site banner
naraburns  nihil supernum  3yr ago (text post)   33770 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of October 31, 2022

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

24
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

See, the thing I've been seeing about the blue checkmark is a lot of poorly-disguised sneering about "all it means is that the person's identity is verified (you clods who claim it's people with outsized influence being quoted as Gospel on progressive issues)".

That's all it is, and so it doesn't mean they get special treatment or quoted as authorities or anything. Just a means of verifying identity.

So that makes all the crying over "why should we have to pay for this?" sound hypocritical to me. Why do you want or need a blue checkmark? "So I know Professor Doctor Eat The Horse Paste is a trusted and reputable authority, instead of an unverified Doctor Professor Eat The Horse Paste!"

No, it's because you want to retweet and quote "ackshully The Science Says, you bigots, and here's a Real Scientist saying that there is no biological basis for sex".

If you want archaeologists and anthropologists to label skeletons as "who knows what this body was in life, they could have been a Brave and Stunning Valid Real Woman?", because forensic anthropology does not exist and there is no way to differentiate between a male or female skeleton so this six thousand year old set of dead bones could be trans you bigots, then you can damn well pay for the privilege of getting to finger-wag and lecture on social media as An Expert.

I get to shoot my mouth off on here for free, and nobody has to pay a straw's worth of attention to me. If you want to point to your blue check mark as "This is why you should take me seriously", then you can stump up for the licence to demand attention and credulity.

The problem here is that Twitter has rescinded the bluecheck as a form of punishment against users they disapprove of and seemingly denied it to many others for similar reasons.

I actually found the link interesting. Skeleton from the Corded Ware Bronze Age culture that was biologically male but buried in female tradition. (Head facing west, surrounded by jugs instead of weapons.)

They also point out rightly in the article that burial practices were incredibly strict and not something ancient cultures would change lightly. There are of course many other explanations and jumping to the idea that it’s trans for fame is a poor call, but it’s not the worst woke science I’ve seen by a long shot.

Yeah but question becomes exactly what the associated cultural rituals were.

It's one thing if the person opted into it of their own freewill/preference, but there's sufficient quasi-Eunuch 'trans' traditions that I wouldn't really consider to be anything like modern conceptions of free sexual identification

Couldn't it also have been a final "fuck you" to the buried person. Burry a man and political opponent as a woman to screw him in the afterlife.

I bet we could brainstorm a dozen possible alternative interpretations, and I'm not sure an insulting one is particularly likely ... but now you've got me picturing an updated version of one of those comedy articles where they make fun of archaeologists' interpretive skills by applying them to 20th century artifacts.

"By acknowledging that 'Bobby throws like a girl', these peers show sensitivity to Bobby's non-binary gender presentation. The sparse diary entries we have are enough to deduce that Bobby began receiving encouragement at an early stage of xir transition, because although xe still uses xir deadname, they encourage xim to answer to "Sissy", as well, a nickname traditionally given to a respected older sister."

Or the guy who ran from a fight.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats