site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of February 10, 2025

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

4
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh, he can't. There's no question about that. The Biden Wave was unprecedented and terrible.

But I think net immigration will be negative for the next 4 years. If Biden had got a second term, that would have resulted in a second Biden Wave and put us firmly on the path towards a Third World future.

I think it’s possible net immigration can be ‘engineered’ to be negative by including stuff like returning students (if Trump doesn’t follow through with his / Elon’s plan of stapling green cards to diplomas) and border pushbacks, but

  1. There have been no announced plans to cut H1B numbers and Elon, H1Ber-in-chief appears even more powerful than most people expected, such that we’re more likely to see the number of those visas rise (mirroring the ongoing rise in O1 visas) along with those for dependants than we are to see them fall.

  2. Restricting family / chain migration, which is the other major source of legal immigration, would have to go through congress and there seems to be no big effort to do that at all, nobody even seems to be speaking about it.

  3. Refugee intake will likely go down, or the composition will change (there are not ‘that’ many white South Africans, but it would conceivably be possible to eg. hand out a full allocation of refugee visas to them and Ukrainians or whatever such that the composition would be altered), but that makes up a small percentage of legal migrants.

  4. Trump has criticized the Diversity Visa / lottery but hasn’t done anything about it yet. 2025 visas are being granted, 2026 applications are open and the program is going full steam ahead. Congress is doing nothing.

H1B, O1

H1B depresses wages -> political power for Blue voters, so that's working as intended; and the O1s you want no matter what anyway (it's a vital part of the brain drain pipeline, and I'd expect exit controls from countries that generate a lot of these before any limit from the US, perhaps as part of a response to economic sanctions).

Refugee intake will likely go down

Deleting the paragovernmental organizations that bring them across will help with this.

Criticized the diversity visa

It's been what, 3 weeks?