity, it was fatalism, based on the long history of Republican-nominated Justices who refused to overturn RvW. This was a plank in the Republican platform, a campaign promise made at every opportunity, the basis of an endless number of fundraising pleas, and for nothing until Dobbs.
Edit to add: I'm not a fan of McCarthy's style there either. But I'll give him half a point for stating straight up that he wanted Barrett to be the vote necessary, but just didn't think she would.
Yeah, agreed, it's not a perfect example, and it's hard to find many from the right because they lack the aggressive and omnipresent conformity enforcement systems that the left has. I hope someone can come through with some of the motte quotes I was thinking of, which were really dismissive to anyone who thought the Roeverturn was going to happen right up until the leak, when they switched to doing touchdown dances lol. I swear to God someone here was complaining about it just last week.
"Russia will never invade Ukraine, that's crazy, you're crazy" is another one that happened on the motte, but I didn't want to bring it up because more people are still mad about it, and it didn't break down along typical partisan lines.
One rightwing example is people saying they are just stating facts about race and iq that they don't want to oppress anyone and then they post slurs and holocaust denial and blatant racism
Hey now, if that's an accusation I would never, ever even consider doing the former of those.
Was actually considering adding the impossible trinity of "the Holocaust is fake, Hitler did nothing wrong, but also they had it coming and we'd do it again", but the post was getting pretty long already.
That one's so irritating it makes me do a magical girl transformation into Simon Wiesenthal whenever it comes up. Just pick two of the three and stop bullshitting people, damn it.
It wasn't an accusation just an example of that type of dishonesty from right wing people.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link