This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
And yet they did it in the dark ages of 2005 for brokeback mountain that earned 12 times it's meager budget of 15 milllion. The movie just sucks.
"Brokeback Mountain" was different. To be blunt, it wasn't gay, it was slash. Written by a well-regarded female literary author, directed by Ang Lee who did "Sense and Sensibility" and "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon" and so knows how to do romance and angst and action and historical/genre drama all in one, and the script co-written by Larry McMurty who had proven ability of writing Western themed stories that contained elements that appealed to women as well as men (the Lonesome Dove series is a family saga, a genre that appeals to women) and starring two straight guys who were heart throbs in a tragic love story that is chock-full of angst and ends tragically - of course it did amazingly. This was the kind of Western that women wanted to go see, and would drag their husbands/boyfriends along with them, or if the men didn't want to go, it could be a girls' night out.
"Bros" is a completely different kettle of fish.
More options
Context Copy link
People like jake gyllenhal and heath ledger. Not so much the annoying voiced sommelier from Parks and Rec.
More options
Context Copy link
This is how I see it as well. It actually reminds me of the movie American Ultra, back in 2015. When it flopped at the box office, the writer (Max Landis) was vocal in grumbling on social media that "people say they want to see an original movie, but this shows people won't actually bother to see an original movie". Except... I saw that movie, as it turns out. It sucked badly. Landis simply didn't want to admit that (in fairness, I wouldn't either), so he chose to place the blame on those pesky audiences.
This strikes me as much the same thing, except conveniently for Eichner his flop of a movie happens to be about gay romance. So he doesn't just get to blame the audience for his movie sucking - he gets to blame the bigoted audience. But as you say, people loved Brokeback Mountain. Turns out that you can't just make a piece of media that panders to the norms of $currentYear, you also have to actually make it good or only the hardcore adherents of ideology are going to be interested in it.
It's an all-purpose, all-weather, can offroad as well as on, excuse. Same with the Rings of Power showrunners: "the reason people criticise our amazing show is not because we can't write to save our lives, it's because they're fascists".
Well, hand me my brown shirt and let me goose-step around the kitchen, so!
Yeah, same with the Wheel of Time show. And really a lot of things now that I think about it: Star Trek, Star Wars, Ghostbusters, basically anything where fans criticized a new iteration of a much-loved franchise. It's always "well those people are bigots" whenever the criticism occurs.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link